Dispelling the 2 days war narrative

In the 3 months of Russia’s final steps of military buildup on Ukraine’s borders, BEFORE the war began, the following observations were made:
>Russian parliament ratified a law that simplified the mass-burial of thousands of soldiers
>Russian parliament ratified a law to simplify massive refugee influx
>Russian military was spotted moving large amounts of blood supplies to the border
>Russian military was spotted moving crematoriums to the border
>Army contractors that were being assembled all across Russia were told that their “business trip” will last anywhere between 3 to 9 months

The “quick victory” narrative was entirely the brainchild of Twitter and western “analysts”
Actions by the Russian parliament and military command suggested a very different picture

Attached: 3AF85669-134D-43CB-906E-2AEC24E92D2F.jpg (1080x602, 156.5K)

>US SOURCES CLAIM

Attached: 1647675583866.png (600x562, 128.46K)

Bump

World is populated by ADHD zoomers and for them things need to happen fast.

Thats why they all get into debt too or why they cant plan ahead.

Attached: 1647805141952.jpg (878x653, 159.16K)

Attached: 1647372328908.jpg (839x1024, 91.89K)

Attached: 1646493717743.jpg (500x650, 67.43K)

Attached: 1647720818969.jpg (581x845, 86.61K)

not buying it.
->hope for the best
->but prepare for the worst

also why the fuck did he hold 2/3 of his army back until the second week of the conflict?
why werent the chechens and more importantly syrians ready from the get go?

looks like a fuckup to me.
dont get me wrong, im not a nato-whore
but this genuinely looks like a fuckup

>ummm we actually planned to fuck it up and send the country into the middle ages, sweaty. deboonked.

if it could be done in three days, it could be done in 30 minutes. since it could be done in 30 minutes, you have to try. there's no reason not to have multiple plans. it is hard to accept western OSINT analysis at face value when it is mostly presented without evidence.

>send more Redditors

Attached: 1647890046022.jpg (853x468, 37.13K)

its not a fuck up. pretty solid prophets like Irlmaier have foreseen a russian attack on western europe in a year that fits this year (mild winter, economic crysis).
so my take is that the slow advance is fake to make the west feel safe.
>if russia takes 2 months for a waek country, nato states are safe hurr durr
russia is absolutely mighty. i wouldnt be surprised for this slow advance to be strategic

There was a lot of evidence russia was preparing for a bloodbath. Including using psychological tactics against their own troops to desensitise them several weeks before the war. Clearly you don’t do all these things if your plan is to waltz in uncontested or with minimal losses

Attached: 1647890137628.png (566x325, 46.45K)

yeah, doesnt convince me.
especially when your chief argument is "some nigger seen it in a dream"

yea but his dreams became true in the past. still no proof of course.

yea but his dreams became true in the past.
>still no proof of course.

thing is i may or may not have experience with strange stuff
and i know things are far from being set in stone...
but for that, its me who "has seen it in a dream"

Wow CIA Niggers Bellingcat really knocked it out of the park with that one.

just google irlmaier if you could maybe believe this to be true. hes a much cited person.

bingo. The west created their own fantasy world so they could control the narrative.

It's what my government does with every fucking aspect of our society. The people who buying into the bullshit are usually liberals.

i dont say he's illegitimate
im saying nothing is set in stone.
lets leave it at that
not in the mood for /x/-posting