You know what's crazy is I speak to anons on here and they're like literal 70 year old boomers and they think that...

You know what's crazy is I speak to anons on here and they're like literal 70 year old boomers and they think that communism is when only a few people have all of the money, or something. And no matter what information or facts you present to them they still won't let this go. And they honestly believe this.

Attached: pepe.jpg (976x850, 57.91K)

Sage

Bump

They have seen communism in action. The ruling class granted themselves a far better standard of living than the masses got.

Attached: Commie Dog.jpg (1000x1000, 116.51K)

40iq take: Communism is when a few people have all the money

100iq midwit take: Communism is when workers own the means of production and there is no money or state and there is economic equality as a result of that. Says so right here in this book communists wrote.

140iq take: An economy without money and private ownership lacks a profit motive, which means that industries must be centrally coordinated by a few individuals who will decide on quotas and the consequences for underperformance. These economic planners will inevitablty "plan" for material wealth to accrue to them. They will of course not publicly claim to own all that stuff , but they wil enjoy exclusive access to the nice offices, country houses, chaufeured cars, personal assistants and cooks no different from ownership. Because they will in effect own the country. And because they need to maintain the fascade of 'no money, no posessions', they will need to brutally supress anyone trying to get ahead, soon taking on the character of a military dictatorship.

Find me a communist country that isn't a totalitarian corrupt shit hole.

No they haven't seen communism in action actually and that's not what happened under communism historically. Historically there has been no significant wealth inequality under communism at all because the core point of communism is erasing wealth inequality. And you're also a legitimate fucking boomer retard for doubling down on this stupidity.

Extremely sage worthy thread.
Give me an example of the information or facts you present to them to refute this.

There's no wealth inequality under communism. Communism is when you take all of the rich people's money and none of the shit you're saying is even remotely real.

I'm sure the leaders of the Soviet Union or Communist China live the same shit tier life as a rice farmer or factory worker.

Every communist society that ever existed.
According to who? The US state department and the CIA whose virulent anti-communist propaganda you have blindly digested and blindly repeated for your entire boomoid life?

So you can't find one...I wonder why that is....

There was zero meaningful wealth inequality in the Soviet Union and people led very good lives there. You're extremely brainwashed if you think people didn't lead good lives in the USSR.

>communism is when only a few people have all of the money, or something
Oddly that's how it's worked out every time

My family lived in the Soviet Union you fucking retarded zoomer piece of shit.

>I wonder why that is....
It's because the US state department and CIA have been brainwashing you since birth to oppose communism and they've done it with endless lies and misinformation about every communist society.

No they didn't. Every conservative on the internet claims their family lived in the Soviet Union and then makes up factually untrue stories about why it was awful. None of it is true.

Nope. Never. Never even once.

I oppose communism because of the shit my family went through under it. I didn't need muh CIA my own family experiences are enough to tell me communism is fucking retarded and anyone who wants to push that ideology should be shot in the fucking head.

money isn't a commodity u dumb fuck.

This entire "under communism a few people have all of the wealth" lie that you're all doubling down on is objectively false. Not debatable false. Not mostly false. Just 100% objectively documentably false.

>When a few people have all the money or something
Money is obviously equivalent to power and every communist society so far has either controlled all the money or controlled all the money until they made it effectively useless after consolidating all of the power under the party. So it sounds like you get BTFOd by boomers unless you have a better example.

Your family never went through anything under communism and nearly everyone from former communist societies, according to all of the polling done on the matter, say that life under the communist regimes were better.

I'm not a conservative. You are retarded tho.

You didn't study history, huh?
Also, SAGE!

>I speak to anons on here
No you don't glownigger. Go shill somewhere else

Attached: glowing_one.jpg (1280x720, 48.88K)

>t.

Attached: 4A1F6984-543D-47DC-976C-0FD69AF84528.jpg (720x872, 43.96K)

What does this mean? What were you trying to say? What idea were you trying to communicate?

you are a faggot

You're strawmanning. Anybody who claims that a few people have "all" of the money is using hyperbole to describe a situation in which the ruling party effectively has all of the money.

No. Nope. Private businesses with private property are unregulated and can do whatever they want. You're thinking of them. You're thinking of capitalism. Not communism. Communism is the opposite of that. No one has singular power under communism.

You're a bitch

You can deny it all you want I know the disgusting system of communism more then you ever will you zoomer faggot.

You are. Everyone on Any Forums is a conservative, regardless of what special political pronouns they like to ascribe to themselves ("nazi" or whatever).

The only one who's lying and false is you.
provide proof.

>No one has singular power under communism.

Attached: typical_leftism.jpg (630x840, 74.74K)