If anyone knows anything about weapons here, can you explain why Ukraine is so effective against Russians tanks with "NLAW FGM-148 Javelin" and "Bayraktar TB2 drone" systems, but completely fails against aviation with "FIM-92 Stinger". Apparently both are latest generation weapons and are were provided in large numbers to Ukraine. But Ukraine keeps whining about "no fly zone" and gets absolutely demolished by Russian aviation. At the same time they're providing a real fight against ground troops, especially tanks and APCs.
Ukraine has impressive anti-tank defence, but sucks at anti-air
Luis Nguyen
Other urls found in this thread:
mirror.co.uk
twitter.com
Jason Myers
What a noob lol
Lmao
Robert Lee
flat terrain makes airborne reconnaissance easy
Parker White
you can literally down helicopters just fine with a javelin btw, you just dont use top attack mode since the rotor blade confuses the missile
Evan Foster
>NATO will come to help any day now
>They promised during Budapest Memorandum
lol, trusting nato
Kayden Ortiz
Well helicopters are only used for airborne drops. I think it's those pesky planes that are giving them the most troubles.
Bentley Turner
Well sure, some lessons learned there. But we have literally NATO bases on our land, I think (hope, pray) they won't dare...
Eli Stewart
They have S300 systems. It's primarily those systems why the Russians still don't have air superiority in a large part of Ukraine
Aaron Long
NATO didn't help the Crimeans... Russia fighting Nato = WW3. Therefore, NATO will never do anything...
William Butler
Do you expect the hohols and nato admit that they conducted illegal biological weapons industries in Ukraine? Do you expect Ukraine and nato countries to make compromises.
You will be regionalized.