Men are the competitive sex, consumables.
A woman is a strategic resource, they are not squandered.
Because a man, unlike a woman, has no value. A woman has value by the fact of her birth. She can give birth. A man must prove that he is worth something. At least for the sake of not being in the forefront of cannon fodder in the event of a war.
Men have always been and will be consumables for society. The Paraguayan war will not let you lie. 70-90% of the entire male population died there.
It would be easier if you pretended to be a girl
Nigger tongue my anus
Real shit. Good Kekistan. Now that was gay. You want to get laid get out the needle gun, and unload into a crowd with a fuckload of heroin in it. Shit that ain't necessary for most, but whatever fuck if I care.
Notice how the men die in wars, but the women become the spoils of war just like the land and any other riches. That's what I see when you call women a "strategic resource"
About 40% of the women I went to high school and college with are childless (I'm 37). What are these women's worth?
Essentially yes. Women have always been a valuable resource, while men have been killed.
This is not a pro women narrative you dingus
All good and shit but you missed the part where females cannot survive without males.
As long as they don't become abyss, they will in any case be more important to society than a 37-year-old man.
It's simple biology, 10 men and 90 women = 90 pregnancies.
90 men and 90 women = 90 pregnancies
90 men and 10 women = 10 pregnancies.
Therefore, women will always be the first to save, and men will only have to rely on themselves and their will.
The survival and growth of the population depends primarily on women.
Trips of truth. Young, fertile women are a strategic resource for the tribe. Roastie wine aunts are a liability.
>don't become abyss
*infertile
Wrong faggot. Maybe in a functional society you would be able to make such claims, but the social contact has been broken and your sophistry is moot.
Being expendable means MORE FREEDOM
Men should start treating society as expendable
in general, the lives of men are much more expendable than the lives of women.
what I write is simple biology. It's like that everywhere in nature. Males are expendable.
Nature favor a man. Society favor woman.
>woman
A society where men aren't treated as human beings can burn in hell as far as I'm concerned. Humanity as a whole can burn in hell as long as long as things don't change.
And I don't see anyone sacrificing older women that can't have children anymore.
No man should die for the sake of a system that considers him expendable. Dying for a future world where you aren't going to live is stupid.
>women can't build/maintain a civilization
>they are somehow more important than a sperm receptacle
A hole is just a hole.
men have always been beasts of burden. It's just that the patriarchy masked this with honor and privileges.
And yet, society at any time in history would have sacrificed men to save women.
it's psychopathy
Only if I get all the benefits that come with that, now I am treated not as something worthy that is has something to give for the greater good but as something to be thrown away as trash. Expendable and unimportant isn't the same thing. Noble burden is great superflous suffering is bad.