How did Christianity survive for so long being a passivist religion...

christianity isn't pacifist, you pedo

Attached: 1604553207569.jpg (960x896, 107.85K)

Muslims only won because of jews. Jews started a war between Rome and Persia which were the two super powers of the era (literally jews invited Persians to take Jerusalem and paid the Persians to be able to personally torture Christians after the city was captured, then they enslaved those Christians and took the true cross of Christ as loot back to Ctesiphon; the theft of the most important relic in Rome led to the war). This war was close fought and bankrupted and decimated both sides, with Rome coming out as technical victor. 2 years later the Arabs come out of their desert to find rich lands defended by nothing but old men and boys. This is how they got their foothold.

Jews then orchestrated a systematic takedown of Spain. They got into political positions and had a bunch of fortresses and castles destroyed. After they lost these defensive positions due to political bs, the jews invited the moors to come. The jews famously opened gates, provided arms and information, fought for the muslims and would garrison the conquered towns allowing the moorish force to continue to march at full strength. The Christians believed muslims to be a jewish sect at this early point, as they were allies everywhere.

And that is how the filth got into the lands of the Romans, Visigoths and Persians. It really is ALWAYS the jews.

European kings didn't want to become conquered. What a retarded question.
Buddhism and Jainism are pascifist too and they switched up the rules the second the enemy knocked on the door.

Imagine abandoning your close ancestor's religion for a 1000 year old dead larp recorded by the same christians you criticize

Aren't japs supposed to be intelligent?

So you are saying white christians defended Europe against muslim invaders?

Not to mention, Byzantium stood in the way of arab invasions for a 1000 years, Byzantium being a Christian kingdom / empire.

It does not get stated enough that jews and muslims were once on the same team, especially during the Crusades.

Europe was obliterated after the 2001 ritual through fake rapefugees, nobody could win against us before so they had to use those tricks. We will win again bro

Attached: cavalieretemplareegesù2.jpg (720x960, 106.51K)

>support zog because it's your government
>larp as jewish because your ancestors were forced to support judaism
My closest ancestors were NatSocs who fought back against both.

The Roman Catholic Church
and the Filioque (vid-related).
youtube.com/watch?v=_Rrzo55G364&t=208sAVVRP

Attached: Latin-Patriarchate-of-Jerusalem.png (1236x815, 244K)

Read Hitler's speeches (not the bullshit "Table Talks" made after his death). He was fervently pro Christianity.

also,
I think you don't understand what Pacifism is or what real Christianity is (read: Catholicism).

And reminder that Hitler would have probably dominated global politics for the rest of his life if he hadn't invaded Russia.

No he wasn't. Himmler had free reign in how to bring up the future NatSoc elite and it wasn't as cuckstians.
There is a reason no major christian denomination ever produced anything akin to National Socialism. Grow up.

Byzantium submitted to islam. Christianity provided zero strength to europeans.

Its true. This is why marranos and conversos and witches were hated throughout Christendom, these changelings could never be trusted, these jews who claimed to be kin and were nice to your face were the same who would stab you in the back, poison your food and drink, and aid foreign armies. We learned to distrust the hooked noses and you can see this in European stories with traitors or vile characters like goblins in them always being based on jewish physiology.

When Crusades were called they generally had a precursor phase where the good Christians purged the jews in their own country before setting out to slay their semitic brethren further afield. There are some amusing stories of the Norman king getting mad at the English for slaughtering his yiddish pets, but they all escaped to Scotland and not one was punished; God be praised.

>being a passivist religion?

Attached: machiavelli_christianity.jpg (802x500, 65.17K)

In normie history they had great success in MENA because the Christians there had been fighting each other over sectarian differences and saw the Muslims as better than the Byzantines. When they reached the recently converted areas in Europe the sperging about how many angels can fit on the head of pin wasn't going on yet.

I think when they faced tribes rather than cities the tribes understood the ooga booga gibsmedat style of warfare the Arabs practiced. This is also why the tribal Berbers, Turks, and Franks put up the toughest fights against them while urbanized people just let them do whatever because "not my problem." The other element is jewish xenophilia which led them to think the Arabs were better masters than the Christians and they spied for them and did garrison duty for them in at least Spain as far as I know. On the other hand this lic is a Jewess that put up a better fight than a lot of Christian city slickers did.

Attached: al-kahina.jpg (562x1024, 89.29K)

Crusades were more often against European white christians than arab muzzies and never against jews.

They never encountered a completely exterminary force like the Cartheginians when they faced Rome. By then, the Romans lacked the pure hate and vitriol, and even then tales are told of their cruelty.

Byzantium submitted to Islam because the populations there had become Schismatic as
youtube.com/watch?v=_Rrzo55G364
shows.
Wherever you had Roman Catholicism, the Mohammedan threat was taken seriously and treated with the gravity it deserved.

>passivist religion
it isn't

He makes us stronger. Not the world easier

How did you survive this long being a passivist IQ?