Why isn't western media talking about this? Isn't it ironic to compare Putin to Hitler when the other side is literally colluding with nazies?
Literal neo-nazi paramilitary battalion is fighting for Ukraine at Mariupol
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
thehill.com
en.wikipedia.org
adl.org
twitter.com
azov is only 20% nazi
Remember the "moderate rebels" in Syria that the West trained and armed?
They are doing the same with "moderate Nazis" in Ukraine now.
If you ask me, the end does not justify the means. Providing assistance to literal neo-Nazis is immoral.
we nazis are winning the culture war
If by literal neo-nazis, you mean shabbos goys, then yes neo-nazis are fighting for Ukraine.
nazis aren't worst than communist russia
>azov battalion
>subhuman gopniks
Easy pick desu
because western libshits are coping in all sort of ways that the only noticeable resistance against russia comes from nazis.
see:
this guy is even generous with his percentages
I think it's probably because they didn't start a war, my dude. I don't think their personal beliefs are newsworthy
this.
>Providing assistance to literal neo-Nazis is immoral
You are going to hate WW3
>accuse everybody you don't like of being nazis
>get nazis deplatformed
>punch nazis
>seethe about nazis all day
>oh these nazis? no they're great, don lemon and zucc said it was okay to like them
You are beyond contempt
Are they actually nazi, because in the Netherlands they will say the same thing about nationalist organisations using runes and most of them are not nazi's.
Why does Ukraine keep these people on their payroll? Seems like they are PR nightmare, and not worth the investment. Are they really that good at fighting? Like one Azov member is worth 10 russian soldiers?
>Western media is ignoring neo nazi paramilitaries and here's why it's a good thing!
Their not talking about it because it doesn't fit the narrative. US media doesn't even talk about how only the nazis are fighting.
yes, they're literal nazis in the best possible way.
How do the lefties in Reddit who are going to fight rationalize the fact that they will go and fight on the side of literal Neo Nazis despite screaming about killing Nazis since trump was elected ? I never go to Reddit bit I'm fascinated if they even actually acknowledge it.
Almost all Ukrainian nationalists are nazis. It's a long history.
They don't rationalize they are sheep. The media could tell them to kill blacks and they would have a hard time not doing it.
Only thing funnier than that is Any Forums of all places (you know, where they unironically like to wave green themed nazi flag) is now so much against nazis lmao
Kek imagine if Ukraine wins the war then Azov turns around and takes over the country in a coup, imagine the egg on redditard’s faces
>Why isn't western media talking about this?
we are, constantly. the shills will be all over this thread. let me tell you what they will say
>WE NEED TO KILL THOSE EVIL WHI- I MEAN, JEWISH FUNED UKRAINIAN NAZIS !!!1 PUTIN IS GOING TO SAVE THE WHITE RACE GUYZ FOR REAL TRUST ME !!!1
Nazism is evil. I hope they repent.
The US state department as been protecting and funding Ukrainian nazis since 1945. You are a fucking shill.
they actually identify as nazies
>The Azov Battalion has been described as a far-right militia,[38] with connections to neo-Nazism and members wearing neo-Nazi and SS symbols and regalia, and expressing neo-Nazi views.
and act like one too:
>Reports published by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) have connected the Azov Battalion to war crimes such as mass looting, unlawful detention, and torture.
Shilling against Azov always boils down to three points. Your memepic is mostly point 2:
>1. They are funded by jewish oligarch Kolomojskij
>2. They have weapons from Israel
>3. They serve the jews
1. Is false, because there is simply no proof of that beyond one citation from an Israeli newspapers (Ma’ariv), which in turn admit it is a "rumor". And, this claim would be debatable at best even if we would agree that he did funded the battalion, since Kolomojskij simply did not take his money and put it to Azov hands, he blanket-funded dozens of volunteer battalions very early during the first clashes of the civil war. In comparison, he funded his own battalions as well.
2. Only claim for this again comes from Israel. Specifically a group of Israeli NGOs, who claimed Azov has been using Tavor rifles. But these were not Tavor rifles, but Ukrainian-made Fort rifles on IWI license acquired by previous government in 2008.
3. This is more of a fallacy than anything factual. Zelensky, a jew, is president of Ukraine. But the Battalion have been loud critics of the government for years. When invasion happened, they went to defend their country. As nationalist do, fighting for their people, not for the government.
Tavor/Fort explained: the video from which often reposted screenshot comes from says so itself. Here is the video youtube.com
Now what does the dude says?
>"sturmovy karabion Fort"
>= assault rifle Fort
So not a Tavor. So what is actually a Fort?
>">Fort (Ukrainian: КП HBO "Фopт" MBC Укpaїни (full name), HBO "Фopт" (short name)) is a Ukrainian weapons manufacturer from Vinnytsia, Ukraine
>In October 2008, RPC Fort and Israel Weapon Industries reached an agreement to allow Fort to license-manufacture in Ukraine firearms such as the Tavor rifle system"
tl;dr source posted here as a "proof" these are jew guns is actually saying the opposite.
the media will create a new, imaginary azov without nazis and gaslight the old one out of existence.
They are quite literally fighting and dying for the right of their jewish president to join globohomo NATO.
