Give it to me straight.
Does Russia have a chance at taking Kharkiv?
Give it to me straight
Luke Wright
David Thompson
prolly
Julian Scott
Russia has shown they're incapable of taking and actually holding cities, they could just flatten it, but if they flatten every city in Ukraine they still have to rebuild it which they naturally don't want to do, no matter what they do here they're kinda fucked by it.
Alexander Hill
Come and take it
Cameron Phillips
when it's all over, Ukraine will just balkanize like Yugoslavia did many years ago.
This keeps happening as a subtle warning to the US. Much like the tiki torches in the color revolutions over there, the plan is for that to happen here.
Christian Young
Prolly will be like this at the end
Jeremiah Cox
>Does Russia have a chance at taking Kharkiv?
What Kharkiv? Where? It's just empty place. Ukraine is just fucking desert..
Wyatt Brown
>Russia has shown they're incapable of taking and actually holding cities
Azov-chan, you're still alive after the clean up operation in Mariopol?
John Powell
Omg, it’s the ghost of kyiv
Gabriel Green
чo мнe к тeбe идти. пoceвнyю хoхлocтaн в этoм гoдy yжe пpoeбaл, тaк чтo ты дypaк caм нa кoлeнях пpипoлзeшь зa pyccкoй гyмaнитapкoй, кoгдa пocлeдних coбaк в гopoдe дoeшь.
Asher Perez
Thomas Peterson
Thomas Harris
They don't need it
Russia is using a great series of faints while it fortifies the south east the true goal all along
They will keep that and only that
Austin Adams
there's nothing left of mariopol, they had to flatten the city to take a rubble pile is my point, they won't be able to take an intact city without reducing each and every last one of them to ash like they did with mariopol.
Carter Gray
Kharkov*
And yes.
Blake Sanders
Dude, you're not getting back territory you don't currently occupy-- to suggest you will or should is both insulting and counterproductive. Get lucid.
Chase Brooks
>Russia can't take cities
>Ok they can take cities but they're destroyed
YOU ARE HERE
>Ok they can take cities and damage is limited to less than 5% of buildings but civilian casualties are high
>Ok they can take cities and damage is limited to less than 5% of buildings and civilian casualties are less than 1/20th of the civilian casualties compared to Fallujah but they can't do it again
>Ok they did it again
>Ok they've taken all of eastern Ukraine but can't take the west
>Ok they took of Ukraine but the global famine won't kill more than 10 million Americans
Brody Price
Nathaniel Morales
Zelenskyy will bend the knee or be destroyed
Ryder Carter
cope
Jose Fisher
Why should I care
Juan Morales
No, the entire northern front is obviously a failure. They have taken nothing, will ultimately take nothing, and should refocus on the south where they seem to be making actual progress.
Parker Stewart
Hudson Bell
I accept your humiliating concession of defeat
Xavier Ortiz
Yes, but once the close the donbass cauldron
Nathaniel Diaz
>should refocus on the south where they seem to be making actual progress.
they cant just "refocus" on the south they have a ton of shit deployed in the north. should they turn everything around and drive out of ukrain and pack up into trains and redeploy to the south?
Jace Russell
Based defender