The simple question "What is a woman?" has single-handedly destroyed the entire tranny narrative

youtube.com/watch?v=1ZPMS6cSYGQ

So, Any Forums, what *is* a woman, anyway?

Attached: 1645707007164.png (1024x975, 915.93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pQrYQAYmaOk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

A woman is whatever the Jews tell you it is, goy.

Oy vey!

That wasn't too hard was it. Even Google gets it right.

Attached: 3213322.png (572x335, 12.44K)

Woman confirmed

Attached: woman.png (501x558, 46.59K)

You joke but you're right. OP and the other idiots thinking this is somehow a victory for them when nobody cares about their little logic games is just sad.

You are a woman because I say so. Show us your lady parts….

You're missing the point, or choosing to gloss over it entirely.

To acknowledge that the term "woman," or better yet "female," isn't wholly ambiguous, and that to be classified as a female requires key defining features and traits, means that biological males cannot "become" female, because they cannot replicate those key features through surgery or hormone treatment. They literally can't match the definition of "woman," so when you ask them to define the word, they literally go into NPC malfunction mode and blankly stare at you, because the only other option is to betray the fantasy-laden belief that men can be women and women can be men, by admitting that there's even a difference in the first place.

Attached: 1617081114354.jpg (1024x789, 140.89K)

>What is a woman
i am a woman, no amount of mental gymnastics on your part will change that

Attached: 7c61b3d16b4032032111b214137db2eb.jpg (564x564, 47.57K)

If you were born female, then indeed you are.

If not, then well, I got bad news for ya.

What defines whether one is "female"?

Post pics of your cock

Generally, a female reproductive system is the most telling feature: an ability to produce eggs, get pregnant, nurture a fetus in the womb, etc...

You could also mention gametes, chromosomes, and the like, but that tends to go over most people's heads, and they try to bring up extremely rare exceptions like herms to deboonk the idea of 2 sexes, as if that's the rule and not the exception, when they very well know that's not the case.

youtube.com/watch?v=pQrYQAYmaOk

Attached: 1647277878255.png (872x807, 601.8K)

Some sense from a fellow leaf. The left has won for decades without being "logical", and conservatards think of all a sudden they're going to be permanently owned now?

Attached: bill clinton is.gif (320x240, 2.24M)

Conservatives in politics have a heavy tendency to back off like complete pussies when any pressure is applied on them to do so. The only reason the left has "won" with their backwards logic is because nobody is pressing them on it. The politicians representing the "right" at levels that actually matter are fucking cowards.

Yes and the same thing will happen here. Conservatives will back off under under scrutiny over their opposition to trans rights as well. An Indiana republican just vetoed a bill about keeping trannies out of women's sports, yet they pander to their base with meaningless dog whistling that their actions contradict.

Indeed. Until enough people start raising their voices about this shit, it's going to go completely unacknowledged by our "representatives." I fear that this will eventually lead to wrong (in the most literal sense) legal precedencies being set as a result. And once that happens, it's very, very difficult to come back from.

Maybe that's what it'll take for people to take their heads out of their fat, smelly asses and start giving a shit, though.

They are going to fix that soon. It's a bigoted definition. If a nigger SC Justice can't define it, nobody can. Trust the science