Why don't Ukraine just heckin' surrender?
Why don't Ukraine just heckin' surrender?
Brody Gomez
Other urls found in this thread:
burzum.org
twitter.com
Christopher Hughes
EVERY VATNIC IN THIS THREAD MUS POST HIS WRISTS.
IT'S FOR THE SCIENCE.
DO IT.
Easton Taylor
>i dont support russia by the way
Why they all always doing this? Feels kinda rude.
Michael Butler
Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's)
Jack Watson
russians never surrrender.
Hunter Russell
Because the Zelensky regime is a group of outsiders installed by foreigners, and they perceive the People of Ukraine as expendable.
Leo Lopez
Because they're winning
Levi Thompson
they don't want their women sodomized by 30 rooskies at a time. same as every war
Jacob Robinson
He was merely pretending to be gay
Ethan Powell
why didn't the nazis just surrender?
Eli Rodriguez
Is this the famous prison logic?
Michael Jones
They would have won with Steiner's counterattack
Charles Young
Supposed second world's strongest military is begging little Ukraine to surrender for three straight weeks lmao
Christopher Walker
>doing their very best to try and escalate this into WW3
Imagine unironically typing this out, and pressing post. Video games have truly rotted people's brains.
Jordan Gonzalez
It is all by design. Russia could swoop in and destroy the Ukes, but by drawing it out it "force" other nations to eventually get involved, which will trigger WW3. All of this shit is planned by the 1%.
Owen Myers
>doing their very best to try and escalate this into WW3
Shouldn’t you be rubbing your hands at the thought of this?
Liam Roberts
>no idea how Jewing works
Lurk moar, English teacher.
Jackson Miller
I'm 1.3% Jew according to my DNA test, so yes I know
Jason Scott
> attempts a military takeover of a foreign country
> "bro just surrender lmao"
Ivan you have more precious things to spend your shit currency on than VPN
Owen Parker
He has a point. Nobody wants a WW3. However the tendency on how far one side is willing to go, in terms of saving economic status for the risk of a global conflict. Is clearly visible. On the other hand you could argue, that the west has most to lose, so it makes sense.
Ryder Martin
because it's annoying, not because it's needed
Justin Lopez
>Nobody wants a WW3.
But user, I want a happening
Angel Watson
Seeing Varg defend the Russian invasion is amusing.
Guy's a retard.
Kevin Davis
>tries to take Ukraine in most peaceful way
>by starting a war
Jesus Christ this is your mind on propaganda
Christian Miller
Fiery but mostly peaceful invasion
Bentley Gomez
lel, I didn't even notice that's him.
Dominic Torres
Kek
Nathan Morgan
Zelensky isn't allowed to surrender by his masters, simple as.
Noah Bell
Here's an article where he explains his ideal society. It's kind of funny. You have to translate it bc it's in Norwegian
burzum.org
Luke Cooper
to avoid cancel culture
Gabriel Harris
Its a sensible disclaimer. There's all kinds of negative things to point out about Ukraine, NATO, the West, ect, but the invasion is still fundamentally indefensible.
David Roberts
>but the invasion is still fundamentally indefensible.
It's pretty defensible on principle, less defensible in the sense that they didnt push hard and fast enough, and telegraphed their intentions which has allowed the Ukrainians to establish a sort of hybrid insurgency that's bogged the Russians down due to their sometimes rules of engagement.
Daniel Evans
"ANUDDA 6 MILLION!!!!"
Adam Harris
I was referring to the invasion being ethically defensible.
Like, Russia's interests are clear, but "My neighbor is somebody else's puppet rather than mine" is generally not seen as a good enough excuse to start a war.
I don't totally believe the propaganda that the war is unpopular in Russia, but its not an implausible claim.