There is nothing in the Washington treaty that would "void" your rights to invoke article 5.
An attack on peacekeepers in Ukraine would not constitute an attack on NATO as outlined in article 6 of the Washington treaty.
Sending peacekeepers to Ukraine does not remove your rights to invoke article 5 should your country be invaded
Other urls found in this thread:
nato.int
twitter.com
I know it is all staged.
I know Putin is another NWO vassal.
I know.
But Im starting to wish Poland gets nuked at this point.
If Poland was the aggressor, no other members are obligated to come to their aid
Article 5 has never been tested against a formidable foe. You'd probably see nations cuck out like what happened during WW2 with security agreements
Russia did not declare any war so neither Poland have to and they still can kill each others. :D
There are no polish troops at that area. Only polish citizens with heavy arms. The world is full of magic.
>should your country be invaded
No shit, but it does not apply to troops you send on "peacekeeping" missions in non-NATO territoires as the snippet you posted says
It means you can attack polish troops and gear, without the rest of NATO can do anything about it
Why, Argentina, why? Is it because of your SS grandfather that had to escape to your land?
What do you base that on?
Fuck. We're heading towards World War 3 for real this time aren't we?
keked and checked.
Nah not at all. It the willingness of every government to play their part in the theater and how for some reason Poland out of them all is desperate to outdone every other globohomo vassal state.
Article 5 itself
>Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.
Nowhere does it mention that nato members have to defend a country that started a war.
Accorging to international law Russia has the right to attack/retaliate on countries that have shipped weapons to Ukraine for the purpose of attacking/killing Russians. There has been debates about in in Norway. Russia has the right to retaliate against Norwasy, Swedn, Finland, EU, Germany, USA, UK etc, without it invoking article 5, as it an act of retaliation in accordance with international law.
Great job, dummies. That's why everyone is waiting for, and building security, for cyberattacks and other tricky attacks.
Why would they allow a nuclear war? They own the world you just rent.
No. The entire bullshit performance is to make you, me and every other useless eater own less, eat less, live less and eat the bugs.
We're not sending anyone though faggot
>aggressor
say who?
A sovereign country invites other soverign country for a peace keeping mission, Where is the agression?
It's funny how those globalist niggers genuinely think people will just passively accept literally anything they do to them. Like Antoinette, I'm sure they'll keep saying that all the way to the gallows.
>Nowhere does it mention that nato members have to defend a country that started a war.
Article 5 and 6 are clear. NATO countries are obliged to defend countries subject to an "armed attack".
Article 6 elobarets on what constitutes an armed attack: basically an attack on your territorry. (i.e. Polish troops attacked in Ukraine - not article 5 invocable. Polish troops attacked in Poland - article 5 invocable)
Whether or not Poland has declared war or sent peacekeepers somehwere does not impact this right
>Like Antoinette,
Ah but they did learn from pass mistakes, thats why now we have meat puppets that will take the blame in the worst case scenario.
True, but I think it ultimately doesn't matter. The ideas pushed by the globalist niggers are only ever associated with their patsies. Once the 99% revolt and slay the nigger pawns, the ideas that caused the crises die with them. They get away, but the ruinous effects they brought about are dismantled and the people are immunized against them for a time, leaving them entirely toothless. In an imperfect world like ours I think that's the best you can do.
One of the core founding principles of NATO is the idea of “collective defense”.
This means that if a member decides to take unprovoked offensive actions against a non-NATO nation, the other members have no obligation to join.
Take the 2003 Operation Iraqi Freedom for example. The US tried to justify its rationale to remove Saddam Hussein but several NATO members were not convinced if not outright skeptical of the intelligence claims. The US decided to go at it unilaterally and put pressure on many NATO members to sign up for its “Coalition of the Willing”. Of the other 18 NATO member nations besides the US that were in the alliance at the time, the following nations ended up played a role in the invasion of Iraq.
UK
Italy
Poland
Denmark
Netherlands
Spain
Hungary
Czech Republic
Portugal
Norway
Canada
Several of these nations had clear cut combat roles such as the UK, Italy and Poland. Others had mostly non-combat policing or support roles such as Hungary, Portugal, Norway, Spain and the Czech Republic. As for Canada, it is a bit of a unique case because even though it publicly declared that it won’t participate in the invasion, it refused to disclose the locations of its troops in Iraq or whether its troops were serving alongside US/UK troops in a combat role capacity.
There were also other nations who played a role but were not NATO members at the start of the invasion in 2003 but joined the alliance later on. The list include Estonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Lithuania and Latvia, all of whom joined NATO in 2004. Another participant in the invasion, Albania, joined NATO in 2009.
In short, NATO as a decision making body had no official role in the planning and execution of the 2003 Iraq invasion while certain members such as Germany, France and Belgium were dead set against it and did not participate in any capacity from the very beginning.
Dont think so user. They need to make the cattle destroy their own government and other institutions so they can finally Build Back Better.
NATO had an easy way out of this mess when the rocket hit Zagreb. It was launched from Ukraine. Just invoke atricle 5 cause Ukraine attacked Croatia and invade Ukraine from the west.
Are Poles retarded?