Hitler’s art work that “has no artistic value”

This is extremely impressive talent

Attached: D62B5BDB-A9A4-4A52-9CC2-083499296429.jpg (400x291, 41.39K)

Looks terrible. Simply copying reality isn't art

Take your meme flag off you faggots.

Attached: Screenshot_20220321-032559.png (1440x3120, 1.12M)

for his era it really wasn't; check out the more famous pantings of that period

His perspectives were shit

But none of those were created by such a pained and sympathetic artist

You like modern art huh?

Attached: Ed-Buck-meth-576x1024-338x600.jpg (338x600, 36.04K)

CIA backed abstract expressionism is art instead

Soviet russia is at the origin of degenerate art thanks to their (((bolshevik))) artists.

Attached: Komposition-II.jpg (536x600, 68.89K)

the shadows are wrong

Simply coping with your lack of talent isn't art either.

Any Forums is neither mature nor intelligent enough to have a conversation about "Art" (besides it's instrumentality in money laundering). Suffice it to say that Hitler made more of "Illustrations" than art, and he conveyed no emergent message within his work.

Attached: 1646417250807.jpg (1000x1003, 235.1K)

This is literally what some guy drew in his spare time, his work is valued at 900 million

Attached: 69C703FB-2238-4673-89B0-0790C32FCCED.jpg (527x800, 54.8K)

it really says nothing artistically

Hitler’s work was more impressive

Attached: 96E92C03-C27A-4039-BDBC-8EEABB1737AC.jpg (848x565, 115.18K)

Its book illustrator-level stuff. It's pretty good for someone trying to get into art school. But it doesnt have genius in it.

Composition is so painfully difficult, especially original one

The art of Lincoln literally shits on that cuck hitler’s garbage

Can't let the goyim know about old world buildings

Attached: 1640142414297.jpg (1000x625, 301.09K)

lol what an autistic piece of shit

The light is coming in at least three different angles. Hitler did indeed lack perspective.

with a lot of generosity you can say Kandinsky is a little bit interesting. But he is one of the very very few if not the only one who made modern art that you can find something in. It's still bad art desu but most other modern art is utter shit.

Are you kidding? Its not mind blowingly good but its pretty good draftsmanship. His people - in the foreground are shit and that kind of ruins it because he's trying to inspire - man in the shadow of artistic and architectural genius and it ruined it a bit but "terrible" - "no artistic value? I dont think so.

>no artistic value
He was told to be a draftsman or something because they wanted painters. His art career was not such a exciting story iirc.

Attached: 1646350401756.png (181x200, 36.08K)