So let me get this straight

So let me get this straight
Ukraine has
>Numerical superiority
>Defending is easier than attacking
>High Morale due to fighting on home turf against an aggressor
>Technical superiority, west is supplying them with state of the art weaponry that Russia doesnt have any counters to
>The entire political and economic power of the western world behind them, who are financing them, supplying them and keeping them fed
>no sanctions unlike Russia


so how come they are still losing?

Attached: forces.png (483x186, 29.44K)

They're cowards

>this is your brain on hoi4

>so how come they are still losing?

All of their airfields and anti air positions were destroyed on the very first day. Russians have a missile and air superiority and all they have to do is call in targets, but the problem is they are surrounded by meat shield and they can't just destroy everything like they did in Chechnya because they're the same blood. This is basically a hostage crisis

They're also losing to Russian troops purposely using older equipment while Ukies are fucking using NATO supplied modern weapons

Most technological things Ukraine has is only Javelins

They're winning Chud, Twitter says so

The war is the fakest and gayest thing since covid, like drop a nuke or a nerve agent or shut the fuck up.

>waaaaa real wars aren't michael bay movies
Kys

They don't want to be there. While ukrainians are fully motivated to defend their country.

checked but I don't watch movies and had to search who he was so you kys.

>so how come they are still losing?
They aren't.
Have you seen the recent news from CNN, BBC, twitter, reddit and 9gag? Russia is loosing heavily, gonna capitulate tomorrow or next week. user from /uhg/ told me

>still losing?

>implying
It's a stalemate and will probably be for month, hence why Russia is trying to mobilize more and more people and involve Belarus army into the fight
Killing 6 civvies in Kiev doesn't mean Ukraine is "losing"

Attached: 1646083219998.jpg (596x648, 235.15K)

We’ll see

what he said people keep claiming that the war is going wrong for Russia because they still haven't won, but there's no real reason for Russia to blitzkrieg them and risk all those losses when they can also just mortar the fuck out of them and slowly starve them

>no real reason for Russia to blitzkrieg

They already tried that
Didn't work out for them

Attached: 1645899365117.jpg (1594x858, 137.59K)

>>Numerical superiority
Doesn't matter
>>Defending is easier than attacking
Defending against Russia isn't easy
>>High Morale due to fighting on home turf against an aggressor
Who cares
>>Technical superiority, west is supplying them with state of the art weaponry that Russia doesnt have any counters to
Kek
>>The entire political and economic power of the western world behind them, who are financing them, supplying them and keeping them fed
Sure, it would be inconvenient for Russia, but Russia isn't depending on the West.
>>no sanctions unlike Russia
Nothing's left in Ukraine lol

>so how come they are still losing?
Russia controls everything, air, and navy; the only thing that's left is the ground, and we all know that Russia has got way more tanks and other land forces than any other country. Russia's been preparing for a while, way before the invasion actually happened.

>BeLIEving kikepedia
NGMI

>so how come they are still losing?
You forgot a party

Attached: 1647806030536.png (416x1024, 392.27K)

>so how come they are still losing?

ukraine is a jewish vassal state for laundering oilpipe money.

while whites/jews want to keep ukrain under jewish rule, putin isnt so keen on that

actually the Russians have technical superiority (or so everyone thought). At least on paper Russian equipment (especially tanks [which should outperform even the most modern NATO tank on paper] and fighters) should be better than what Ukraine has. Also NATO isn't supplying their newest equipment to Ukraine, but older ones which the Russians have technical knowledge of anyway.
Putin spend a lot of money modernising the Russian armed forces and is sending his best equipment. He even had the chance to test it in Syria. That's also the reason why Russia is winning. Although NATO strategists believe that Russia should be able advancing faster with their equipment.
There has been supply problems and Ukraine has been surprisingly successfully in their raiding tactics (which Russians learned to somewhat counter by now), but that still doesn't explain all the delay.
That beeing said Russia is winning for now (all Ukrainian Counter-attacks failed thus far, which was costly for them)