>I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones
Other urls found in this thread:
hou.usra.edu
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
It''s your fault for doing such a half assed job with the holocaust.
What weapons will WW5 be fought with
Einstein was a dumb, degenerate faggot. He stole most of the content of "his" theories from others. Essentially a media darling on par with Greta Thunberg. A dumb Jew with a tiny brachycephalic kike skull.
My money is on trained gorillas
Einstein thought that WW3 will send humanity back to the stone age. It won't though. Even if every nuke that exists were placed to detonate as strategically as possible to cause as much destruction as possible, they'd still cover less than 1% of the area that humans inhabit
Lazurs n sheeit
This is a really fucking stupid quote.
How can there be a WWIV if people only have sticks and stones. There can't be a global conflict with stone age tech.
Weaponized Spleens that you throw at each other and it makes them sick. Everybody already is equipped with one, but you aquire more by conquest.
That's a silly quote.
It should say "If world war 3 is fought with nukes, we will never get the chance to have a world war 4"
>some dumb plagiarizing kike said something
No one knows what they are hiding. Just because the US and USSR promised each other not to make more nukes, doesn't mean they kept their promises. Both parties were most likely thinking "Yeah yeah, I know they are going to continue making bigger and more potent nukes, so let's also continue". It's proforma to make shit calm down for a while.
Have in mind that in 1960, the USSR tested the Tsar bomba. The biggest one, 100kt, can literally destroy a major city like London, leaving few if any survivors. And mind you, that was in 1960, only around 15 years after the first nuke was created. It's 62 years ago since 1960. Over 4 times longer than the period between the first nuke and the Tsar bomba. The Russians have publicly said that they could make a 1mt nuke.. So imagine what they could make today? Not to mention what the US has in its arsenal.
Wouldn't surprise me that they have nukes or other types of advanced bombs that can flatten a fucking continent or split the planet in two.
Black powder shite, Obviously.
It's the next step in evolution after hand weapons
Chernobyl melting down in Ukraine caused radiation to be detected throughout Europe.
The fukushima reactor caused radiation to be detected in California!
If over 10,000 nukes are detonated globally, the entire planet will be caked in radiation.
Only the people who are safe from the radiation in underground bunkers, or who are genetically blessed to have a natural resistance, will survive the nuclear holocaust.
Mars was nuked in the past.
>hou.usra.edu
It's possible that jews themselves are reincarnated beings from Mars.
Only the unfortunate will survive. Not a world I'd wanna live in.
>The biggest one, 100kt
bro the hydrogen bomb is 50 megatons, which is 50,000 kilotons
I was actually in doubt, should have jewgled it. But then it's 100mt. The biggest Tsar bomba. And then 1gt tsar bombas they said they could produce.. In 1960, lmao. They probably have some highly advanced bombs that will make nukes and hydrogen bombs look ancient by now. Who knows what they've been up to.
mcluhansk?
Wtf
WW3 is in full swing.
The weapons are the narratives.
Whoever has the most effective narrative delivery system wins.
Bullets and bombs are just useful tools to create the narratives this time around.
BTW I think the bad guys may be winning because they are better at lying.
They aren’t better at lying, they’re better at saturation. They needed to aggressively dump people down and assassinate their consciousness for over 100 years before they could try their shitty plan and it still didn’t work. The parasite class might be intelligent, but they’re fucking retarded