He was the last hope for "intellectually respectable" antisemitism...

he was the last hope for "intellectually respectable" antisemitism, the only chance that DA JOOOS could ever be anything more than fat low iq schizos in basements sieg heiling at nazi flags. but he was destroyed by the cofnas critique.

Attached: Kevin-MacDonald-1280x720.jpg (1280x720, 119.61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942340/
unz.com/article/reply-to-nathan-cofnas/
unz.com/article/my-paper-on-jewish-influence-blows-up/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Cicero
>Tacitus
>Voltaire
>Wagner
>Dostoyevsky
>Eliot
>Celine
>Pound
All great thinkers hate Jews.

Where's the critique?

ive met met him
culture of critique is in the top 10 of things you have to read to truly understand how poisonous the jew is

yea no, shut the fuck up kike

it was destroyed by cofnas. it uses dishonest citations and baseless arguments to inaccurately present many of its subjects. such as refraining from including marcuses criticism of israel, or even completely fabricating a quote of marx. the default hypothesis that jews are overrepresented in all political/cultural movements that aren't explicitly anti-semitic due to avg intelligence and urban settlement is far simpler than macdonalds and even included in macdonalds own thought. macdonald doesn't deny jewish overrepresentation in say chess or physics and explains it with intelligence, but jews aren't any more overrepresented in leftist political movements. and then macdonald also ignores any jewish involvement in non-leftist movements, such as american renaissance.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942340/
the tldr is that macdonald uses shoddy scholarship to give a completely biased view and that the default hypothesis to explain jewish overrepresentation is simpler and by occam much more likely.
seethe subhuman schizo.

Attached: nazi_germ.jpg (601x622, 45.3K)

lot of words and jew copes for a shit thread that will soon die

the point is that jews have played both sides
it almost goes without saying, but im pretty sure he addresses it directly

jews should have stayed banned from the kingdom of norway

>the tldr is that macdonald uses shoddy scholarship to give a completely biased view and that the default hypothesis to explain jewish overrepresentation is simpler and by occam much more likely.
sorry sweaty but that's debunked

unz.com/article/reply-to-nathan-cofnas/

DEBUNKED

unz.com/article/my-paper-on-jewish-influence-blows-up/

>Solzhenitsyn
>D.H. Lawrence
>Henrik Ibsen
>Machiavelli
>Milton
>John Donne

based, exactly. name virtually ever important thinker pre-1950 and guaranteed they were anti-semitic to some degree.

don't need words when you can heil and scream DA JOOOOOOOOS.
that's not the point retard.
>20k words
can you reproduce any of that in your own words? otherwise it's just argumentum verbosum. I read some of his responses, none of them were convincing.
in what ways were ibsen and machiavelli anti-semites?

Attached: nazitard_most_genius.png (789x766, 994.33K)

>can you reproduce any of that in your own words? otherwise it's just argumentum verbosum. I read some of his responses, none of them were convincing.
it is literally macdonald himself debunking the response to his work
good job showing that you're a pathetic shill

Is that anthony bourdain?

Cofnas critique was a bizarre strawman of an argument Mcdonald didn't even make

so (You) don't understand it, haven't even read it and simply take it on good faith that because he wrote 20k words it automatically refutes the criticism? I think you're too much of stupid subhuman to even be able to read any of these articles.

Attached: nazitard.jpg (1600x1200, 253.28K)

so basically you can't refute macdonald, and therefore to cope, instead of accepting reality you post the following drivel:

>so (You) don't understand it, haven't even read it and simply take it on good faith that because he wrote 20k words it automatically refutes the criticism? I think you're too much of stupid subhuman to even be able to read any of these articles.

macdonald has been refuted. his scholarship is dishonest and the default hypothesis is a superior explanation.

that's exactly what someone would say that can't refute:

unz.com/article/my-paper-on-jewish-influence-blows-up/

unz.com/article/reply-to-nathan-cofnas/

pathetic

>keeps spamming the same links to 20k words
I bet you're such a subhuman you have a hard time reading anything more complex than a smoloko meme.

Attached: nazi_larpers.jpg (1280x720, 784.85K)

i'll stop posting them when you refute them, incel

unz.com/article/my-paper-on-jewish-influence-blows-up/

unz.com/article/reply-to-nathan-cofnas/

>if white people are in a high position it's not because of their iq and capability
>you need to be very high iq to be in media
dishonest rat

>but he was destroyed by the cofnas critique
lol no
Cofnas rambling were absolute unfounded shit
They just needed something formal in writing so they could point and say "look it's been officially debooooonked"
You clearly haven't read it or you're lying through your teeth