How come NATO article 5 wasn't initiated?

When Russia turned 43 turkroaches into kebab?

Attached: turk2.png (637x838, 840.08K)

Based kebab removers

because the Turks are aggressors
NATO is a defensive pact you swedishnigger

That's called an oopsy daisy

They deserved it for being roaches

Attached: 1646666386965.jpg (690x512, 68.35K)

qrd?

Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's)

Article 5 doesn't count when Turks are the invaders of another sovereign country.

1) Because it's a meme
2) Nobody wants to start WWIII from couple dozens of dead soldiers.

Because we shouldn't create world war 3 over a FUCKING BORDER DISPUTE
retards blew this way out of proportion. Could've ended a long time ago but for some reason retards think putin is on some quest for world domination when he has said time and time again that he just wants areas that are 99% Russian (Donetsk Luhansk) freed and for Ukraine to stop teasing nato partnership.

article 5 only applies to territory in europe. which is why the falklands or colonial wars didnt count

Aggressive war. It's why not everyone helped us in Iraq.

Article 5 is when you are attacked on your sovereign soil. Turks were in syria doing some spec ops shit

Nope, it was invoked for Afghanistan.

Imagine being a "soldier". Lol, fucking morons.

Is Syria in gay as fuck NATO?

turkroaches 2nd class citizens in NATO lol


god i wish russia starts ww3

roaches don't count

You've obviously never even tried to read it. Shill

Yet only a few bootlicking shitholes complied. The US just wanted to cut costs, they knew damn well Art 5 cannot apply but they have enough influence too get some cheap support

Yea that's true. It is kinda BS. Makes me wonder how often Turkey has tried to use article 5 against the Kurds.

>article 5 only applies to territory in europe. which is why the falklands or colonial wars didnt count
They counted in our hearts.

Because they were in Syria. Being in NATO does make you untouchable.