I am recently thinking about why JK rolling is anti-transgender

I am recently thinking about why JK rolling is anti-transgender,
when I was a child, the only idea after I read 《harry potter》 is that good people will always win, so just be good.

but now I have some more thoughts
because according to her standards of values shown in books, transgenders are some way just Death Eaters and Voldemort

> develope advanced evil magic technology
gender surgery and hormonotherapy

> don't accept your inherent and try to divide the soul with Horcrux
gender identity disorder, destroy the reproductive system (making a horcrux need to murder)

> thinks wizrds are being oppressed and want to declare war to the rest of the whole world
typical globalhomo

> force normal people to accept it and dont want any other voice
leftist

the goal of good people is simply creat a static and harmony world , no need for scary killing magic and advanced magic, just forever peacful life.

As for House-elf, Muggles , her solution is persuade them to accept theirselves. just like rolling support gay because gay dont need to change anything.
but there is a premise that elves willing to serve wizards, and muggles are as clever as them.

she designed a perfect eden that people there have no fundmental conflicts,
the only problem is those who want to break it.

but our world in reality is not eden, it is driven by tech-progress faster and faster till totaly lost control, she could see it collapsing in living years,

Attached: 2057715.jpg (1920x1080, 459.05K)

Rowling, sorry

It's an allegory for christ and the bible. Jesus christ how much time have toy wasted on this

just some personal feelings

Rowling made sure that in her books the reader knows which side is the good side and which side is the evil side.
I mean you can't get anymore evil than calling your villains "death eaters" and having your villain be literally a man who can't feel love.

These books are fine as a fiction fantasy read but they do not reflect our world very well at all.
People on this website honestly beleive in a lot of ideas the death eaters believe in HP. But they don't see themselves as evil.
I've always wondered what was going through Nazi Germanys head when they thought a black on red banner and skulls were a good selling point for your new fascist empire.

>anti-transgender
she's not, she said countless times that she supports them but that there should be boundaries like in gendered sports. Just like she never depicted the goblins as being obvious kikes -- the producers from the movies did.
Fuck you all for trying to suggest that this talentless oldhole is somewhat based. Simps

fuck da troons :)

Attached: 1636177649366-1.jpg (4096x2526, 1.73M)

>Rowling made sure that in her books the reader knows which side is the good side and which side is the evil side.
Absolute BS. A shitton of characters like young malfoy and snape and even the big baddie of them all -- voldemort -- were depicted as a tragic figures, with most even finding redemption. Voldemort for instance was a victim of his surroundings, growing up in a dingy orphanage and being mistreated, etc.
And they called themselves Death Eaters because their goal was to control the power that death has over everyone -- including stopping it from happening.

He's the one
Who likes all our pretty songs
And he likes to sing along
And he likes to shoot his gun
But he knows not what it means
Knows not what it means
And I say he's the one - kirk

>I've always wondered what was going through Nazi Germanys head when they thought a black on red banner and skulls were a good selling point for your new fascist empire.
The colors employed werent new and are still a thing today eg albania's flag. and jewgle the totenkopf to read its origins and meaning