6 generals killed in 30 days. There are nothing comparative in history. Is Russia based or retarded? Unironically...

6 generals killed in 30 days. There are nothing comparative in history. Is Russia based or retarded? Unironically, this is a serious question.

Attached: file.png (1336x769, 2.3M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/ucEs0nBuowE
youtube.com/watch?v=ZU1f47SC_A8
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Clearly, the Generals men betrayed them in exchange for bitcoin.

They lost 16 admirals in a single plane crash in the 80s.

>“oh no the army with 2 million soldier lost 6 people they lost the war oh no whatisputingonnado“

Attached: AEE5612D-321A-4BC1-A125-8B19009B56EB.jpg (250x241, 6.88K)

A general in the Russian army is basically the equivalent to a cook in the American one.

Attached: 1647801620984m.jpg (512x1024, 82.38K)

Putin is retarded, not Russia. They just need a leader who wasn’t a former communist kgb agent

all part of the plan Z user said so

Hmm.. source? Because I have $1078 in buttcoin. I will not redeem it.

I’m just a fucking leaf brainlet. But this reeks of a purge.
>off the corrupt general innawoods
>Holols find corpse
>”how did make u feel russo boi?”

Some young looking generals are probably a loss, but some of them looked like old farts who probably still fight like its 1985, so more competent people are coming in their place, so its for the better.

or the Generals using the conflict to fake their deaths to become Generals or shadow the shadow army.
Think about it, Putin is ex KGB he might pull shit like this.

Battle of Kiev 1941
Battle of Kiev 1943
It’s all just history repeating itself

>6 generals killed
It's actually 7 dead generals as of today

Attached: 20220325_192402.jpg (1376x1050, 294.51K)

Make their murders look like combat deaths and tell the nation they died for the motherland as heroes. Or a Rommel situation.

>6 generals killed in 30 days
During stalin's purges generals were killed far more rapidly

Can someone explain to me what are generals doing in the battlefields? Aren't they supposed to be in strategic command far away?

conscripts are expendable, the leaders and commanders are not. Losing 6 in such a short period is extreme failure to say the least.

The question still stands.

Anybody find it odd it's just the Ministry of Defence losing them?

Why haven't the National Guard, MVD, FSB, or SVR lost any?

10 US pesos commies will shot it down in less than 45 min? It's packed with Turk-o-matic drones

Attached: file.png (1044x755, 1.05M)

They were having command and communication issues from early on, along with low morale. Russia moved the generals closer to the front lines to try and fix these problem but Ukranian snipers just kept picking them off

This. It's extremely odd, unless people are getting ranks missed up. I can understand field officers, like colonels, getting offed out there, but full blown generals?

zero chance that happens

Identify yourself.

In first world militaries the leaders are out in the field with the troops they lead into battle. Even if they are not on the front line or in a forward operating base, they are close by to direct logistics and quickly understand the situation so decisions can be quickly rendered. A good general will be within 2 hours of the front line, regardless of what that actually means; 2 hours by foot is a much shorter distance than 2 hours by truck and is much shorter than 2 hours by supersonic jet - this plays heavily into command post placement.

If the general is far away, removed or isolated from the situation good observations are unlikely to occur and large errors are likely. The entire first world war is a good example of that, with generals in literal castles commanding thousands of people to their deaths in cold, muddy, cholera-infected trenches. Ditto for America's Green Zones in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Imperial Life In The Emerald City is a good description of when all of this goes wrong, and vice versa most successful American battles can trace it to a local command staff/general who was in the right place at the right time to make the right decisions.

In shithole countries like yours the general sits in the capital all day with the ruling party/leader while secret police and intelligence services order infantry around. This usually fails and explodes violently when infantry walk away from their job without permission.

>“oh no the army with 2 million soldier lost 6 people they lost the war oh no whatisputingonnado“
when the allies bombed the HQ of German armored corps the German response to D-Day landings was delayed by 3 weeks

>2 million

Well, look at that!

Attached: Generals.jpg (680x650, 51.89K)

It's a near peer war and one that is in lands Russia claims as their own. Of course they will have generals on site, or at least close by, to deal with local municipalities, civil governments, and utility needs as the transition occurs. All smart governments have a plan for this and generals need to be there to ensure important decisions are made using honest data and are made quickly. Delays in war do not ever benefit the aggressor, except in sieges ala Berlin or Mariupol. In Russia's case delays merely cause confusion and chaos which undermines support for the invasion by the civilian population Russia aims to control. This greatly increases the chances of defeat.

>become Generals or shadow the shadow army
real life isn't a video game you fucking retard

7

an action that cost them the entire war because the smart commanders were dead, and by the time replacements had come in the allies already had a secured beachhead and forward airbases.

source?

Judging by skill? Yes
But they are still the best russian society has to offer

this could have been a purge.
youtu.be/ucEs0nBuowE

zero?

Attached: file.png (726x565, 580.22K)

>Is Russia based or retarded?
A bit of both. In this war? Mostly retarded.

Attached: 1648234595414.jpg (1000x666, 155.23K)

Attached: file.png (465x503, 171.77K)

youtube.com/watch?v=ZU1f47SC_A8
How about 16 admirals in a single accident?