The amount of losses the Russians are taking is insanely high for modern warfare. Wtf is wrong with Russian tactics that they lose over 10k troops in less than a month? Could never be the US.
Russian Losses
Grayson James
Mason Peterson
citation needed
Aiden Bailey
>Source: shitbong propaganda
Angel Reed
Nothing if they achieve their objectives.
Lincoln Reed
>Wtf is wrong with Russian tactics that they lose over 10k troops in less than a month?
Is there any proof of this?
Josiah Cruz
There is no war. Your media is trying to convince you to start one. Watch the news and smell the desperation from corrupt pieces of shit
Gabriel Ward
defendig is always easier than attacking, nothing about the war seems out of the ordinary in this regard.
just because you're used to seeing the us fighting sand people, doent mean that real wars are fought like that.
Camden King
The US never participated in a peer-to-peer war. The Russia/Ukraine conflict is a first of its kind in modern history. The militaries are similar with the exception that Russia just has more toys and more experience.
Ok pretty sure if the US would invade Ukraine, and if it wouldn’t go for “disregard civilians” bombing tactics, US losses could be comparable
Oliver Bennett
whats the official Kremlin death number?
Brandon Ortiz
The objectives are constantly changing because of how badly they’re getting BTFO’d of by pissed off xoxols
Landon Martinez
You're assuming the Kremlin cares about human life.
Jonathan Smith
T. Im retard
Nathan Davis
>Could never be the US.
Their friendly fire rate is way too low to be compared to the US
Jack Perry
that right, all russian regulars are expendable because he can always call on reserves to defend russia
Jason Wright
There are many coroborating reports
Jason Adams
I think 500 was the last number.
It's probably around 1500-2000 or so. Nowhere near what the US or UKR is claiming. The US gets it's guesstimates by seeing an abandoned or blown up piece of armor and going by the capacity it could hold.
Bentley Nelson
10,000 rockets maybe.
Samuel Gonzalez
Ukraine is not a Russian peer
Gabriel Baker
Russia didnt lose 19 or 14k, they lost about 3k soldiers so far, but that's still a really high number. Idk if its the weapons thatt Ukies got from the west or they're dug in really well, but either way, they are taking heavy casualties. My guess is that's why all those generals keep getting shot by snipers on the frontline.
Jonathan Lopez
Oliver Turner
Idk, gee maybe its not so easy to fight in places where civilians & enemies mixed in one place.
While enemy shoots at you.
Nolan King
prove to me they lost 10k troops.
Jacob Turner
Russia forgot they're not soviet union anymore. Their (non Muslim) demographics are already on the decline. A couple more years until Russian khaliphate I guess.
Juan Robinson
The only reports that report shit like this are CIA/Ukraine. They are completely worthless to measure this conflict.
Michael Johnson
>Could never be the US.
Yeah because the US bombs everything in sight with no thought about civilian causalities.
Adrian Gray
By type of weapons used it is a peer
Hudson Phillips
>but that's still a really high number.
Not really. The Russians don't use meat shields like the US does when they invade.
>How many US soldiers did you lose?
>40
>How many Afghans that were helping you?
>Uh....
James Bennett
Theres nothing wrong with the Russian tactics. They are just fighting National Socialists.
Ian Parker
They have not, nor can they achieve their original objectives.
A high-ranking, senior United States general has stated; Russia cannot take any major city such as:
Kyiv
Kharkiv
Odessa
Dnipro
Donetsk
Zaporizhzhya
Lviv
Kryvyi Rih
Mykolaiv
Mariupol
The only city on this list that is up for debate is Mariupol.
Russia can now only do a stalemate, which will eventually end in a withdrawal.
Russia is just prolonging needless bloodshed at this point.
Brandon Hall
Jesus Christ Americans are fucking retarded
Noah Sullivan
>There are many coroborating reports
I’ve seen the opposite, that Ukraine is is taking heavy losses. You are saying it’s actually Russia?
Brandon Ross
Kino. I am 100% rooting for Ukraine!
Liam Turner
>A high-ranking, senior United States general has stated
>the opinion of a US official
>lost every war since ww2 where they had to use nukes
Yeah, no.
Isaiah Price
Lmao glow
Chase Stewart
russian mother's association also said 2000
Benjamin Richardson
That's why we only invade countries with civilian populations worth losing. You gonna start crying about dead Arabs that, even when forced upon them, violently reject democracy and the latest Marvel superhero movies?
Brody Jones
>senior United States general has stated
I’m gonna need to ask the 50 experts that said Hunters Laptop was Russian disinformation if they agree
Jayden Morris
This post is proof that no one knows what’s what and who’s who?
Most can’t tell Ruskies from Ukrainian.
For all We, know these soldiers are Ukrainian.
Bentley James
When you max out aesthetic...
Zachary Sanders
Got citations pal?
Landon Moore
>The amount of losses the Russians are taking is insanely high for modern warfare. Wtf is wrong with Russian tactics that they lose over 10k troops in less than a month? Could never be the US.
Understand this, burger. THEY DON'T CARE...as long as their objectives are met, then they don't care about losses.
Just check out the russian/soviet losses of WW2....that out to give you some indication to what their MO is when conducting war.
Sure, they might have adapted to a more 'american' style of fighting by trying to mitigate some of their losses, but their main MO is the same. Press on until victory is achieved.
And russians back at home understand this. They won't start rioting and demanding the heads of their government when bags of their sons come home.
This is what most americans don't and can't understand.
It's a shitty line from a shitty movie, but remember the phrase from Transformers The Last Knight: no sacrifice, no victory.
The russians understand it better than most americans.