Why are we not giving MIGs ans S300 SAMs to Ukraine again?
Why are we not giving MIGs ans S300 SAMs to Ukraine again?
>we
NATO
>we
i dont want it
you're scared lil faggs
>27k armored vehicles
more than half of it is some obsolete crap sitting gutted in some warehouse
>Why are we not [indirectly participating in a war]
We can also stop being fucking faggots once in a while
But Russia doesn’t use its whole military
+Russia said itself that they will intercept any military aid that is coming from the west
Because they are useless.
1 submarine
Imagine lying about owning a submarine. The enemy would be so paranoid.
>Why are we not giving MIGs ans S300 SAMs to Ukraine again?
Because Europe (Germany) needs Russian gas.
>warplanes 27
>helicopters 4
how can this be?
Russia has claimed to have destroyed more than 300 Ukrainian aircraft
you aren't calling them liars are you user?
Ukraine had more S-300 systems than all of Nato combined, more up to date too, but the ones they had didn't do much good, and any Nato sends in will not do any good either.
The same with Migs from the 90s, they are not going to change a single thing.
Do they have to give away for free repeatedly? Ukraine is kinda armaholic right now. They would buy anything.
>again
when was the first time?
>>we
this
Based Putin is protecting his people in Ukraine.
What a leader. Russia should feel proud.
>had more S-300 systems than all of Nato combined
OTAN uses S-300?
Russia is invading with 80,000
Ukraine has 300,000 actives and 900,000 reserves
Brits in charge of infographics...
Giving advanced weapons to Nazis really destroys the narrative.
Most of what you'll give us will fall on our civilian building you idiot!
No. NATO uses patriot system like a bunch of retards. There are some s300 in EU hands but not current
Not my problem
I only feel something poking in my bumhole
What was that on the picture?
Rare