What is the final solution to the Shitbull problem?

What is the final solution to the Shitbull problem?

Attached: 1648454506533.jpg (750x498, 88.05K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pitbullinfo.org/inaccurate-pit-bull-statistics.html
youtu.be/OrocEmhLsJk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

that picture is still hilarious

>pitbull
>covers 10 different breeds of dog, and any mixture of those breeds
>they do the most attacks!
That's the equivalent of adding Hispanics and mixed race as "White" and then saying Whites cause the most mass shootings and therefore should be disarmed. The real question is WHO owns these dogs.

eat them

Attached: index.jpg (259x194, 11.32K)

just give them what they want

pitbullinfo.org/inaccurate-pit-bull-statistics.html
Just going to leave this here.

Kill all dogs. De-domesticate all animals.

Bad owner problem, you mean?

To be fair this, if all darkies and untermensch were lined up against a wall then pitbulls would die out in a couple decades.
Why just focus on the dog when you could tackle both?

>spend generations breeding dogs specifically to be mindlessly violent
>dogs act mindlessly violent
>"n-n-noooooooo it's not their fault, no bad dogs just bad owners!"
Why are people like this? Why is it that we can all understand and accept that dogs have always been selectively bred for certain traits, *except* for when it's pitbulls mauling babies?
>n-n-no stop using official stats, you have to listen to the PIDF!
This is some bullshit. They're taking totally unrelated info and strapping it together into a retarded Franken-argument
>100% FALSE: PITBULL-TYPE DOGS ACCOUNT FOR AROUND 65% OF FATAL DOG ATTACKS
>STUDY #1: 60% OF PITBULL-TYPE DOGS ARE MISIDENTIFIED... In this study, pitbull-type dogs were misidentified 60% of the time
Shelter workers couldn't accurately identify them at a glance, great... but shelter workers don't compile statistics for the CDC you fucking retard
>STUDY #2: 62% OF PITBULL-TYPE DOGS HAVE LESS THAN 50% DNA
Okay, so pitbulls are not only violent, but they're violent mongrels. Cool.
>When accounting for the fact that 62% of dogs with pitbull-type DNA have less than a 50% DNA concentration from pitbull-type ancestry (and are therefore by definition mixed breed dogs), the 26% result (calculated from study #1) is further reduced by more than half
That's genuinely laughable. It's not the DNA doing the attacks, it's the dogs.
>There are four unique breeds commonly classified as the modern pitbull-type breeds. Therefore, the 10% total (calculated from study #2) for all pitbull-type breeds combined can be estimated to be around 2.5% for each of the four unique pitbull-type breeds.
They're *all* fucking pitbulls though. Why would you take them all in isolation? What's gained by doing that? This is blatant obfuscation, describing 100 pitbull attacks as "well ackshually it's only 25 American Pitbull, 25 American Staffie, 25 American Bulldog and 25 Staffy Bull Terrier attacks!" still means there's 100 pitbull attacks