Can someone explain why wont putin strike poland and nato supply lines?

totally different, ukraine has never been a nato country and always was related to russia. adnd you are missing the point, which is that its not about the legality or morality of the invasion, its about whether the west sees it as a hill worth dying on and starting nuclear war. which they dont, obviously, or othey would have already came to rescue ukraine with the entire nato army. so if putin is so smart and aggressive he would realize that the west has no desire to escalate and putin would put a stop to the proxy war right now by bombing the supply lines from poland that are bringing in the missiles and tank rockets

yes but why does putin draw the line there as acceptable? so putins red line for nato intervention is nato jets in ukraine? but if nato just hands out rocket and missile launchers like candy which kill his forces in the thousands, thats ok? this is why the entire situation makes no sense. ive never seen putin act this cucked before. something is going on that we dont know about i am sure of it

It is pretty entertaining that the west spent years backing neo nazis, far right militias, and mafia/gangs/criminal groups in ukraine and journalists were obsessed with far right militias there from like 2010ish to 2016 roughly then all of a sudden the narrative changed (I assume in preparation for this proxy war). Now ukraine is just known as the bastion of leftist liberalism in Eastern Europe.

Vice had a 111 episode docu-series on ukraine that ran from 2013 to 2016 that barely anyone even watched (most vids only had like 100k views tops). It's like the history of ukraine just got buried.

He isn't in a favorable position if all of NATO gets involved. His gambit was hoping NATO and the west in general would just let him take Ukraine.
His bluff was called, he can't just not invade so he's doing the slow walk hoping for a limited hangout that doesn't involve him happens first.
We'll see where the chips fall.

>why is he cucking out to the west?
The only part of his military that the West needs to give a fuck about is the nukes and maybe the submarines, maybe. Russia has demonstrated as much in Ukraine.

IMPORTANT PLEASE JOIN, HELP US COLLATING FUNDS, SAVE EVERYONE, SAVE THE MATRIX

t.me/zsafeheaven

the battle is not over yet, we need to stop world hunger, child labor, child trafficking, child pron, wage slavery, sleeplessness, et. al

this is just the intro, it will get way worse without your help

destroy all forms of worship or religion start with the star of david, talmud, bohemian grove, golden bull, banks, big tech, et al.

Reference:
archive.wakarimasen.moe/pol/thread/368726810/#368748335

Attached: weak black rage only.jpg (300x168, 14.36K)

Article 5.
Seriously, I am more concerned about Poles going berserk.

Russia had around 150-250k troops estimated at the border. They haven't even deployed half that.
The 1st cechen war lasted 2 years before they just decided to carpet bomb the country and kill everything. Russia still has a long ways to go in ukraine. It hasn't even been a month yet.

Good.

Let canadians seethe about it.
Btw I do the same thing when I'm dragged to see capeshit with some meatsack. Except I sleep throughout the entire movie.

I once fell asleep so hard during batman I drooled on my self and everyone saw it as they walked out.
Some rando woke me up and I think I had eye crust built up.
I'm rooting for russia all the way.

i am too. i think its likely they want to start war with russia just to finish them once and for all. i think maybe they think they are safe from nukes because russia wouldnt nuke a country that close to its own borders

>150-250k troops
Who don't want to be there. Ukraine has demonstrated that Russia has been cutting corners everywhere, has shit leadership and can't handle logistics.

This being said, the loses of lives on the Russian side are staggering.
I am hearing numbers like 7000/10000 KIA.
Last time I checked; they moved out of Afghanistan after 15K deaths.
This war is brutal. Don't know how it will ends.

Or targetting Belarus instead of Russia.
Could be instructive; Do Putin gives a fuck about his BFF Lukashenko?

That has been the same situation in all their wars. They always have high casualties and low morale.

In grozny they completely flattened the city though. Only ~40% of residences could be rebuilt. But barely anything was left intact. Russia had pretty crazy high casualties there too.

Lauren southern looks like that now?

Imagine all of North America, including you, invading Maryland and then losing in a war of attrition.
Thats the scale we're looking at here. For a "super power" its downright embarrassing.

ANSWER:
Because Putin is systematically ridding Ukraine of "Ukraine Independentists". Putin is 'leaving the back door open', and driving out the roaches infesting Russian land. Once Mariupol is liberated, then much resources will be available to take Kirkov, and close the Lysichansky pocket. THEN....when the ships arrive, the naval pincer around Odessa will signal the FINAL PINCER closing off Kiev.

By that moment.....Zelensky will have fled already. Then comes the referendums and cheering Ukrainians celebrating their liberation.

They typically had 10-15% casualty rates in cechya. But inevitably they just resort to complete destruction of the cities.
They're doing the exact same strategy in ukraine. They may not win though. Times are different and ukraine is getting a lot of funding and weapons. But a long protracted war with high casualties is typical for Russia.

>If

They know they can't do that in the modern age. War has changed. If you are conduction classic style military movements your advanced 4th gen warfare models have already failed and you are regressing backwards.