IMPORTANT
NATO SHILLS BTFO
ok now that i got your attention i need help to confirm fake news is fake news
I saw some /k/ fags posting this vid
but unless im blind thats a ukrainian tank isnt it?
a T64
someone confirm please, the wheels is killing me here, t64 wheels have a gap between them and thats the only thing i cant see clearly
id still bet on ukrainian but i need confirmation
HAPPENING
Other urls found in this thread:
commons.wikimedia.org
twitter.com
Wonder how many lives that cat has left after escaping that
Was there a journalist inside
I literally parked the car because curiosity. I NEED to know.
Ive only managed to take a couple of decent screenshots.
Pic rel is one. It seems to cross a small bump thingie so the spacing may be just that? Those are however small and evenly places, which discards most tank models already
Did this site turn retarded or something? Am I being baited? That's a BMP-2
I don't see Z on it probably is Ukrop Nazi tank God I cant wait until Kiev falls and this shitshow finally ends. The idea of Ukranianism needs to die NOW Ukraine must be partitioned.
It looks like just another BMP-2? WTF is going on here why are people calling it a tank? It's clearly shooting an autocannon
>a T64
My dude, if you see a t64 there im afraid your BLIND AS FUCK
And yes, its common procedure for ukranian tank crews to blast their own countrys car if theyre black. Theyre just that racist those nazi fucks.
Really? Shit im retarded then.
Didnt know there were BMP2 in ukraine
But this makes it complicated I think both sides have these. No? Any distinguished marks?
dont bully i said im kinda blind
wasnt joking
im getting self conscious
i need to research more of this stuff
please like
ok delete thread
i jist wanna know
is it ukrainian?
an 'expert' in Soviet military equipment said the forces shooting teh car were from Donetsk. bet let's sherlock this.
>thats a ukrainian tank isnt it?
That's not a tank, more like a BMP-2. Could be Uki or Rus. Judging by the fact it is almost alone, I would say Uki. But either way, why is it shooting at a car?
>dont bully i said im kinda blind
Oh im sorry
>is it ukrainian?
Its not just you being blind, the image is granny and the angle isnt very good, we cant see any markings
I doubt it is ukranian because makes no sense for them to shoot random civilian cars in their own country, but no hard evidence of which side that BMP belongs.
This and checked
any armored thing with a larger than small arms canon is a "tank"
the distinguishment is meaningful only to war nerds
>Didnt know there were BMP2 in ukraine
commons.wikimedia.org
>no sense for them to shoot random civilian cars in their own count
Same for both sides so i cant think that an argument
Maybe the fact it got no division markings is a hint?
help
>Judging by the fact it is almost alone,
Its not, hes covering a column of vehicles behind him.
various weapons modules were developed for those tanks. autocannons are fairly normal because of that
el peruANO
Well II said almost alone. Unless there's another video, then we don't know much about what's behind him. I see what looks like one other vehicle behind the trees
im making a fool of myself
in my defense i researched this stugf for an hour only
and well
sorry
and thanks for the link
>a T64
Fuck no. It's a lightly armored vehicle with a small cannon.
No worries. If you don't ask, then you are a fool
Near war zones there arent supposed to be any civilians and nobody is gonan check. If there is an unmarked car it is assumed that they are either spies or intelligence service.
Foreign weapons are being transported with civilians cars. This is not a question whether they are real civilians or not but rather if there is an unmarked car its gonna get destroyed, this is war.
It's a bmp1 firing both its machinegun and main 76mm cannon with autoloader, 100%.
Could be anyone.
Certainly could be Russians.
But the only ones to fear civilian involvement are Ukrainians
does that hint at a Ukrainian vehicle then?
>Same for both sides so i cant think that an argument
It is because if it was russian it would make more sense to shoot a random car by mistake. Theyre invading they dont know what to expect. Maybe an anbush?
If it was ukranian why would he shoot a random car in his own country?
>Maybe the fact it got no division markings is a hint?
>help
It does have markings the image is just to blurry for me to indentify it. Its not hiding its marks
Its a bmp2, and in the video you can clearly see it followed by a btr 82 around 40 seconds. It's a russian warcrime Dumbass mountain nigger.
Around 30 sec in u can make out some white pixels on the side could very well be a Z but unsure
>But the only ones to fear civilian involvement are Ukrainians
Bullshit.
>why
the german made a point in that any civilian car in a warzone could be transporting guns or spying here so would mean Ukie
also just recently Ukrainians shot a reporter bc he was in an evacuated area taking pics from a car
A 76mm round does such pathatic damage against a car? The autoloader is that fast?
Good point
>Well II said almost alone. Unless there's another video, then we don't know much about what's behind him. I see what looks like one other vehicle behind the trees
We can see 6 or 7 trucks passing the road behind him. Hes covering that convoy. Its not one or two, watch the video again.