Ironic what Hulkko, you should stick off the fucking media to understand that portraying badly your enemy is the best way to convince sheeple that "we r good they r bad", have you ever fucking studied history at school ?
Ooops you're a retarded cunt and cannot read between the lines.
My bad, inbreeding is kinda rough up there
Why are there neo-nazies in Ukraine anyway? I thought nazies considered Slavs an inferior race?
It is 100% true they are funded by kolomoisky and the Ukrainian government. They are also funded by the US state department. Ukrainian nazis have protected and funded by the US state department since 1945. These groups took part in every colour revolution in Ukraine and the wars in the donbass. Keep on jerking off to symbols and slogans retard.
surrender man
dont worry russians will treat zelensky better than how nato treated gheddafi
why should i care if some fighters are nazis? why being nazi is such a major issue?
I am not sure. I know Stepan Bandera created a nazi movement in Ukraine and worked with the nazis as the nazis occupied the area. The Ukrainian nazis were psychopaths who killed tens of thousands of Poles. The Nazis through Stepan Bandera in jail. After the war USA protected him.
>If I will repeat my bullshit, maybe someone will fall for it
Say US gets invaded tomorrow by Chinese. You would obviously, as I hope, go and defend your people and your nation from the foreign invasion. I would then call you a Biden supporter here, because he is currently the president. Doesn't seem fair or really makes any sense, does it.
>It is 100% true they are funded by kolomois
You can post proof for that any time, user.
>They are also funded by the US state department.
Not anymore. And they were never really "funded" by US, whole Ukrainian military was.
>"This year, though, the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill signed into law last week stipulates that “none of the funds made available by this act may be used to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.”"
thehill.com
Fake. See:
You should care, but Americans should.
>being a Nazi at home makes you a domestic terrorist and robs you of a fair trial
>but you’re still expected to find Nazis in Ukraine because the Jews said so
it’s not really nationalism when it’s everyone besides me.
bullshit. Azov battalion isn't even that old. They are mayor part of maidan and a mayor part of the wars in donbass. They are 100% funded by the state department dickhead.
Didn't USA do something like that during the civil war? They gave the opposition weapons, then the opposition split up between the moderate and ISIS, so ISIS were literally fighting with the weapons USA gave them. Can't something happen here?
>everybody gives weapon to ukraine
>part of them goes to the hardened Azov battalation
>Azov battalion uses those weapons to seize the control of the country after the war
> Say US gets invaded tomorrow by Chinese.
already your analogy is shit since the US doesn’t rely on anyone for our own defense, unlike Ukraine.
You’re still ignoring the fact that being nationalist in America is tantamount to being a terrorist. Why should I support my government supporting you when they kill arrest me for the same thing?
Go fuck yourself and fight your own fucking war.
The weapons we ship over there we know it will end up in Azov's hands. Don't you know about Iran Contra?
>bullshit
It is literally a citation from your own law, user.
>mayor part of maiden
Azov did not existed back then. Only fairly lately were integrated into Ukrainian NG, hence probably getting some US money - as the whole Ukrainian military did. Then it was cut out once your lawmakers get screeched on by your yidish speaking diaspora.
>US doesn’t rely on anyone for our own defense
Can't see any other standing army defending Ukraine.
>You’re still ignoring the fact that being nationalist in America is tantamount to being a terrorist
I didn't even remotely said anything about the US beyond the analogy YOU started with. This is simple line of thought - just as you would go out to shoot the foreign invader, WHILE you hate your government (rightfuly so), same does Azov.
Besides, you are American, why the fuck would you even care about war in Eastern Europe.
sneed
user, your response makes no sense so I’ll explain it like to a child:
My government doesn’t support American nationalism.
My government does support Ukrainian nationalism.
Therefore, I do not support Ukrainian nationalism. It is clearly not even close to my interest if my government supports it.
>muh strawman argument
Nice one
>My government doesn’t support American nationalism.
Yes.
>My government does support Ukrainian nationalism.
No. They support Ukrainian government. They literally made an exception in law to NOT support Ukrainian nationalism (Azov).
The problem with groups created for war is that they have links to bigger movements in the country. For example right sector. The beggining of Azov is even more sketchy than I thought. As for American law that shit doesn't mean a damn thing.
No, they support Ukrainian nationalist since they are arming them and completely ignoring the fact that they are nationalist not even a year after my government labeled nationalism as terrorism.
My government supports Azov, therefore I don’t.
adl.org
Anti-Defamation League says they're good nazis because they discriminate against Russians instead of Jews.
>russian bot farms are presenting the Azov battalion as breaking news
You can't make this shit up. You've been screaming about this for 16 days now.
Some 500 gay LARPers in the army don't justify shelling babies. It didn't back in 2014, it still doesn't. If it did, Russia should be shelling every PD in the U.S. right now.
>My government supports Azov
>No, they support Ukrainian nationalist since they are arming them
They arm ukrainian military, with literal exception to Azov.
See:
>"This year, though, the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill signed into law last week stipulates that “none of the funds made available by this act may be used to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.”"
thehill.com
They support Azov battalion you dumbass. They know about the ends and outs of Ukraine. They know where the money goes. Stop pretending like Azov battalion is this independent group they are not.