Why are we so afraid of these again? They're just big bombs.
>b-b-but the fallout! t-t-the radiation!
Chernobyl is safe. Fukushima is safe. Looks to me like "muh poisoning the land for thousands of years" is just a big meme!
Why are we so afraid of these again? They're just big bombs
Nathan Johnson
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Alexander Johnson
i'm pretty sure you can't live in chernobyl currently. But it depends how low to the ground they detonate a nuclear bomb. If they drop one and just let it hit the ground there'll be fallout everywhere for years. They're usually detonated really high in the atmosphere, like a kilometre or two and the fallout mostly goes upwards higher into the atmosphere and doesn't really come down
Jace Miller
>fukushima is safe
Kek
Ryder Jenkins
Nukes are fear porn, fake and gay.
James Diaz
Hunter Ramirez
Shut up schlomo, Nevada had 900 times more nuclear tests than chernobyl and NOBODY was ever evacuated and its perfectly safe to this day...your nukes are a jew lie
James Morales
there's so much footage of exploding nuclear weapons. Hundreds of videos
Luis Ramirez
OMG
A NUKE
GOVERNMENT PLS SAVE USSSSS
Angel Adams
Probably true. Fallout from a normal bomb will have the area be livable again within not that many years, and the nuclear winter theory has come under a lot of criticism over the years. The total annihilation nuclear wasteland thing is just a meme
Evan Ramirez
>When underground explosions ended in 1992, the Department of Energy estimated that more than 300 megacuries (11 EBq) of radioactivity remained in the environment at that time, making the site one of the most contaminated locations in the United States
>A significant excess of leukemia deaths occurred in children up to 14 years of age living in Utah between 1959 and 1967. This excess was concentrated in the cohort of children born between 1951 and 1958, and was most pronounced in those residing in counties receiving high fallout
en.wikipedia.org
Daniel Adams
You can't live there because you're not allowed to, animals started moving back in a while ago and they left before they humans did.
Alexander Hughes
no, i mean you couldn't live there even if you were allowed to without likely dying of cancer. I guess technically you could live there but you would have an unnaturally shorter life
Caleb Robinson
fake and gay, checked but nukes are fake
Samuel Ortiz
There are people living in the Chernobyl area to this day. People who never left. Is it safe? Some areas are, overall it isn't.
Joseph Rodriguez
>jewpedia
Not a source
William Ortiz
the sources are the references they reference
Ryan Williams
Currently there are 13080 nukes in the world (not all of which are active) so we have enough nukes to affect 1.5% of earths dry land. Ofcourse thats for all total nukes, and that is the whole blast area, half of which is just breaking windows. The thermal radiation would cover 0.75% of earths dry land if all nukes hit. Realistically, with multiple nukes targeted at the same location and nucler dfenses taking out atleast half of all nukes, that woudl be 0.375% of earths dry land. That coveres 15% of urban areas. Since 55% of humanit lives in urban areas that would hit 600000000 people. Ofcourse most nukes would be targeting military targets and nuk sylos, only about 10% would be targeted at prestiege targets like big cities. So that makes 60000000 people. And ofcourse only 31% of those nukes are active. That leaves about 18 million people. About half of which is from the east, and half from the west. So about 9 million western people would be killed in a nuclear war. Which would suck, but it would by no means be the end of the world or civilisation.
Ayden Garcia
>The total annihilation nuclear wasteland thing is just a meme
A nuclear war would wipe out almost all civilian electronic devices in targeted areas. If there are ground bursts, which there will be, then even just a couple of these are enough to throw up enough dust into the atmosphere to significantly blacken the sky. Will it be an artificial winter? Perhaps not. But remember that volcano eruptions have in the past been enough to lower the earth's temperature for a couple of years.
The total annihilation will not come directly from horrible living conditions, but the widespread famine that will hit a few weeks after the disaster. First from the incapacitated transport sector that's been wiped out by the EMP and second by the lack of new food being grown.
Liam White
Sources 16 and 17 are jewish news articles and 18 is incomplete data gathering that seem to conclude all the plant life grew back to normal between 1960 and 1980.
Another case of JIDF putting whatever they want on jewpedia and "sourcing" it with jew written news articles.
Jayden James
Can someone post the target map
Adam Kelly
Yep.
Thread/
Mason Reed
The same effect can be caused by a few tons of TNT user. That video footage doesn't prove shit. Believe me, I wish nukes were real. But for that matter I wish viruses were real too. Unfortunately, if they were real, terrorist organizations like Israel would have used them by now.
David Ross
Fucking retard!
Ryan Richardson
Nuclear war doesn’t seem that bad, when you put it like that. Would be pretty funny to see some Amerifat cities be destroyed. No ones going to notice any difference from Chink cities. Hopefully they don’t target anywhere in Scotland. Maybe Coulport and Faslane bases but I’m a good 30 miles from there. Fingers crossed it’s not a huge nuke!
Nathan Campbell
It was largely Soviet propaganda. Did you know the Soviet Union didn't have toilet paper until like the 1970s? The toilet-paperless Soviet Union would not have fared well against the toilet-paper abundant US.