> Assistant professor at the School of Sociology at UCD, Alexander Kondakov, has been researching law and sexuality in Russia for a number of years, he says Russian president Vladimir Putin represents an outdated kind of masculinity.
> "It is something I hope we are leaving behind,” says the researcher.
> “Remember, last year, James Bond died. For me, it marked the end of a certain type of masculinity.
> "It’s the same with Putin and Putinism. It’s his last song. It’s a cruel song with a lot of bloodshed. But that’s it.”
> “Putinism is based on revanchism. It is based on an image of a strong powerful man with outdated ideas about relationships between people, including gender relationships. "
> In that world of masculinity, there’s no space for non-heterosexuality. Opposing the West in its support for LGBT rights with Russia’s ‘family values’ became a cornerstone of his politics pictured as a civilisational watershed.
He's not masculine though? Gay men licking other hairy muscular gay men's armpits are masculine. Putin is a weird ugly fat fuck with a weird accent. If he was manly he would be at the gym and would have sex with other men.
Andrew Hall
Putin is the exact OPPOSITE of masculine. His type of masculinity lashes out when threatened. Real masculinity can take criticism and integrate that.
David Robinson
what is it with this Brazilian monke who shills for Russia who stinks up every thread he's in? >hurr durr Pootin is RIGHT and JUSTIFIED because of some shit that some dyke on Twatter said holy shit, this is what happens when Any Forums rots your brain. webm related is what happens to dumbass Russians who buy into Putin monke's propaganda, lol
this civilization is crashing in such a way that is fascinating to imagine how we will end up in history books. Unless kikes will hold the presses in the future, of course, as they do now. also imagine being a chink, a middle eastern muzzies, a poo or a ruskie and reading things like that and not think the west is finished.
