Why does he still want a no-fly zone if Russia losing?
Why does he still want a no-fly zone if the negotiations are going well?
Why does he still want a no-fly zone if Russia losing?
Why does he still want a no-fly zone if the negotiations are going well?
Other urls found in this thread:
why do I want to coom after I already coomed?
> Wants to stop Russian bombardment.
> "ONLY LOSERS WANT LESS DEATHS!"
Mutts wouldn't get it.
From the author of
>They would not use propaganda if situation was hopeless!
New product:
>Why does he still want a to protect cities from cruise missiles and bombings if Russia losing?
Because he is a lying motherfucker and we are losing.
He loses nothing by asking for it and continuing to put pressure on NATO. It also makes the continued funneling of weapons and supplies to Ukraine appear to be less of an escalation. Typical politics. Also, there's no indication that the negotiations are going well other than the typical public well-wishing PR bullshit.
Why is a superpower like Russia struggling against a few gypsies led by a Jewish comedian? Shouldn’t they have won easily?
so he can roll into rostov and force putin to resign and be arrested and taken to brussels for trial
Because you are a coomer
he knows he won't get a no-fly zone, he just says it to look like he's doing his job/make poltards seethe/help his people cope with losses ("we're losing people because the West isn't helping enough")