US CIVIL WAR

Makes sense. I guess the whole southern = redneck simpleton propaganda is also a part of the classic information warfare.

yeah im sorry I wont be able to contribute much more atm, and Im sorry Any Forums is drowning in shills right now too

It was really federalism vs state rights. Lincoln was a piece of shit faggot who deserved a bullet.

Yes I was and yes I do care, memeflag shill faggot. I learned a whole lot of interesting things, it's amazing really how France and Spain lost/sold all of their territories.

Lincoln wanted to limit slavery to the states that already had it and ban it from new territories/states because it undermined white labor and was a shit economic model to operate under in general. Southerners sperged out and thought Lincoln was going to completely ban slavery which was false (Lincoln said he'd make the Fugitive Slave Act stronger and crack down on radical abolitionists like John Brown) and they rebelled and got BTFO.

Racist, treasonous hicks tried to destroy america over their hatred of black folks, that's all there is to it.

It was actually about getting rid of the vampire threat. You see, I watched this documentary about how Abraham Lincoln knew all the confederates were bloodsucking demons and he single-handedly tried to kill all of them. It was actually his entire reason for getting into politics. But they got him in the end and the vampires are still out there to this day

Thanks at least for some responses, I just wanted some opinions to further feed my own research. Shills are in full force since covid and now Ukraine, it's tiresome.

It was about slavery from an economic side, then states' rights, then slavery as an institution. Basically, Northern economic policies conflicted heavily with the Southern economic model, and Southerners felt robbed.

I always knew about John Wilkes Booth killing him but before I started reading up on it I never knew he was actually a well-known actor who killed him in a theatre, pretty interesting fact lol.

>Was it really about slavery
The south got rid of slavery before the north did. The north then went on to genocide Native Americans and enslave chinese rail workers.

A child could answer your question OP you complete fucking retard.

>whole southern = redneck simpleton
Southern states have a shit ton of blacks so just looking at raw numbers the south looks low IQ but when that's said the demographics are conveniently never mentioned.

He was a jew and his actions made things far worse, bad enough that lincoln burned the south to the ground but then the plan to send the niggers to their own carribean colony died with him. We got the worst possible outcome across the board.

Its was not about slavery.

The south legally seceded and the north kept military tax collection forts in the south anyway.

Fort sumpter was a tax collection port inside southern territory that was sending ships to stop southern ones.

The north started the war by refusing to recognize sovereignty.

>it undermined white labor
How, can you explain? It seems like a pretty sustainable economic model. Whites were performing more technical jobs and blacks more simple work, no?
>thought Lincoln was going to completely ban slavery
Well he did, that's pretty much what emancipation proclamation did, no?...I suppose he said only in free states will they be forever free, but if you then want to make all states free...
Gonna read up on the Fugitive slave act and John Brown.

Why does Any Forums like this participation ribbon of a flag again?

The South has always been the most conservative region of the US. The South seceded because they saw the shifting cultural currents in the North and wanted no part of it.

Attached: thornwell.png (1600x900, 169.51K)

Well it's always possible and maybe even probable that it was all by design, hence why I was asking if some of the leaders of the confederates were masons...it has that kind of a masonic/jewish handywork written over it

>How, can you explain? It seems like a pretty sustainable economic model. Whites were performing more technical jobs and blacks more simple work, no?
Slavery is literally free labor. If you're just a normal white guy that's below upper middle class, you get screwed over hard. Read up on the Free Soil movement.

>Well he did, that's pretty much what emancipation proclamation did, no?
The Emancipation Proclamation didn't really free any slaves because the war was still going on, it was more of a political move to sink the Confederacy's chances of getting support from abroad in Europe.

Jacob Stroyer wrote a memoir about it. He was freed after the Civil War. The tldr is that it was bad but not nearly as bad as Tariq Nasheed closet homo nigger types act like it was.

docsouth.unc.edu/neh/stroyer85/stroyer85.html

It's actually a great book. Extremely funny, extremely human. It's just a collection of stories from around the plantation and from his life, some hilarious, some tragic. He was present as a laborer on a coastal artillery fort that was hit by heavy fire during the war and describes some insane shit like seeing another slave take a direct hit from a small Parrott rifle and get exploded into shreds. It's wild.

Jews vs Jews.
Jews in the north wanted more Black people to be forcefully integrated into white neighborhoods, while plantation Jews wanted to keep their multitudes of black slaves. Reminder that while permanent slavery was a black practice at first, the Jews adopted it so they could drive their competitors out of the cotton cropping buisness. When slavery was legal in the contiguous US, the Jews piled the blacks into the US as a way of getting around the requirement of the original US immigration to citizenship system being that they had white people.
To start the Civil War, which was actually a War of Secession, they puppeted the economic abuses made by the North to justify the separation to the commoners and educated of the South alike. While in actuality they were biding time until the war was in swing and they used the local and major papers to drive a false moral dichotomy of Abolitionism vs Slavery in the North because keeping the US together for tactical reasons was not acceptable in the constitution but public opinion of a moral good could be a justification to continue a war of denying the secession of states. Meanwhile in the South, the Jewish slave plantationers just had to sit back and draft dodge while they used the papers to sway public opinion by reminding them of the unjust Northern invasions of the new South to bolster the cause. They knew it wouldn't work, but they got the South's industry destroyed and plenty of white people on both sides to die, meanwhile the papers sway Northern opinion again as abolition gets corrupted into Pro-Integration, and so now that the North has occupied the defeated South, the Northern Jews could enforce pro-integration, which meant that Southern blacks, now citizens, could not be exported, but they could be abused as sharecroppers to the same Jews that bought them in the first place.

It really was about slavery.
Southern states thought blacks were subhuman and wanted to bring them as slaves to the Territories and new States.
Northern states thought blacks were subhuman and wanted to keep them out of the Territories and new States.
Northern states figured the best way to accomplish this was to violate the 5th amendment in various ways.