at what age have you realised that evolution is unfalsifiable mythology - crucial pillar in nuscience movement and one of the pillars of postmodernism together with (2) nihilism AKA atheism and (3) post-christianity AKA marxism (all 3 the same thing actually).
Discuss.
example of pseudoscientific thinking inspired by evolution
youtube.com
"Evolution is not a testable scientific theory but a metaphysical research program"
K. Popper
Other urls found in this thread:
sciencedaily.com
twitter.com
EPISTEMIOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF EVOLUTION cont
every scientific theory functions in a way it can be disproven if certain facts or theory come out.
Meanwhile, evolution, while being the current paradigm, seems entirely unfalsifiable (Poppers prerequisite for scientific theory). like the test for real witch - If she dies she is probably a witch, if she survives she isnt.
Example 1: if it survives its more adapted (ergo superior), if it doesnt its less adapted (ergo inferior). That kind of logic should also apply to human races so if whitey dies, he actually wasnt the masterrace, if he survives he actually is. This is mythology and circular reasoning, not scientific reasoning.
Example 2: "useless human body parts". Appendix and wisdom teeth are considered an evolutionary relic...until few years ago when appendix was discovered to be very usefull for keeping gut bacteria. Wisdom teeth? Idk I still have them.
sciencedaily.com
In the end theory of evolution doesnt predict anything like a good sci theory should, but explains things backwards.
discuss.
bump
Evolution is simply the process of imperfect replications of offspring, especially if the species has more than just a single parent. Some of these are going to be more, or less capable of living in particular environments
>Evolution is simply the process of imperfect replications of offspring,
you mean natural selection?
what are vestigial human body parts and how do you scientifically test for vestigiality?
>(all 3 the same thing actually).
By what metric because you're wrong
pretty simple, atheism, marxism and evolution all come from Hegel.
Yes, and if we were all carbon copies of our parents natural selection would do little. Consider how some people are born with exceedingly rare mutations like a african who is an Albino, a complete lack of melanin in the equator is a bad thing. However if this hypothetical black person and their family lived somewhere closer to the poles he would have a distinct genetic advantage in the area due to his mutation, that is evolution
No they don't you ignorant moron. None of them are mutually exclusive. All atheism means is a response to a claim.
>that is evolution
Evolution just means change over time, sometimes a very long period of time
>EPISTEMIOLOGICAL CRITIQUE
In the trash that subjective garbage goes
Darwin went looking for God and couldn't find it, so he fell back on evolutionary theory as the reason.
You can't find god by measuring things as science does.
(I am not in any way religious. )
>No they don't you ignorant moron. None of them are mutually exclusive.
are you on some gay drugs that made your brain retarded? I said clearly that Hegel was the creator of the 3 mentioned and they compliment each other.
Which god? Why is it one?
>I said clearly that Hegel was the creator of the 3
And you're wrong you dumb faggot
The one most people had forced upon them, the biblical one.
>that subjective garbage
what are you on again you twat? Epistemiology=methodology of knownledge
>And you're wrong you dumb faggot
A response of a half educated tit.
Thanks for demonstrating my point for me
>A response of a half educated tit.
days the faggot who CAN'T DEMONSTRATE
>when I evolve, I want to be a nigger
Holy shir go outside
No. Bad genetics replicate just as much as good. This is called dysgenics.
> if whitey dies, he actually wasnt the masterrace
Quite unironically yes.
>theism, marxism and evolution
Yea they are all part of reductionism, and dialecetical materialism .Your just uneducated.
> Bad genetics replicate just as much as good
If they manage to replicate, then why are they "bad"?
Ye must have faith at the temple of science - Max Planc
>Bad genetics replicate just as much as good.
correct, today bad genes replicate more than good, but according to evolution, there is no bad or good just better adapted (which is unfalsifiable circular nonsense)
Being too dumb/indoctrinated to understand/accept something therefore deciding it's false is Any Forums in a nutshell. If you want a real discussion you shouldn't bring atheism or nihilism in it. Science is not about what you want to believe, it's about what's truth.
Your example 1: Evolution can't really be applied to modern human societies. Neanderthals didn't disappear because of evolution. If something happen to some ethnicities now it wouldn't be because of Evolution. Also Nature doesn't control our evolution anymore, it's the environment we created that do.
Your example 2: Knowledge isn't static, of course science can be wrong until we understand something better, it doesn't use dogmas like religions. The appendix is a good example of that. But what about the tailbone, the third eyelid, the useless muscles around the ears, goose bumps ?
Demonstrate how
There is a sticky on the frontpage of Any Forums, you should go check it out and REALLY pay attention to it, especially the strawman part.
