A problem with autistic, right wing, and incel thought may be disconnection from eros and overfocus on logos...

1. I dont understand what you mean by this. Involuntary sex is rape. Involuntary non-sex is rejection. Rape is not a good solution to the problem of the incel and the incel rejects rape.
2. See my previous post about binary thinking.
3. I have only read about 100 pages of Jung so far, but he justifies this with reference to the collective unconscious, which is the unconscious archetypes that reocurr in dreams and fantasies universally without being taught. This is his basis for concluding that the psyche is not all that "personal" and differentiated.

Kek autocorrect
Who is talking about money?

No....
> the use of the word incel mocks people for what is being done to them (being rejected). In this way, it is an act of violence, finding pleasure in both the misfortune of others.
> so when you mock someone as being an "incel" you are signaling the value of forcing your sexual will on other.
> I don't blame you for being a rape apologist; people probably never spelled it out to you.

Its about money, feminism Is about more workers and more buyers.

Yes, but I think we can all agree with Hillary Clinton that in war, it's the woman waiting at home who suffer the most

an incel can be so not by being rejected but by not having the balls to go for it despite his cravings. And although it certainly originated from pure schadenfreuden it quickly became a term that's also applied without malice.
>you are signaling the value of forcing your sexual will on other
wut, explain

A quote so clear that even Snopes couldn't find any wiggle room:
snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-victims-of-war/

I think you can see a similar situation with people who "go on diets" or try to quit some other addiction and end up relapsing. Most sissy or interracial stuff centers on "submission" to an extreme extent. If someone percieves femininity as inherently weak and rejects it then they are trying to suppress a part of themselves, that will end up expressing itself somehow

1. In what way is rejection violence?
2. I am not mocking anyone.
3. You are conflating rape, violence, and rejection.
Who is talking about feminism?
This is what I am saying. I feel like I had to go to the extremes of the fetishesI mentioned to expose myself to the thoughts I am having and give myself the drive to seek help in Jung, and so far it has been enlightening, if what he says is for real. Another thing our milieu seems to do is discourage shadow exploration through moral purity signaling, sexual repression, and paternalistic minimization and ridicule of risk-taking. There always come times when the erotic drive overcomes the logical spirit of a man, and by hating the shadowy eros, people end up without understanding or control of it. I'm not evangelizing my sexual preferences (which feel somewhat involuntary) by any means, but saying that perhaps we should not be afraid to explore our darkest erotic inclinations within the "safe space" of fantasy. This is a confrontation with myself that I put off for so long because I thought it was immoral, but my sexuality became very warped in the process.

OP, what do you hope to accomplish from this when you yourself have not entirely read through any one work from Jung, as you have stated on this post
>I have only read about 100 pages of Jung so far
This isn't a forum dedicated to Jungian Analytic Psychology and you haven't yourself read through his works. Therefore, you're working with an incomplete notion of his works while trying to use it as an authority as to why 'autistic, right wing, and incel thought' is fallacious.
First, you put them all together, which is a mistake as you have numerous Marxist materialists that have the same issues which you ascribe to the right (that being a hyperfocus on material reality rather than emotion).
Secondly, many rightists are heavily invested in eros, as can be seen in the Romantic movements of the 19th century, which coincided with Bourgeois nationalism (which is presently part of right wing thought, though it was considered 'left' of reactionary monarchism in its day).
I would recommend that you read more Jung and then come back after that. I would also recommend reading the works of Julius Evola and Rene Guenon.

Relapsing also features heavily in the fetishization of porn addiction, which has a lot of spillover with interracial and sissy genres, as pic related shows (warning: this may burn your eyes). It is insightful to say that this is repressed femininity mixed with shame over femininity mixing to create a self-destruction fetish. Adding the autistic tendency towards all-or-nothing thinking into the mix intensifies this into more extreme forms of fetishism, potentially. I have often heard in the past that it is masculine men and successful businessmen that are the main clientele of dominatrixes, and it makes perfect sense because these men are likely to be highly repressive of their femininity.

Attached: FJ_NyioXMAEIZ7X.jpg (622x622, 75.24K)

you talk like a fucking homo

>discourage shadow exploration
it's just an extreme reaction to the shadow exploitation of the status quo -- ridiculing the anima/eros and
>shadowy eros
is a way to force the pendulum to get closer to us, the logos army.
Fugg this sounded so e. michael jonesy

>This isn't a forum dedicated
you mean board, newfag. and Any Forums can have off-topic threads if they're well reasoned and this one is way above the avg nu/pol/ slider. His question is simple and the jungian concepts he employed until now arent incorrect. So I'm giving my blessing to OP and if you sage it I'll murder you in your sleep.

You imply we are alienated from normies against our will when in reality they have been alienated from us in accordance with our wishes. I'd rather converse with a literal chimpanzee than normie NPC liberals.

I am not using Jung as an authority to attack anyone. I am asking questions. I consider myself to be autistic, right wing, and somewhat of an incrl myself. I am trying to understand the insights I have gotten from my limited reading of young, see if people agree with them, and if they are sound, share them with people who might also benefit from it, as Any Forums is an intellectual milieu that formed much of my worldview and I know these kinds of characters are all over the place here. I think we need to understand ourselves to understand the world, because the world we are in is comprised of many selves. I am wondering if increasing our compassion might not increase our effectiveness, and increasing our self-understanding might not increase our understanding of others. I am talking about the right as it is today, not the right of the 1800's.
I like men and women sexually but I prefer women. I think I "chose" to be bisexual by being open to it and seeking out guys who were feminine enough to get my dick hard back when I was a teenager and I thought I could get "more sex" out of it. That's in the distant past as of now. Nothing I can do about it. And anyway, I saw a stat recently that claims 20% of self-identified straight men look at gay porn, so of that's the case, there are more faggots than niggers in America and its really not that weird. Regardless, I dont fuck dudes and never have, though I am now critical of my sexlessness as indicating a deficit of virility rather than coping about it as s source of moral superiority.

Don't sacrifice anything. Never convert to the dark side. Everything since your conception has been war. A logical person can always learn to be emotional, an emotional person can never learn to be logical. Do not accept weakness, purge the unclean.

You sound gay, OP

You can’t repress anime. That’s a fools errand.

Attached: 706E0BCB-8370-4A56-8B64-EBFB3660486F.gif (500x300, 149.74K)

>You sound gay, OP
Well, you see >I like men and women sexually