I was under the illusion that Russian was a military powerhouse. What happened? Is it the ZOG media not reporting correctly, or is Russia actually this shit? I understand they're trying to minimize civilian casualties, but this is ridiculous. What's your take away from all this?
Not impressed, I must say
Noah Phillips
Isaac Long
>I understand they're trying to minimize civilian casualties, but this is ridiculous.
They're not at all, which makes it even more ridiculous. The Red Army's performance in WWII was based largely on the massive amount of lend-lease shit they got. Without it, they revert to their feudal army nature since time immemorial.
Kayden Jones
The ZOG media is not reporting correctly. If russians had 10% of their ukraine army confirmed KIA there would be way more carnage.
Brandon Long
>The Red Army's performance in WWII was based largely on the massive amount of lend-lease shit they got.
it was based on absorbing the first strike, then hitting the enemy on the counter-attack. same as with Napoleon when Russians marched all the way to Paris even though they were chased out of Moscow a few months earlier.
it seems Russians can't really strike first
Carson Russell
>there would be way more carnage.
And this comparison is based on what? How are you quantifying it?
Aiden Adams
Interesting insights
Colton Sullivan
>I was under the illusion that Russian was a military powerhouse.
The soviet block was...back in 1983 maybe, but now..
where do ppl get this impression from?
David Scott
And those Russkie FAGGOTS will bleed as their precious "war machine" routinely shoots itself in the foot day by day, week by week.
Brayden Howard
Probably from the media. I've always liked at Russia as our biggest military rival, guess that was wrong.
Brody Cooper
Faggots like Nick Fuentes and Richard Spencer: americanfuturist.net
Hudson Watson
>Is it the ZOG media not reporting correctly
That couldn't possibly be it
Hudson Reed
Hi
Sebastian Martinez
There are 12 russian armies advancing on 7 major fronts. There are a limited number of roads to advance on. For Russia to lose almost 1000 killed every day, and a greater number wounded, they would have to be doing constant frontal assaults with all forces. The videos we've seen don't look like that, it's mostly slow urban fighting and convoys picking their way along. There are few multi-day bloodbaths over the same ground and no real air battles. The russians probe all over, but the only places with enough sustained fighting to cause hundreds of KIA are Kiev and Kharkov.
Grayson Ward
>Ukraine is also military powerhouse with metric shitton of ATGM and MANPADS
>Ukraine has NATO intel+spec ops+radar+command+psy ops
>Putin just assumed that less than 1:1 force will suffice, since Ukrainians are not going to fight at all
>Russian AA is nigh useless and heavy artillery is kept at bay to minimize civilian casulties
>Accumulation of corrupted official and yes men in the army
>There is no comparison, war like this (140M vs 40M) wasnt fought for a long time
tl;dr Corruption, political interference and fighting with rocks against paper.
Angel Sanchez
>Is it the ZOG media not reporting correctly
Ukraine is Safe and Effective.
Aaron Roberts
They are trying too hard to avoid civilians.
It slows everything down.
David Roberts
Spencer is anti-Z
He reached his full glow form
Fuentes I have no strong feelings on either way
Brayden Parker
Cope, the truth is the Ukranians light infantry is constantly attacking the Russians with artiller guided by drones and assaulting weak points. This is because the Russians are stuck, having lost 25% of their combat power and not really able to do massive assaults anymore. At 50% they can no longer attack at all
you know fuck all about military and should shut the fuck up on speculations
1800 combat vehicles confirmed lost by the Russians, 30000-40000 dead and wounded is very likely (NATO figures)
oryxspioenkop.com
Carson Thompson
Based Czech saying it as it is.
Angel Hill
>cope
>proceeds to cope
If any of that is true, I'm sure they'll be unable to continue the war any day now.
Aaron Taylor
> citing source known for blatant exaggerations and Ukie propaganda
KEK if you honestly believe those numbers you are mentally retarded beyong salvation, go see a doctor
Christian Roberts
what happened?
1) russian losses are far from what ukrainians claim, even grozev thinks that they ara 5k
2) ukrainian losses are exceeding russian losses, even famous ukrainian tg channels admit their losses are catastrophica, wapo and pentaghon claimed that their losses exceeded 20k as of 16 march
3) ukrainians have numerical superiority - 2,5 to 1
4) they are trying to minimise civilian losses