You are so epicly wrong about everything its hard for me to take you seriously, surely you are just trolling, please tell me this is just dishonesty and not straight up retardation.
Replication does not = good. Thats your claim, not mine.
Then "bad" by what measure?
Usually evolution is a slow change over many generations. However using a extreme example like the one i said is still a valid one of evolution
because it leaves the population vulnerable to extinction.
for example: early homonids used to genocide the living shit out of eachother.
I am retired. I really do not need to work. No thanks.
>but according to evolution, there is no bad or good just better adapted (which is unfalsifiable circular nonsense)
Wong. You are fucking moron
Dysgenics is well understood. Bad diets lead to dysgenic outputs such as lower bone density. You can start with Pottingers cats.
>I can't demonstrate, rather I make shit up online
Lol
What do you mean "bad" genetics? If they succesfully replicated, it means they're not bad, right?
Volontiers.
>Bad diets
Diet is not genetic, user...
Evolution is retardation. It's not even close to science. Whether or not our present diversity of species can be explained by evolution is not a question the scientific method can be applied to because we don't have the millions of years necessary to run the experiment.
What about the idea the Cambrian explosion puts too much life diversity in place to make it a mathematical impossibility?
If you can't understand that evolution, marxism, and such are part of a reductionism and dialectical materialism than you are prob poor, and not retired, and thus need to put the work in. If you want someone to work for you, you need to pay them for the work, at the cost they request. What are you a poor marxist? Yes.. thus your worship of reductionism and dialectal materialism.
>Evolution can't really be applied to modern human societies.
so it doesnt have a purpouse?
>Knowledge isn't static, of course science can be wrong until we understand something better
you cant prove evolution wrong, everything can fit, just like in Critical race theory, its entirely UNFALSIFIABLE.
>Wong. You are fucking moron
that is EXACTLY how a person with an evolutionary demon would respond!
>What do you mean "bad" genetics? If they succesfully replicated, it means they're not bad, right?
That is post-hoc pseudoscientific reasoning used by evolution, wait for something to happen then explain, unlike in science when you use PREDICTIONs based on empiricism and hypothesis.
I have a degenerative eye disease in both my eyes. Its hereditary which means it can be passed on to offspring
>I still can't demonstrate
Lol
Diet has epigenetic relationship with genetics. Its the foundation of all fitness/ health and what could be positive eugenic outputs or negative dysgenic outputs. Again, you can start with Pottingers cats. Considering you do not know this, your prob dysgenic, and eat 12 servings of carbs a day, like most dysgenic slave caste have since before summeria.
Evolution doesn't make logical sense. Evolutionary science asks us to believe animals of different genotypes arise from one another. This is not possible. There can be variations within a species, but on the whole, they are the same animal. Bridges between species do not exist and separate species do not arise spontaneously from one another. Like things ALWAYS produce like things. If you went back to the animal where the chromosome was "fused" in what is referred to a "Robertsonian Translocation," the mother could not bear offspring different from herself. The mother and her offspring would have the same number of chromosomes. They would be the same animal. Evolution is complete nonsense. It is just the theory of spontaneous generation put in organic terms over a longer timeline. Prove me wrong.
>that is EXACTLY how a person with an evolutionary demon would respond
When you invoke nonsesne like demons in your response then you certify how much of a moron you are
You were not there to witness this. Sceince starts with being able to witness and observe. This is called empiricism. If you can portray the past so perfect, millions of years ago. Than why don't you use those powers to bet on the market 5 days from now, and make millions?
Poor people think that people work for free. Its a curse of the poor dysgenic carbohyrdate caste who have been ruled by kings in walled gardens for eons. You will never have the abstraction of pastoral genes.
>evolution, marxism, and such are part of a reductionism and dialectical materialism
and all of them are circular and UNFALSIFIABLE, just its theoretical offspring of critical theory, race theory and other non-theoretical but semantical ideas
>When you invoke nonsesne like demons in your response then you certify how much of a moron you are
but that is EXACTLY how a person with an evolutionary demon would respond when faced with its diagnosis. Evolutionary demon possession is a serious issue of our time.
Yes there are no bridges between species, and Whole genomic sequencing has more fraud in it than the shitcoin market.
Genetic variation is the presence of differences in sequences of genes between individual organisms of a species. It enables natural selection, one of the primary forces driving the evolution of life
user... Obviously if you take two organisms with identical genetics, and feed one of them a high-quality diet while the other gets a garbage diet, then of course you will see differences, which may potentially even carry over to the next generation. But it has nothing to do with evolution. Where did this argument even come from?
How does it feel writing these long posts? Posts that take you so long to write, but that few will ever read? Posts that will be deleted in three days, and when they are, it will be like they were never ever written. Is that what you do with your life? Is that what you want to do with your life?