Homophobia
Other urls found in this thread:
gaytimes.co.uk
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
twitter.com
a butt pirate flag. LOL, fucking pottery
Study brought to you by a couple of lying faggots.
>Having an aversion to demonic temptation
>"lol your genitalia increased its blood supply"
Maybe if you stopped being obsessed with genitals for one week, you could actually think straight.
New meme, just made it today. What do you think?
The heterosexual non-homophobic men in the study also have an aversion to homosexuality, since they are heterosexual, they are not fond of male-to-male sex. So why didn't the heterosexual non-homophobic men get an erection?
/thread
Having a sexuality that is different to the majority does not mean one is entitled to have rights. Gay people can still live without "rights".
Thats because those rights are only about marriage. But who said that marriage is important to gay people? I am pretty sure gay people don't care about same-sex marriage and the can live without "homosexual rights".
>So why didn't the heterosexual non-homophobic men get an erection?
That is a question for Satan, and it is also true that they could just be lying:
I wasn't anti faggot until I realized what consequences accepting faggotry has for society, does this mean I am a fag according to this study?
Well I don't understand why someone would want to lie about such thing. I would like to believe that heterosexual homophobic men have a conscious aversion whereas non-homophobic people have an unconscious aversion. This conscious aversion is what causes tension in the heterosexual homophobic, causing an erection.
I have absolutely no attraction towards anything that isn't a woman who was born with XX chromosomes. I see gays as filthy beings who are aroused by disgusting shit
At the base level, it has conformed us to discuss a faggot "science article" on a stupid anime forum. Should probably just report the OP for being off-topic to clean up this shit.
>consequences accepting fagotry has for society
what are those consequences
> does this mean I am a fag according to this study?
I can't say anything about that. I would guess that you are not because you became an anti-faggot by rational conviction.
This is a single retard who fell deep into the LGBT cult and allowed their child to transition. It does not imply a major change in moral foundations/culture.
The same person who did this study also responded to a scientific paper arguing that changes in penile circumference does not indicate sexual arousal: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Disgusting displays of degenracy on tv and in popular culture in general and ofcourse new degeneracies like the tranny culture which is even more sickening, when these things were discussed gays said they would keep it behind closed doors but turns out that was a lie, now there are even degenerate parades for being a faggot, I feel like they kinda bamboozeld me desu but atleast I learned slippery slope wasn't a fallacy afterall
I don't understand why gay people like to convey to the world that they are homosexual. It seems pointless. If you are gay, just be gay behind closed doors. Gay people have been existing ever since the greeks.
>appeal to novelty
Logical fallacy right there
How is this appeal to novelty? I didn't claim that allowing prepubescent children to transition is right because its novel.