Are there any actual arguments against walkable cities?

Are there any actual arguments against walkable cities?

Attached: 3-Walkable-Cities-and-what-to-wear-–-SF-Copenhagen-Lisbon-Saucony-offset_337986-1.jpg (1640x1250, 363.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CTV-wwszGw8
youtu.be/uxykI30fS54?t=269
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

in before carfag seething

until we reopen the mental institutions and start imprisoning the homeless against their will, we can't have these

Unironically this, too many fucking crackheads

Wont work in america due to n-people.

Cars are the most destructive invention in history.

>Are there any actual arguments against walkable cities?
me and my car is a pretty good argument if you know what's good for you and don't wanna have to eat out of a straw

Not having them gives us rent-free space in Europeon’s heads.

Anything that makes Euros asspained is worth it.

I don't care about you city fags. Just let me have my car.

>Are there any actual arguments against walkable cities?

Niggers.

Attached: U9aeefd90b3854a29a439fc679ceb32cdP.jpg (462x820, 78.93K)

No argument against them just as there is no argument against driver-friendly cities. If they are already built then its no real use in trying to drastically change them. perhaps it would be preferable to build NEW cities, but then it would run into the same problems as rebuilding current ones

Imagine worrying about walkable cities when the US is hitting 50% non-whites with Europe fighting to catch up.

Attached: blade runner.jpg (1020x1024, 140.97K)

I don't want to see your ugly nigger face as I'm walking around

Most people will never understand what city life can be. It's hard to imagine how good it is when it is good. they'll never understand being able to walk to everything a knowing all your neighbors. it's really great. but there are too many people who shouldn't be alive, who ruin everything with their decay

What do you mean by "walkable city"? I refuse to believe that you can't walk from a point A to a point B in a random US city. If you're talking about compact pedestrian areas, that's also solvable.

Attached: Knez_Mihailova_street_-_panoramio.jpg (2182x3528, 1.01M)

>deletes homeless people
>problem solved

>until we reopen the mental institutions
There are so many fucking crazy people on the street
I'm so glad that they just let these people run loose on the streets

>walkable cities
so basically villages. Nigger do you really wanna go back to the dark ages living in villages and never leaving to see the outside world (except in metavers), eating meat once a month if you are lucky and all that other shit?

>every mugger, crackhead, and murderer in town within walking distance of where your children sleep

Build them if you must, but nobody eill come

The car is the nigger of transportation. Loud, smelly, loiters in the centre all day doing nothing, makes you quickly cross the street when you see one coming.

Will these cities be segmented? Like, one section is the industrial sector, another is residential, one service sector, a retail sector, health sector, etc?

Amsterdam is the gold standard of cities.
youtube.com/watch?v=CTV-wwszGw8

Watch this video, most cities in the US are like this.
youtu.be/uxykI30fS54?t=269

Yeah when I have to walk I notice the trash & filth more easily

I don’t want to live in a shitty, tiny, euro, bugman pod just so I can brag to Americans about how ‘walkable’ my city is

>I refuse to believe that you can't walk from a point A to a point B in a random US city.
I once walked from my suburban home to the nearest train station. it took 2 hours in one direction. about an hour of that was spent waiting at crosswalks so that I could cross 6 lanes of traffic