Is The Fetus A Human Being?

I wanted to see it in motion to see if it moved like a human so I checked Youtube, and the platform has zero videos about the subject that aren't genetically altered 3d models. In fact, if you search fetus on youtube e-celeb videos pop up that are completely unrelated. Gee, I wonder why.

It’s objectively a living being, biologically, and it’s objectively human in nature, genetically, so the only accurate answer is yes.

Any other answer is the mark of a pussy whipped whore enabler cuck - and also wrong.

Attached: 6B216B39-E661-42FA-A0F3-6F8F5FCAF8E8.jpg (1024x617, 93.92K)

If it being less developed makes it not human then I should be allowed to murder anyone less intellectually developed than myself, like retards and niggers

Niggers aren’t human why would their spawn be human?

1) From the very moment the zygote first splits into two cells (and arguably in the time between fertilization of the egg and the first split) it fulfills all criteria of being a living thing. It is a life.
2) From the very moment the egg and the sperm form a complete zygote, the resultant living thing has its own completely unique DNA, different from either its mother or its father. It is a genetically unique life.
3) If the zygote was formed from a HUMAN egg and a HUMAN sperm, the resultant, unique DNA is human DNA. If you found the single zygote cell and did tests on it, the result would show with absolute certainty that it was a human cell.

So it's up to you. Do you consider a genetically unique, living cell of the species homo sapiens sapiens a human being? Do you consider it after it has divided into two cells? Into four? At the cellular level of material existence, there is very little difference between a single-celled homo sapiens zygote and a singular cell from a 20-year old homo sapiens. Whether you consider one human and the other not depends on whether you believe one only qualifies as human after reaching a certain amount of cell number/specialization. That is, whether your definition of human demands functionality on a higher level of material organization than the cellular.

Attached: 1600532553299.gif (700x764, 775.17K)

Yes they are.

I am okay with abortions if they are rape babies or if they have some kind of disease like down's syndrome.

Using abortions as a contraceptive is fucked up, it is not hard to use protection nowadays, so if you do not use protection and get a baby then keep it. If you are too young then don't fuck without protection or at all.

Maybe yours are, kike

>I am okay with abortions if they are rape babies

I think that should depend on what the woman was wearing at the time.

Yes.

You probably ate a dozen bugs in your life without even noticing. Maybe slapped a few to death when you felt an itch. Bugs are alive, some are even kept as pets. Yet we kill them. We kill animals. I'm not saying we should kill humans, but let's not pretend like life is sacred.

Obviously retard. What else would it be?

Human life is sacred, animals don't matter when compared with humans

if i punch a preggo in the belly and kill the baby do I get charged with murder? if so, that's your answer

Your comment has nothing to do with my comment. I've killed lots of bugs in my life, and lots of mammals too. Nothing I said has anything whatsoever to do with bugs or nonhuman mammals or the sanctity of life. I was only commenting on what a fetus actually IS, and whether or not it is a human being (tl;dr it's definitely a human being).

>>but let's not pretend like life is sacred.
Fuck you, Satan.

Attached: 1464450928709.jpg (750x653, 105.54K)

>Is it human?
Yes
>is it a being?
Yes. It is a recognizably discreet entity. It is a being.

depends on the state