The Greater Caucasian Race

MENAs (Natufians) are the product of ancient mixing between CHG/Caucasian-like Kebara people and Pardo Iberomaurusians. They are basically ancient quadroons/octoroons (so they are part black). South Asians are likewise the product of CHG/Caucasian-type peoples crossed with abos.

Iranian Hunter-Gatherers/Caucasians/Eastern Anatolians were once one racial group, while West Anatolians were proto-sardinian type peoples that migrated West and went extinct in the Middle East.
That's why light-skinned Middle Easterners and South Asians look more like Caucasus people than Europeans. They don't have anything to do with Europeans.

There used to be genuine ancient European-type peoples who lived in Central Asia (especially the North) but they were subjected to genocide by Turco-Mongol conquerors (Any Forums's East Aryan Asian Waifus were responsible for the original White Genocide).

Attached: main-qimg-ecb27df12a9a2850b15b4d7549eeb6b9-pjlq.jpg (602x276, 34.76K)

Other urls found in this thread:

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_T-M184
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

SHUT UP NIGGER NO ONE FUCKING CARES

Attached: death_to_chomo.jpg (644x612, 20.92K)

>horn of Africa

I’m curious on the origins of Ethiopians (Amharas, Oromos, Tigray) and Somalis. Are they descendants of Natufians?

Attached: 56D559CB-E9F6-4FDE-809B-48478812F29A.jpg (220x337, 35.37K)

wh*Tes can't compete with Turanic gods.

Attached: 1586095177784.jpg (768x968, 108.8K)

Also what does this mean

Attached: D1823E46-9082-440D-8A4C-910C1FDAE5B4.jpg (1125x694, 198.88K)

Basically Arab-Negroids.

coom

correct

It doesn't mean anything. Ancient Egyptians were Natufians - they were genetically the same as modern-day Saudis/Bedouins. Syrians are products of migrants from Anatolia/Iran (Hittites, Hurrians, etc.) heading down into historically Natufian lands diluting the Natufian/SW Asian genes (red sea component) and increasing the amount of Caucasian/West Asian ancestry in the Levant.

Attached: halfarabhalfblack.jpg (1600x900, 94.91K)

There really isn't much difference between an arab and a negro anyway. I mean, whenver non-Euros mix it's not really miscegenation since they're all practically the same.

Indians are more alien and offensive to me than blacks. Smell worse too.

ban check

>Ancient Egyptians were Natufians
Except the ruling class and/or priesthood appear to have been a separate species.

Those were black.

Attached: Tutankhamun.png (1888x714, 678.9K)

That picture is from a video describing the genetics or prehistory (whatifalthist) and he says those 3 races were drastically different from one another as East Asians are to Europeans, and apparently they mixed together and were the ancestors of white people and spread agriculture.

Is this true? The syrian, egypt, and “zagros” were the 3 different races?

Attached: 2AC8293F-9A48-42F1-BB37-3A5737A2E328.jpg (2048x2048, 334.69K)

I just call them abbos now, same with pakis and bangladeshis. The look on their faces is priceless.

Like turks?

Yes

Attached: Egypt Turkish dna.jpg (991x816, 110.29K)

It's more like Zagros+Egypt = Syrian

Yea but I wondered if there was more details on Ethiopia/horn of africa.

See, in this map, we can see the countries that hail from Indo European ancestry (red, South Siberia) we see the Bantus, the Nilotes (?) we see the Early European Farmers (Yellow?) but we don’t know where Ethiopia/Eritrea hailed from

Attached: C4EB5355-77A3-4B58-9E47-69BFA693ECF7.jpg (1125x644, 377.02K)

>South Asians are likewise the product of CHG/Caucasian-type peoples crossed with abos.

what evidence do you have for that?

They were not ancestors of Europeans though, and they did not spread agriculture to Europeans. The Proto-Sardinians of Western Anatolia (now extinct in the modern region) went to Europe and introduced Europeans to agriculture.

>horn of africa
You'll see purebred negroid/homo erectus like the rest of Africa, and you'll also see the Homo erectus-Arab types.

