Women do not make good decisions about who has superior genes

because they dont even think for themselves as all social status is artificially created by the media and is not a reality. status is only based on whos face is on the front cover of a glossy magazine directed only towords women or whoever s face is on a televised screen the most often. women are attracted to rapists drug dealers and criminals who do not bother to raise their own children. women make stupid and bad choices while responsible employed men who pay their bills on time get passed over by these women.
patriarchy benefited everyone in society including women but man hating feminists who write the articles for these dumb young women to read do not know this.
go to school until you are 30 and get a high paying office job. that is all these women are taught by old divorced shrews that hate men and do not want men and women to have sexual relationships with each other. women have destroyed society and it is mens job to save it because in many ways women are stupider then man are and need to be led because they do not know what is good for them and do not care about what is best for society. they only want to "travel" and buy expensive shoes only because they are expensive to show their social status to other women.

Attached: 1648827080804.jpg (1080x1314, 290.17K)

Hypergamy causes the opposite of eugenics. What a fucking moron.
When you have to pick just one partner you get very picky.

Women, before hypergamy, usually weren't the ones picking their own partner though. Historically speaking, their father did and usually for financial reasons (not picking someone who is more attractive / fit than other potential mates).

Hypergamy allows women to try out as many men as they want before settling on the one they deem the "most fit." Therefore it does end up contributing to eugenics by giving women the chance to scope out the best potential mate. 😊

Attached: wink.jpg (474x421, 20.24K)

Why should I care what some vagina has to say?

>flood your own folk with inferior genes
Oh, so she supports killing all niggers, jews, etc?

you want a woman who has fucked 100 guys before she decided to settle down with you?
I dont.

>Hypergamy causes the opposite of eugenics.
No, it doesn't. In a truly hypergamous society, the majority of women will be bred by the minority of superior men, creating stronger stock. However, when it's women just going around fucking a nubch of different men, that's like reverse hypergamy

Spencer was considered one of the greatest minds of his time. Now he is memory holed. Two of his quotes for your enjoyment
"Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty. It is a deliberate storing up of miseries for future generations. There is no greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles." - Herbert Spencer

Attached: Screenshot_692.jpg (1705x119, 77.84K)

It's not about what men want, it's about hypergamy actually contributing to eugenics by ironically giving women the capacity to be more selective

i am the best judge of what i think good genetics are

>Hypergamy allows women to try out as many men as they want before settling on the one they deem the "most fit."
They'll pick a deadbeat 90IQ rapist who abandons them the moment they get pregnant

Does eugenic breeding matter, when you can just have a gmo baby with desired traits? Find someone you love, make money, make gmo baby chads.

this is what happens in reality.

women are bad at making decisions about that.
you did not read my post.

that is the proof.
it is now time to bring back "the patriarchy"

>Dumb blond occupying a simp niche and providing no original thought whatsoever

This assumes that women are also involved with the survival of the fittest which is simply not the case. A women is instinctually to whoever will give them the most children. That's why flattery works, that's why they go for a good looking guy, that's why they go for a "bad boy". The fittest would be the ones most likely to stick around and help raise the kids, but at a subconscious level women weigh having more kids over having successful kids, even better if the one who pumps and dumps has to go through hoops to prove he wants to impregnate her.

WRONG

The ideal is only gentic elites getting a license to have sex.

Reminder that HyPergamy is Dysgenic
Arranged Marriages are EUGENIC

Attached: HypergamyDysgenic.jpg (960x720, 104.75K)

I love seeing imbeciles have kid after kid while I can’t even bring one into this world (unless I want them rubbing elbows with m*xican gangsters, ch*nese dogeaters, and ghetto blacks). Thanks for this shit society!

The flaw with this idea you're presenting is that it assumes that once the child pops out of the vagina, the job's done and that's wrong. Like 90% of the effort in creating a good human is what comes after the child pops out.
Those superiour men would have to actually take care of their children, because otherwise they'll create human garbage no matter how good their genes are.

Right, but this is old news.
Why even rehash well established fact.
Why can't shills at least make a half way interesting thread.