>ukraine is winn-
This is Mariupol before and after.
Ukraine is winn-
Who owns the buildings on the left?
formerly owned.
Germany did the same to leningrad. Did they win?
Don't worry, my country will surely pay to rebuild it
winning a war isn't a contest to see who can kill more civilians.
>comparing ukraine to germany in 41
oh wow even all the trees went away
AND A LIL' BIT OF CHICKEN FRIED
>russian narrative went from "there's no war" to "look at how we kill the civilians"
kek
Zozzled
lol, that's the literal definition of war. submit or die. oh wait, it's leaf
The Russian land forces have emphasis on large artillery barrages, that's why they've been getting people out of the cities so they can wipe them out and go in and clean up.
>But Russia is holding back and not targeting civilian buildings!!!! They're keeping the infrastructure for when they take over!!!
didn't take long for that to end up bullshit
are you a wizard?
COLD BORSCHT ON A FRIDAY NIGHT
Every day I hope that the neonazis in Mariupol survive this. A bunch of them are good white boys from the USA that decided to make themselves useful. Now they are in a battle to the death. I have no hope that the kike Zelenskyy will help them. The kikebitch Nuland wants them dead. Putin wants them dead.
If they survive it will be because the white man is an awesome fighting machine.
yeah, hey have a strange relationship with the truth.
putin thought he could capture kyiv in a few days and weeks later they still haven't succeeded. They might very well be on the verge of giving up and are now just trying to kill as many civilians as possible before pulling out as some bizarre consolation prize.
> They're keeping the infrastructure for when they take over!!!
They are, concentration camp prisoner.
Russia bombing out a few military targets in a city isn't anything close to the shock-and-awe carpet bombings that burgermutts inflict on their victims.
Spooky
All the residential houses are clearly smouldering ruins you leaf moron
>giving retards guns and rockets and letting them use civilian buildings to fight from
I wonder why Russia bombed these things
>putin thought he could capture kyiv in a few days and weeks later they still haven't succeeded
Prove it, dipshit.
No one in the world believes that besieging and capturing a city can be accomplished in a few days.
99% of sieges last for months and months.
Mariupol and Kharkiv are half-erased and Volnovakha literally doesn't exist as a city anymore
reuters.com
>inb4 fake news
Reuters is in partnership with TASS, which makes it state-approved media.
If they were privately owned, then there has been no transfer of ownership. Insurance should cover the damage. In the event they were Government owned, then they should be down the tubes.
I read someplace that the Ruskies were focusing in destroying government buildings, oligarch owned, Zalensky owned.
no you have to capture your military objectives before your run out of willing untrained conscripts to throw at the problem, kangoroo fucker.
HARD COCK ON A LONELY NIGHT
>Russia, wanting to annex, didn't completely flatten and obliterate like the Americans did
>that means Russia is losing because Russian are dying
note the lack of shelling in the low density residential district, with a focus only on the high rises that ukrops are using to mount their genocidal defense from.
prove it=RT or sputnik news, sorry lad can't help you there.
If your enemys die then you win.
>picture taken in the summer
>picture taken in the winter
>look at all the difference