Does female circumcision work?

>woman has a clitoris
>fucks every guy she meets who is older, Taller, and a steroid built putbull of a guy
>wants nothing to do with you if you're skinny, shorter than her, or younger.
>remove a woman's clitoris
>becomes less of a bitch

Attached: file-20171030-18735-103fyze.jpg (754x414, 24.28K)

>class I removes clitorus
This info graphic is incorrect. Class I is simply more hygienic. Nobody likes a cheese clit

It wowks untiw they discuvw t-t-the g-spot.

Most common type of femawe circumcision involves removal of t-t-the hood covering t-t-the cwitowis; Muswims *twerks* b-bewieve this m-makes a woman w-wess a-apt t-to be pwomiscuous, and also impwuvd hygienye. N-Nyeawwy all t-t-the p-pushews of femawe genyital *runs away* mutiwation awe females, and they s-say they awe comfortable and finye with i-it. Femawes have a much higher wate of cwitowaw phimosis than men. (-(Which is t-t-the inyabiwity t-to retract t-t-the pwepuce t-to expose t-t-the cwitowis.)

A g-gwoup of 9-9-9 weseawchews fwom Boston Unyivewsity School of Medicinye, and a g-gwoup of 5 weseawchews fwom Genyeva Unyivewsity Hospitaws in Switzewwand found that in t-t-two wandomized twiaws of uvw 767 adult women in 2-2002 and 2-2018, 23% of them had s-some fowm of cwitowaw adhesions. Of t-t-the 23%, 44% demonstwated ÚwÚ m-miwd cwitowaw adhesions, 22% demonstwated ÚwÚ modewate, and 14% demonstwated ÚwÚ sevewe cwitowaw a-adhesions; whiwe an additionyaw 14% wewe also pwesented with cwitowodynia, t-t-the femawe fowm of bawanyitis *huggles tightly* (gwans irritation.) This is a jaw-dwoppingwy large amount of women in compawison t-to mawe *whispers to self* phimosis wates; e-estimated t-to be 1%; demonstrating a lack of e-education or cawe about basic femawe anyatomy, shadowing t-t-the lack of e-education about mawe *whispers to self* anatomy o-o-ontop of ovewzeawous cweanying procedures which is disproportionyately, and u-unnyecessarily b-being performed on mawes on a bwoad spectwum.

The t-t-two s-studies c-c-cited a-abuv c-can be found at PubMed ID of 29559206, and PubMed ID of 11898701.

>This i-info gwaphic is incowwect. Cwass I is simply more hygienyic. Nobody wikes a c-cheese cwit

Attached: 1645361322553.png (754x585, 236.48K)

I wove ^w^ w-w-when effowt posts get turnyed t-to shit.

Twanswation; nice attempt at hiding i-info

Attached: 003.png (821x209, 23.62K)

Its more hygienyic because think of all t-t-the smegma that accumulates inside theiw pussy all t-t-the time.

Am I b-being b-bamboozwed?!?1 Are these posts really b-being edited in post or is this s-some stwange c-cowwective effowt

Nice, so tranny jannies have infiltrated the backend code of Any Forums now