And the proto Sardinians aren’t related to the Zagros/Syrian/Egyptian people that created agriculture

Attached: 2E0819A1-FAEE-4789-B7A7-F9A628B612A8.png (1424x3961, 492.07K)

We europeans are
Hunter gatherers, cromagnon
Anatolian farmers
Yamnaya nomad, basically a low budget cromagnon with less iq

It's also not an accurate map.

>They were not ancestors of Europeans though
They are. Modern Euros are ANF, Yamnaya, WHG mutts. People like to larp as Yamnaya themselves but they are only le 51% Yamnaya at best(Norwegian/Swedish/Finnish).

They're from Western Asia who went back to Africa and intermix with the local population

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_T-M184

>Euros are ANF, Yamnaya, WHG mutts.
Except the word mutt means unrelated sources merging, so that's not accurate.

They were mostly unrelated tho. ANF was genetic isolate, similar to WHG, similar to Yamnaya(EHG/CHG mutts).

Is this map better?

You see Egyptian herders (maybe they brought semetic languages to horn of Africa?) and then you see the Anatolian farmers (South Europe) then you see the descendants of the Steppe herders (Indo Europeans).

Basically I wanted to know if the yellow (Anatolin herders) are descended from the 3 races (Syrian, Zagros, Egypt) since they practiced t And 2. If the Horn of Africa has some ancestry from green (Egyptian herder) hence semetic languages (?)

Attached: B5BECC55-ECF0-4184-8EFC-CF46DD7D32F0.jpg (1125x520, 374.69K)

FST distances between WHG and ANF are bigger than between Irish and Punjabi.
And that's not getting to the fact that the components like ANE are themselves mutts, in that case Kostenki-like source and Tianyuan East Asian source, and the latter is where K2b, the ancestor of R1a and R1b, comes from.

>They were mostly unrelated tho.
Uh, no.

WHG and ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) derived from a split among Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), they had 20,000 years of separation before re-converging.
WHG + ANF = EEF
ANE + WHG = EHG
ANE + Anatolian-Dzudzuana = CHG (Dzudzuana were an off-shoot of WHG that settled in the Caucasus and north-east Anatolia)
EHG + CHG = WSP and WSH (Yamnaya)
EHG + WHG = SHG (Scandanavian Hunter Gatherer)
SHG + EEF = Funnelbeaker
WSH + Funnelbeaker = Corded Ware
Corded Ware + EEF = Bell Beaker

They were all closely related and originated from the same source population.

>FST distances between WHG and ANF are bigger than between Irish and Punjabi.
Except they're not.

Even the FST between Europeans and Neanderthal is And that's not getting to the fact that the components like ANE are themselves mutts, in that case Kostenki-like source and Tianyuan East Asian source, and the latter is where K2b, the ancestor of R1a and R1b, comes from.
More bullshit from a meme flag.
Just accept that non-Europeans are all mongrels projecting their Jackson Pollock genomes onto actual people.

>WHG and ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) derived from a split among Ancient North Eurasians (ANE)
WHG was haplogroup I, ANF was haplogroup G. Not R1, not Q, not N or not O. Not even K or M. They were unrelated populations.

Also your logic is kinda wrong. EEF was exactly same as ANFs. They lacked blue eye mutations.

Ok thanks, that might confirm picrel.

3 heartlands of agriculture. Bantu, Chinese, and then the middle east, where I guess the Zagros and Egyptians mixed, and then gave way the anatolians (Europe) and then to horn of Africa

Attached: DC22D547-DF52-4C74-9053-E489EF6A460A.jpg (1094x963, 430.2K)

>I wanted to know if the yellow (Anatolin herders) are descended from the 3 races (Syrian, Zagros, Egypt) since they practiced t

Refer to this: Iranian Neolithic/CHG derived from European Anatolians, that's the only connection.

Yes it is mutt, being an Aussie you might have have some abbo in the mix on top of what I said too.
By the way your neanderthal Fst claim is bs, Fst between European and blackest Nigerian is lower than between European and Neanderthal or Denisovan.