>The website of the major pro-Kremlin Russian tabloid "Komsomolskaya Pravda" published information from the Russian Ministry of Defense, which states that:
>>- 9.8k Russian soldiers died in Ukraine
>>- 16.1k injured
>Now *poof* story has disappeared.
Long story short, I managed to make a copy in WebArchive before they changed the text on the site:
>According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, during the special operation in Ukraine, the Russian Armed Forces lost 9861 people killed, 16153 people were injured.
>Earlier it was reported that during a special operation in Ukraine, the captain of the 1st rank of the deputy commander of the Black Sea Fleet Andrei Paly was killed.
Here's the link: archive(dot)ph
The original text is in Russian, so use Google Translate.
9.8K RUSSIAN SOLDIERS DEAD
Other urls found in this thread:
web.archive.org
vesti.ru
twitter.com
Stories that are inaccurate disappear, sorry Hanz.
>using google translate
Kek
The site was hacked so can we stop making threads about it ?
Send in the next wave.
>Stories that are inaccurate disappear, sorry Hanz
A usual practice would be to include an 'UPDATE' or 'EDIT' , explaining things and random cuts.
>>using google translate
>Kek
Well, I know Russian and don't need it. Some people do, however.
>The site was hacked so can we stop making threads about it ?
So what is the latest update on Russian casualties?
The last time their DoD made a statement on this matter on March 2nd, I believe.
Then it was smth like 500 dead.
Any official unhacked updates since then?
>Bloomberg makes a fake article just before the trade closes claiming that Russia invaded Ukraine
>"oopsie, that was our mistake, despite it being online for 30 mins!"
"shit happens"
then
>Russian tabloid basically repeats Ukrainian propaganda about Russian casualties (10k vs 12k makes no difference)
>claims that the source is Russian MoD but you can't find MoD saying it anywhere
>chances the page (or the archive website is part of infowar / got hacked)
"that must be true"
fuck off, shill
Russia didn’t make any statements i thinks
And about that copy in way back machine
Any person with decent knowing of russian language will spot a mistaken
They wrote мaштaбных instead of мacштaбных
Fake and gay
do they even include the paid mercenaries in these numbers?
>They wrote мaштaбных instead of мacштaбных
I also noticed that, but it's quite a common mistake, often made even by native speakers.
>Russia didn’t make any statements i thinks
Which is KINDA weird, but also in line with all their coverage from there (they only show the Dumbass region' destructions, casualties etc., and omit actual war footage).
The information is fake
Back to uncertainty in guess
Their DoD have made no further statements on casualties.
are shills THIS desperate? jeez... they're gonna run with this one for weeks
The thing that gave it away that changes appeared at 21 not 20 when the article appeared and all “saved proofs” dated also 21 but no 20 strange doesn’t?
>Their DoD have made no further statements on casualties.
Their DoD is an absolute bullshit info source desu, they provide nothing of important updating.
Yeah they not gonna shut up about it
>all “saved proofs” dated also 21 but no 20 strange doesn’t?
Eh, sorry but that's not true.
>Their DoD is an absolute bullshit info source
>information from the Russian Ministry of Defense
dumb shill BTFOs his own fake info
Did you looked at article?
Post the screenshot of it