Polygamy- based or cringe?

On one hand, it's great for the gene pool. Chads always had 2, 3, or even 4+ wives plus many concubines and war brides.

On the other hand, dealing with the bullshittery of multiple wives would be hell on earth unless you lived in an Islamic country.

What is a good balance? I think 3 wives for each white man would be a good option.

Attached: images (80).jpg (640x480, 49.41K)

>having to put up with more than one woman
no amount of pussy is worth the headache desu

>great for the gene pool
no, it isn't. it's called bottlenecking

>multiple wives would be hell on earth
I don't think so but that's not the point

>What is a good balance?
polygamy ruins society, creating large populations of sexually frustrated men who have no sexual prospects and must satisfy themselves with violence

two women licking my peepee at the same time does seem pretty phenomenal though

Crinch.

When you have nothing a single woman desires you have nothing mankind deems worthy of preserving.

Neither. It's bad for the species. Our children do better with two parents. Chad can usually barely raise one, let alone a ton of them.

Manlet cope

The balance is no wives. Rape and pillage and let the women sort out the rest when you've moved on.

It only works in societies where domestic violence is socially unacceptable

Every Chad with three wives means that there are two men who don’t get to have any. Whether you think that’s based or cringe depends on where you stand on the incel question.

6"1 fag. Quit sticking up for dumbasses

Young men are usually out dying in wars
Then it's based.
Based

question
how ancient are stds?
why bother risking going to a brothel get sloppy seconds and a rash.
just save up or pillage for slaves and just fuck your own private brothel.

Two beta apes defeat one alpha ape
The trick to polygamy is female surplus thru war or something
Or you can risk treading the line (as a society) of pushing out more and more betas right before the point of them uprising, edging if you will
Depending on how long you can edge polygamy, it might still be an evolutionarily viable option depending on your personal birth rate

I like how the idea of relationships is not even mentioned anymore. It's always just this or that way of fucking and (seldomly) reproducing. A beautiful work the jews did on you, every shred of humanity stripped. Marvelous.

how many penises do you have?

if THAT'S what polygamy looks like then yes, extremely based and whitepilled

>the idea of relationships
whats that and where do you think you are rn?🤖

>muh chads
>muh genepool

Rewarding Machiavellian pricks isn't great for the genepool because they fuck over the entire population to help themselves. These people's value is illusory and those who help them get more women are stupid cuckolds.

Attached: 1636064299400.png (373x548, 11.45K)

humans eat each other when there's nothing else to eat. your lofty ideas about humanity are delusion.

Based, would you rather be the kid of some dysgenic loser christcuck working a office job for 50 years? or some alpha chad?

Ah yes, another "Islam is right about *" thread

A) Polygamy happens in patriarchal cultures so you don't have to put up with their bullshit
B) They will be competing with each other to be your favorite so won't even want to give you bullshit
C) They will take their bullshit out on each other

>human capability of degradation means degraded is the desired state
clever

polygamy = primitive shit holes that gets conquered by monogamous culture.

The so called barbarians that destroyed Rome were chaste and monogamous while the roman were degenerate.

Attached: 1643727711548.webm (640x360, 2.62M)