Question for chuggers:

Yes, the installation of militarily infrastructure aimed toward Russia on her longest western border absolutely is an existential threat to Russian security and act of NATO aggression.

Sweden no, Finland yes.

Kys russia cuck. Putin started this by annexing Crimea. And they were sending jn troops during donbass war. They always do this just like Georgia. They started this.

Would you give up your Black Sea coastline if USA told you so and threatened you with weapons? Would you put up a fight for your lands or just immediately surrendered?

Russia said that Ukraine joining NATO is an act of aggression, what's the difference about that with Finland? One of Putin's goals was not to expand NATO eastward but Finland is an exception, apparently.

Then this will be the third time russia loses against finland

What are you talking about, there are no finns left in Karelia. Everyone was evacuated during the last war.

Don't know if bait or no, but we lost twice.

If USA threatened to take your shit, you'd comply with whatever they told you to do.

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Finland lost twice?

We would ally with China or Russia then or whatever alternative military block is there to maximize our chances, that's exactly the situation.
But this whataboutism from you doesn't answer my question. "Superpower" attacked us and apparently we are to blame for not surrending to them kek.

technically the USA already does this, it is pressuring us to let go of Macedonia forever and it pressured us to allow Macedonia into NATO and yes my country is still not bombed beyond recognition

so there's the answer to your question

Attached: 1629765309637.png (616x131, 14.79K)

>r*ssia invades you
>takes Crimea
>takes large chunk of land to the east
>want to prevent further territorial losses
>apply to NATO
>"WTF WHY IS UKRAINE JOINING NATO???? THIS IS AGGRESSION!"
>r*ssia invades you because you want to protect yourself against r*ssian invasion

Attached: Bucha mongols.jpg (1980x1114, 645.59K)

So nukes in Königsberg are also an existential threat to NATO and a sign of russian aggression. Evens out in the end.

I don't think USA would give you that option, every country that isn't a major player has been couped the second they even suggest doing something the USA doesn't appreciate. Remember that corrupt faggot that was leading your country in 2013? He thought he could rely on Russian to support his ass and it didn't go that well for him.

US nuclear missiles too close. The same case as with you, Taras.

What the fuck, nigger

Can Russia dictate to independent countries which military what alliances they can join and threaten them with nukes?
Finland itself sees that the only guarantee of security now is joining NATO, they are not ready to bet on roulette their security.

Of course. We have no right to prevent Russia from liberating it's neighbours. The evil former warsaw pack abondoned their master despite Russia building coal plants and schools for free!

Answer me this: did you vote for Zelensky? Do you feel betrayed after he broke his promise to finish that eastern bullshit rebellion peacefully?

Yes
The only purpose of jewto is to conquer Russia for jews
>durr hurrrrr me like peace ME NO WAR
>*surrounds and builds military forces around nation shilled 24/7 as DUH ENEMY*
Boomers just won't let the cold war go

Independent nations can do whatever they like if they have the means to enforce it. Most countries don't have it.

It's disappointing seeing countries which have been neutral for so long get dragged in to future US wars, but I never really brought the aggression argument re: joining NATO, and Finland doesn't have any ongoing civil wars or territorial disputes which would make letting them in irresponsible from the west's perspective.
Just appalled by what pre-war Ukraine had been doing in Donbass and how they're getting whitewashed in the west.

>Would you put up a fight
Ukraine can barely stand on its own. It has not crashed thanks to the billions of dollars of aid from other countries, despite not officially supporting them in the war.

Finland isn’t any farther East than Greece

Yes. Now Finland will starve as a result of our idiotic politicians.

People in sweeden and finland are already ruled by atlanticists. Joining nato is a formality when the political apparatus of both countries were already sold on the global american empire.

At thisnpoint noone can pretend that nato is a neutral organization. It is a tool for the USA to have control over europe. So russia finally acting on their threats sbould not surpise anyone. Just take a look at the solomon island situation. It ia clear that there are two sets of rules those for america and its vassala and those for the rest.

>Sweden, Finland
Also known as the Limp Dick countries

But it's longitudinal distance from the russion border is less than Greeces

Konigsberg is part of the Russian federation, NATO is a multi-state alliance created with the expressed intention of destroying Russia.
If they present an existential threat to Russian security by joining NATO, then yes. Ukraine is Russia sphere of influence, Ukraine joining NATO is a risk that Russia cannot take. Also, your ongoing genocide of Russians in the Donbas and other parts of the country since 2014 is an act of aggression.