Would Germany have beaten the USSR if it was a 1 v 1 ?

Would Germany have beaten the USSR if it was a 1 v 1 ?
Meaning there is no Anglo-American alliance with the USSR
Meaning there is no Anglo-American Air Supremacy and Bombing Campaigns, lend lease and Intel

Germany already beated Russia in WW1 despite being in a 1v3 so its maybe possible (Austria and Ottomans did nothing for germany so they dont count)
Seing all the defeats and disaster of USSR/Russia currently and over those last 120 years(Russo-Japanese war, WW1, Soviet Polish War, Winter War, Afghanistan, Chechenya, Goergia, Ukraine) it seems that their WW2 victory was just huge luck

Attached: 1648690670375.jpg (236x367, 19.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brusilov_offensive
ww2-weapons.com/military-expenditures-strategic-raw-materials-oil-production/amp/
combinedfleet.com/economic.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yes.

I think it would be 50/50 , ussr still have the chances , but lend lease really helped ussr, so without it beating germany would been hard. Sorry for my bad english

Yes because the USSR was a commie state with centralized system meeting you take moscow which they came close to doing than the whole thing would fall.
But no one would let them get away with it and he would be forced to fight almost everyone but a greater chance of winning this time

>if
cant make any history with ifs...

>Austria and Ottomans did nothing for germany so they dont count
Dude , most of austrian army was fighting russia

but..

keep coping commie retard

That was actually 1: 1. 3/4 of the Germans were killed on the eastern front, only 1/4 on the western. The Americans landed in Europe only after Stalingrad.

Yeah , like if stalin wouldnt shot 2/3 of red army officers and generals , 1941 wouldnt been so disastorous for soviet army

Not to mention all europe military complex , exept british ofc, were working for wehrmacht

And they got BTFO and need Germany to win
Its Germany that beated Russia in WW1
Not austria

Depends on who attacks first I guess.

(((Stalin)))

(((Hitler)))

you cunts gg 50 seconds in because their lings ran past your bunker

The Anglo-American air force basically wiped out the Luftwaffe and Germany ressources
Whitout them that mean the luftwaffe and germany ressources are still intact and we all know Air Supremacy is King
Also lend lease
Lend lease helped USSR greatly too

Yes. OKW des Heeres also should've been commanded by someone else in 1941.

You dont know how wars work , right ? They still hold on significant russian forces , which could be used to fight germans. Just like ottomans

But didnt operation Brussilov almost annilated Austria ?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brusilov_offensive

Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe go fuck yourself.

Attached: 1648656084528.jpg (540x960, 71.1K)

you stupid fucking cunt here it isn't talked about troops but lend lease, program through which USA was supplying USSR with all kinds of material goods, vehicles, planes and everything else needed to wage war that started in early 1942. Without it USSR would be toast, or if not toast would definitely have even more deaths.

Something like west is doing in Ukraine right now, but on far greater scale

definately.
lend lease helped alot, also, google for "Operartion Pike" to understand, why Hitler didnt cut off completely oil supply from Baku, which would be death sentence to USSR.

ww2-weapons.com/military-expenditures-strategic-raw-materials-oil-production/amp/

combinedfleet.com/economic.htm

Attached: 9F1A3B57-5D28-4907-BFB2-427D51C5D796.jpg (290x450, 46.15K)

Also the Bombing Campaigns and the western allied airforce
People dont realise how important Air Supremacy is

So from all alternative realities possible, you live in the one that the Third Reich lost the war.
>And you are wondering why your lives are so misarable.

>Russia vs Germany 1v1
yeah totally. it was not only the ferocity but the fact that two huge enemies came from two different sides.