It’s complicated goyim
It’s complicated goyim
Jacob Martin
Other urls found in this thread:
cbsnews.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
John Rogers
>SCIENCE SAYS
Ian Collins
I have such an unbearable hatred for these people
Austin Martinez
Um no sweats, social justice says there is no simple answer
Adrian Sanders
Until the topic of abortion comes up, then all of a sudden it's "Republicans want to CONTROL WOMEN'S BODIES." etc
Men should also start applying to all the female scholarships now.
Gavin Smith
actually the science has been pretty settled for centuries.
Jace Stewart
Two xx chromosomes is a woman, any other definition is either a lie or ignorance/indoctrination. You you don't know the difference between men and women of the human species then you shouldn't be making judgements beyond putting mayo or mustard on a sandwich.
Benjamin Martin
NO SIMPLE ANSWER AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Noah Green
So what, couldn't find an 'expert' to define woman in such a way all your special interest groups are happy, so you moved on to saying 'the science of gender isn't settled'?
Zachary Mitchell
Why is it so hard to accept that the Science behind gender is complicated? How would you define "woman"?
Logan Brown
>liberal judge says liberal thing
Gavin Price
>Two xx chromosomes is a woman
What about xxy?
What about an xy who identifies as a woman in a scientifically valid way that you legally cannot criticize?
Checkmate.
Ian Johnson
Can you point to this science? Or quote it?
Cameron Butler
So shes not the first black woman on the supreme court???
Nathan Evans
Any time I hear “science says” I just tune it out. It’s always some bullshit.
Grayson Russell
Kek
Gavin Thompson
Lol true
Aaron Green
It’s all so tiresome, these media outlets giving reductive and patently false breadcrumbs. They really are willfully malicious, intent to deceive. Meanwhile, leftists think this shit is factual. Sick of them all.
Andrew Hernandez
It actually is slightly complicated due to various kinds of diseases and injuries. It's not someone with ovaries, because women can lose their ovaries to injury or prophylactic surgery. It's not people with XX chromosomes because X0 is a viable karyotype, and there are actually YX females due to the existence of total androgen sensitivity and XX men due to la Chapelle syndrome.
The best, most rigorous criteria I would say is this: A female human must have developed without expression of functional SRY.
Ryan Peterson
And to clarify, nothing I'm talking about has anything to do with "transgenderism" or the concept of mental gender, which is entirely made up. Female is a phenotype, full stop.
Joshua Watson
So she's not sure that she's a woman?
Hudson Hall
It IS people with XX chromosomes you pedantic autist, the rarities you're talking about are so rare that they don't count enough to fuck that up.
Ian Kelly
"Humans are featherless bipeds and women are featherless bideps with a hole" - Plato
Jack Gomez
>Science says
What a fucking retard phrase. Science says? What does that even mean?
Kevin Russell
>it's complicated because of 0.01% of people are different
Absolute retard take tranny, a woman is just an animal born with ovaries, has XX chromosome and to most animals, the capacity to bear offsprings.
Wyatt Baker
The real question is what should a woman be. Everyone knows this though, it's the norm. People pretend like mutants aren't born everyday however. There are people with complicated ambiguous sex characteristics, including mismatched chromosomes, partial/additional genitalia, klinefelter's, hermaphroditism etc. It is complicated but not for the reasons the left say. Is an xxy person with a womb and dead ovaries still a woman? Is the line ever blurred?
Cooper Watson
It's a new religion.
Connor Green
>no simple answer
It's real simple...
>Are you a black woman?
Biden wanted to nom a black woman.
cbsnews.com
James Gomez
>the rarities you're talking about are so rare that they don't count
A definition that doesn't hold up to scrutiny is pointless and can result in the very same kind of nonsense that you're supposed to be opposing. A person with la Chapelle syndrome for example is phenotypically male, but your definition would have them classified as female, creating exactly the kinds of problems that trannies do. Anti-intellectualism and being willfully ignorant is not the way to fight people who are just making shit up to try to justify degeneracy.
Lincoln Hill
>Is an xxy person with a womb and dead ovaries still a woman? Is the line ever blurred?
Why does it matter if it's sterile?
Ryan Adams
youtube.com
Burger bro's this really is your last stand, please don't fail now! You have almost defeated ((((Them))).
They are in a corner now and you can do this!
Cameron Clark
>it's not so simple
it is unless your a retard that doesn't understand normal distributions and why we use them
Joshua Collins
THE science
Jayden Jenkins
Tyler Campbell
No one cares what these ((people)) are saying, stop spreading their retardation
Robert Barnes
>Actually "drinking water" is a misnomer because it contains minerals and other chemicals which are not H20, so technically it isn't water.
Camden Davis
Comparing apples to bowling balls, you dumb fucking nigger. Nobody is asking how to classify people who are perfectly normal. We need a clear demarcation of edge cases. And we have one! Namely, whether or not you developed under the influence of the gene specifically designed to induce male phenotype in the unborn.