HOW CAN A PLANE DESTROY HUGE BUILDING?

Why are conspiratards so dumb. They will go on hour long tirades about long complicated plans and conspiracies to explain how something impossible happened, when it takes 2 seconds to actually see that their first premise is nonsense.
The 9/11 conspiracy theory is the ultimate litmus test. Flat Earthers are either complete trolls or religious fanatics, Lizardmen conspiracy tarts are just shizos, but many 9/11 "Truthers" consider themselves to be intelligent and "MUH CONSPIRACY THEORY IS REAL UNLIKE ALL THE OTHER ONES THAT ARE DUMB!".
It literally takes 2 seconds to see that no conspiracy happened, big planes at high speed hit buildings that are almost all air and glass.

Attached: wtc99.jpg (640x820, 70.84K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8jC9W2vbyrs
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Rebuilding_America's_Defenses_2
youtu.be/S_NeOJoBqNs
youtu.be/qfPx20bGH88
youtube.com/watch?v=4pUf_00jMvQ&feature=emb_title
youtube.com/watch?v=FNt7s_Wed_4
youtube.com/watch?v=yLnKiTmO64c
youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY
bitchute.com/hashtag/warbydeception/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You have a very small peener, bro

nice try adl

GR8 B8 M8 8/8

>buildings that are almost all air and glass.
Then why would it collapse under its own weight if it's only air and glass ?

Problem with all conspiracy nutjobs is their inability to look at it from the bottom up, only ever looking down from "the big bad" did it.
When you look at any of them for longer than 2 seconds its laughable how nonsensical they are.

I don’t mind conspiracy theories because genuine conspiracies exist and those theories have a chance at exposing them. The 9/11 one I tend to disagree with because a lot of the theories oversimplify building construction and plane crashes. However without this critical analysis I would still genuinely believe 6 million kikes were murdered while having zero corroborating evidence for anything near that number.

atomic demolition munitions

>(((silverstein)))

How can falling debris completely collapse a nearby building?

It’s not funny to joke about 9/11. My uncle died that day. He flew the plane into the south tower

what debris?
that's the million dollar question, what debris? thousands and thousands of tons of steel and concrete fell down when the towers collapsed, but no big piece was ever identified, photographed, recorded on video, hit the nearby buildings or anything else.
where did all the debris go?

Because people who design skyscrapers are smarter than you

youtube.com/watch?v=8jC9W2vbyrs

i let judy be my voice, she's asking the real questions - where did the building go?

antisemite

proudly

Attached: 1647126779776.jpg (950x960, 70.93K)

767 is a big fucking plane.
>but the Empire State Building was hit by a plane and survived!
It was a B-25, it weighed less than 1/10 what a 767 weighs. All the bullshit about steel melting and controlled demolition and remote control planes is well poisoning, the government knew the attacks were coming and allowed it. The CIA pulled the same trick putting out all kinds of bullshit about the JFK assassination and you retards always fall for it.

Attached: BE092023-54DB-4070-A139-9B07F8EDF2BC.jpg (1024x704, 86.73K)

How did they fall straight down and not just have the top topple off. Both of them. And WT7. It gets a little suspicious if you take more than 2sec to look into it

You mean they added more than air and glass ?

asking a question in the title then answering your own question in the body
thread FAIL

That pic just gives me an old...feel. I can't really describe it, but it's beautiful. Sunset really encapsulates the 90's perfectly.

Attached: 1563283204173.png (507x540, 64.09K)

Google pancake collapse

If only someone called 911, maybe Boaz wouldn't lose Jachin

Attached: 1643532399471.png (4306x6954, 1.57M)

How much heavier is the World Trade Center comparatively speaking?
Also with having more modernized building infrastructure?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Rebuilding_America's_Defenses_2

Founder (((William Kristol))), (((Robert Kagan)))

Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

youtu.be/S_NeOJoBqNs

youtu.be/qfPx20bGH88

youtube.com/watch?v=4pUf_00jMvQ&feature=emb_title

youtube.com/watch?v=FNt7s_Wed_4

youtube.com/watch?v=yLnKiTmO64c

youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY

Attached: 1495361673663.jpg (816x2880, 770.98K)

>HOW CAN A PLANE DESTROY HUGE BUILDING?
By hitting it 3/4 of the way up, annealing its load-bearing steel frame, resulting in the collapse of the upper section above the impact point, which then becomes the catalyst for a controlled demolition "pull" that cascades the lower floors down atop one another.

Attached: the_hava_nagila.gif (1280x392, 1.35M)

All the theories you mention were put into place to throw off real leads. They were put into place by the 9/11 truth movement. It discredited anyone who was doing real research. Things you didn’t mention:
>ptech whistle blower
>convar recovering WTC hard drives that showed 100 mil extra trading from the computers before and during attack
>convar then bought by kroll inc, run by “former” intelligence
>former flight instructor who worked at the school quit
>fbi shows up at his door 4 hours after attack
>tells him keep mouth shut
>cia has Malaysian secret police take photos of two of the high jackers involved
There’s so much of this stuff, and it’s quite clear who was involved and how they financed it. The thermite/bombs/dancing Israelis/missles/wedge/holograms all put in place as a distraction… guess what? It worked.

Attached: 33BCE4FE-7694-49DF-9295-F2F6EC4C0375.png (984x828, 934.41K)

dangerously based BR bro

A plane dug out this crater. Do you really think a little building can survive a direct hit?

Attached: 0312-ctm-planecrashlatest-patta-1802012-640x360.jpg (1920x1080, 245.13K)

GLOWIE

>what is the "Promise" software program(?), for 666 half-shekels, Merv

Attached: bush_9-11.png (480x854, 513.41K)

Is that the Chinese plane ?

It was built to -- more than one hit, at that.

Attached: 1631371635838.jpg (3120x4160, 1.94M)

Lots of faggotry in this thread.
bitchute.com/hashtag/warbydeception/

Lol OP is a fucking faggot shill. Cass (((Sunstein))) wrote this book btw, which proclaimed they would invade online groups to dismiss anyone who talked about 9.11

Attached: cognitive.jpg (400x599, 26.4K)

Can you recommend a good doc?

The Empire State Building is probably heavier, it’s built a lot sturdier and isn’t much shorter. It’s common knowledge that skyscrapers built after WW2 are cheaply constructed garbage.