Can someone explain why Russia hasn't taken Kiev yet?

China would have done it within 2 weeks.
What's going on?

Attached: HueHueHue.jpg (780x520, 53.38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

files.catbox.moe/vnext8.mp4
files.catbox.moe/gctuxk.mp4
files.catbox.moe/0tzpvz.mp4
files.catbox.moe/aafelp.mp4
files.catbox.moe/k3v573.mp4
files.catbox.moe/7wbyzy.mp4
files.catbox.moe/wolj3p.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dpxlx4.mp4
files.catbox.moe/noet6s.mp4
files.catbox.moe/14k8gv.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dpzqbj.mp4
files.catbox.moe/6y2sg7.mp4
files.catbox.moe/rziq4p.mp4
files.catbox.moe/pwn31v.mp4
files.catbox.moe/0xceqb.mp4
files.catbox.moe/lxcqz1.mp4
files.catbox.moe/u1l6to.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dba8cy.mp4
files.catbox.moe/g4ncbi.mp4
files.catbox.moe/yi7at7.mp4
files.catbox.moe/l8eo7b.mp4
files.catbox.moe/tzkt7j.mp4
files.catbox.moe/9rmxqx.mp4
files.catbox.moe/p5s46g.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dvhhge.mp4
files.catbox.moe/iqvboz.mp4
files.catbox.moe/2zufzt.mp4
files.catbox.moe/e6dknz.mp4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because they just want to remove the puppet government and circle around the nazi resistance.

Can someone explain why all the cute twinky azovs keep dying? It’s not fair!!!

Attached: A55A5A59-218A-4169-AE8F-D1038A6289D4.jpg (1280x596, 94.36K)

Because they avoid killing civilians, at great expense. So far, Russia has eliminated 75%+ of Ukraine's tanks, and 30k+ of Ukraine's soldiers. Most of the remaining Ukrainian military is concentrated in Donbas.

>China would have done it within 2 weeks.
China does everything in 2 weeks. The eternal 2 weeks nation.

ahahahahaha!

The entire west took 5 months to destroy iraqs army

>Because those Russians are trying to identify between Civilians and Ukraine Forces
>Ukraine are forcing civilians as human shields in residential buildings.

files.catbox.moe/vnext8.mp4

Translated Local Interviews:
files.catbox.moe/gctuxk.mp4
files.catbox.moe/0tzpvz.mp4
files.catbox.moe/aafelp.mp4
files.catbox.moe/k3v573.mp4
files.catbox.moe/7wbyzy.mp4

Untranslated Interviews:
files.catbox.moe/wolj3p.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dpxlx4.mp4
files.catbox.moe/noet6s.mp4
files.catbox.moe/14k8gv.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dpzqbj.mp4
files.catbox.moe/6y2sg7.mp4

International Interviews:
files.catbox.moe/vnext8.mp4

International Reporters:
files.catbox.moe/rziq4p.mp4
files.catbox.moe/pwn31v.mp4
files.catbox.moe/0xceqb.mp4

Humanitarian:
files.catbox.moe/lxcqz1.mp4
files.catbox.moe/u1l6to.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dba8cy.mp4
files.catbox.moe/g4ncbi.mp4
files.catbox.moe/yi7at7.mp4
files.catbox.moe/l8eo7b.mp4

Civilians Helping Russians:
files.catbox.moe/tzkt7j.mp4

Extra:
files.catbox.moe/9rmxqx.mp4
files.catbox.moe/p5s46g.mp4
files.catbox.moe/dvhhge.mp4

Warcrimes by AZOV:
files.catbox.moe/iqvboz.mp4
files.catbox.moe/2zufzt.mp4
files.catbox.moe/e6dknz.mp4

Attached: 1647776231331.jpg (1069x997, 90.72K)

They don't want Kyiv, it's a Ukrainian cope. They only want The Russian parts of Ukraine.

Russia wants a puppet government, not destruction. If they bombed Afghanistan like the Americans did, it would be fast. But they have no money to rebuild Ukraine, a completely destroyed Ukraine is worthless to Putin.

Attached: -27f8ec30a4df0206.jpg (720x539, 26.38K)

Why take Kiev? Give me a reason why they should take and hold it?

>China would have done it
China still can’t even take back Taiwan, even after 75 years. It’s a tiny island, right off their own coast and they choose to cope and seethe instead.

Attached: 576B12D8-9D34-4D2A-AC0C-085372AACB41.jpg (1125x765, 634.33K)

Holding Kiev would require providing humanitarian support to the people of Kiev, as well as dealing with ever present resistance fighters. By encircling Kiev, they tie up the Ukrainian forces, reducing defence of the areas that Russia actually wants to capture.

>Give me a reason why they should take and hold it?
Just to piss off twitter and reddit.

I would just destroy Kiev from a distance with artillery and cruise missiles.

I’m excuse me can we answer the only important question in this thread right now

Chinas economy isn’t stuck in the 80’s like Russia

>meanwhile Russia lost its first soldier
Shitnik, first of all, I hope you don’t believe the propaganda numbers your puppet (((government))) serves you.

Also we (the west) are already sending new weapons and tanks to Ukraine. and this won’t be the last delivery.

>the entire west
cope harder, Ivan. Moscow only exists because we allow it to.

Or you are just running out of ammo. Would explain why you attack worthless targets with ultrasonic missles while Russians in the front line beg for good .

Ahem

you make it sound like it's easy to navigate a country 50% desert, 50% mountain.

> humanitarian support to the people of Kiev

They don’t even allow people to be evacuated from Mariupol. Why would they care about citizens of Kiev suddenly? Cope harder.

Kiev has a lot of soldiers in it. Currently they're pulling off of Kiev onto other targets to try and bait them out and dilute Kievs defenses.
The siege during the last two weeks was to prevent Kiev assisting other objectives.
It's a pretty good strategy and must be pretty frustrating to deal with. If Kiev doesn't take the bait, then Russia can just take whatever objectives Kiev fails to reinforce and bomb Kiev safely later.
Basically Kiev will be last, and it should be fairly obvious why.

Russia is weak and ripe for the taking. Anyone could conquer Russia.