Hypothetically speaking, what if Israel just straight up announced a wide-scale and systemic extermination of all Palestinians? IDF soldiers are ordered to round them up and kill them, including elderly and children.
Response from world, america and arab world?
German media would censor it, american boomers would support it and think it benefits them because "muuhhh our way of life, freedom"
Hopefully they'll learn from the German's mistake. If Israel doesn't get all of them then we'll need to listen to Pali survivors bitch about the Holocaust/Shoa/Nakba for 75 years while they plan out the genocide of a third group of people.
Do you want to deal with that bullshit?
Yes i want that, because then the jews would lose their immunity to criticism
It's easy to miscount if you arbitrarily add 5.9 million to your numbers.
Unironically would join golem battalion to fight muzzies
world wouldn't do shit
Realistically? Immediate Invasion by all their neighbours. All work done to be recognised since 1973 would be wasted. That's not even bringing up going to such extremes would rip Israeli society in half. And from the west, while it's easy to ignore shooting a couple kids throwing rocks here and there especially when said kids' parents are firing rockets in return a full-blown genocide would be met with immediate turnabout.
>a full-blown genocide would be met with immediate turnabout.
Literally the only thing holding the Jews back. They've wanted the Muslims gone since before Israel existed.
>Realistically? Immediate Invasion by all their neighbours.
and this would probably result with the activation of samson option.
>man with no understanding of history makes stupid comments
You're dumb, faggot. Jews and muslims were besties for longer than they were enemies.
Show flag, kike
true, and lib media would downplay it. even arab media owned by the monarchs would censor it.
>Jews and muslims were besties for longer than they were enemies.
Then the Zionists showed up and wanted the Muslims gone.
perspectivia.net
>It is certainly true that Zionist leaders, from the 1890s
onwards, indeed, beginning with the Zionist movement's prophet
and founder, Theodor Herzl, occasionally toyed with the idea of transferring some or all of the Arabs from the area of the Jewish state-to-be to make way for massive Zionist immigration and settlement. (The movement's leaders anticipated massive waves of immigration as a result of the surge in eastern European antisemitism, beginning with the pogroms of 1881-4 in the tsarist empire.)
>For example, in one passage in his diaries, Herzl wrote: 'We must expropriate gently .... We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries [i.e. the countries of destination], while denying it employment in our country .... The removal of the poor must be carried out discretely and circumspectly.'
Not the best argument you're making bringing up Herzel. The guy was willing to take any land offered. There were talks to give them Uganda, even. He was chill with literally anything as long as it was a Jewish state. You're also ignoring that Jews and Arabs were buddies for 500+ years before all this stuff.
Pretty much. It's why it'd never happen and this slow and steady demographic replacement route is what they're pursuing.
The United States should end military aid to Israel
1. Israel can pay for its own military. Israel has a strong economy, an excellent international credit rating, and runs frequent budget surplus. Israel ran an annual surplus of more than a billion dollars six out of the last ten years.
2. Military aid to Israel is a security risk. Israel is a major supplier of military technology to China. These sales have been instrumental in the modernization of the Chinese military. Israel developed the Lavi fighter from American technology with 1.5 billion in American subsidies. Israel sold the Lavi fighter to China. It is now called the J-10 and is the mainstay of the Chinese Air Force. Israel has also sold China missile guidance systems,, advanced radar systems and targeting systems.
3. Israel is a diplomatic liability.
4. Military aid to Israel is illegal under the Leahy Law because of Israel's human rights violations. Any aid to Israel is illegal under the Symington amendment which prohibits aid to nations with nuclear weapons that have not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and do not permit inspections of their nuclear sites
>The guy was willing to take any land offered. There were talks to give them Uganda, even.
Modern day Kenya, and the Jews didn't like the lions.
>The next year, a three-man delegation was sent to inspect the plateau. Its high elevation gave it a temperate climate, making it suitable for European settlement. However, the observers found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures.
Also, there were people there too. They were still basically going to ethnically cleanse somebody.
>Moreover, it was populated by a large number of Maasai who did not seem at all amenable to an influx of people coming from Europe.
en.wikipedia.org
>You're also ignoring that Jews and Arabs were buddies for 500+ years before all this stuff.
Yea, before the Zionists showed up and decided they need to kick out the Muslims and bring about Jewish domination of the land.
You muslim or something? You're conceding that they were buddies for 5x as long as they were enemies but somehow also are pretending it's not true...
>Realistically? Immediate Invasion by all their neighbours
kek, we won't do shit to Israel even if killed all palesfags. Not because we're afraid but because we don't give a shit anymore about those faggots even if we have to pretend to be so publicly.
lol what for? iran's gonna bomb the shit out of them soon enough, and for free.
I would turn into the biggest antisemite that existed in human history
>alternate history where Sadat and Rabin don't get assassinated and a glorious Egypt/Israel alliance consumes the middle east and creates a hegemony on trade in the region
Interesting "what-if" for me. The region has so many of them
This is unironic cope. Nevermind what your populace thinks (even if true) means nothing Sisi knows his base and more importantly knows his social and financial backers and while they don't care about the Palestinians as things stand in a full-blown into the gas chambers genocide the backers of his backers aren't going to let them sit tight and therefore neither will they him. Never mind the other factions in Egyptian politics.
If you want the truth without bullshitting, Israel has been proven to be reliable since we made the peace treaty. All the breaches in the last 40+ years came from our side and they turned a blind eye since they knew it was coming from the top.
Ironically enough, all the sabotage, the harm and the backstabbing towards Egypt, came from supposedly our """brothers""", not Israel.