You cant refute this

>it looks like we are about to get exterminated worldwide
>just has planned all along, we're winning!
Lmao the absolute cope. We'll see who's around in 20 years. Spoilers alert, it's not the jews.

chariots at the bottom of the sea

because creation was made for the giveing of torah
he was a goat and your a faggot spiritualy on the same level as a nigger
poland is a meme country

Evidence???

>poland is a meme country
israel is not even a country. at least poles actually live in poland instead of amerikike.

here you go
worldnewsdailyreport.com/red-sea-archaeologists-discover-remains-of-egyptian-army-from-the-biblical-exodus/
I no you are but what am I is your only response because you no Im right poland is fake and gay make it prussia again

Attached: Coat_of_arms_of_Prussia.svg.png (1896x2048, 822.49K)

Then let the world die already. I'm that sick of kikes.

Oh so you did kill all the Egyptian children then? Fucking kikes.

aye tony go choke on some ravioli
you will plow, you will so, and we will reap
not personaly but it was done on our behalf

Attached: aboslolutestateofitaly.png (993x670, 1.18M)

Lol.
>Chariot falls off boat
>See goys!!! Our pedophilia how to manual is real!!!
Is this the new like cope bros?

>bros?
you not feeling to good now and need re affirmation from your fellow sub humans, respite will not find you

First of all, the ancient soldiers seem to have died on dry ground, since no traces of boats or ships have been found in the area.

The positions of the bodies and the fact that they were stuck in a vast quantity of clay and rock imply that they could have died in a mudslide or a tidal wave.
The sheer number of bodies suggests that a large ancient army perished on the site, and the dramatic way by which they were killed, seem to corroborate the biblical version of the Red Sea Crossing when the army of the Egyptian Pharaoh was destroyed by the returning waters that Moses had parted.

Attached: 1645932922740.png (1600x1600, 188.95K)

The same site (pic).
It's a satirical news site like onion that makes fun of the fact that there is no evidence. Now my turn
>The actual evidence concerning the Exodus resembles the evidence for the unicorn. -Baruch Halpern, Pennsylvania State University
>Rabbi David Wolpe sensibly admits that the story of the exodus is a myth. Before 2000 worshippers at the Los Angeles Sinai Temple, he said that “the way the Bible describes the exodus is not the way it happened, if it happened at all,” and the speech was reported on the front page of the Los Angeles Times. Jews hearing the sermon do not seem to have been outraged by it in the least but those reading about it in the LA Times exploded with apoplexy. Rabbi Ken Spiro was one of them, and fired off a refutation for his employers at aish.com, but it is as honest as all apologetic writings—it is not.
>Spiro begins in a typical fashion by debasing the science of archaeology. Excavation is merely a mechanical skill, and interpretation of the finds is subjective. Spiro tells us that any “two world-class archaeologists will often come to different conclusions” over any artefact—particularly when religious beliefs are involved. What this overlooks is that, while there is certainly subjectivity involved in some assessments of archaeological finds, archaeologists will more often agree rather than disagree, and, as Spiro rightly says disagreements are often rooted in religion.
>What he does not say is that some people like to call themselves scholars even though they have no interest in any scholarship that might challenge their religious beliefs.

Attached: Screenshot_20220311-202256_Chrome.jpg (720x1298, 328.82K)

Lmfao. We got a live one! It writes a novel of seethe with shaking hands and quivering lips to make itself feel human. The absolute state of Yids in 22'.

Attached: piZap_1644187500288(1).jpg (1080x480, 275.08K)

Hahahahahaha kikes on suicide watch.

>Lichtman says that minimalists are dismissive about the Merneptah Stele, an Egyptian inscribed stone dated about 1210 BC which mentions an Israel in the land of Canaan as a “people that had to be reckoned with.” In fact the stele says: Israel is laid waste, his seed is no more.
Concerning the Merneptah Stele, Dever says the revisionists: …denigrate it as our only known reference. But one unimpeachable witness in the court of history is sufficient. There does exist in Canaan a people calling themselves Israel, who are thus called Israel by the Egyptians—who after all are hardly biblically biased, and who cannot have invented such a specific and unique people for their own propaganda purposes
>The alert reader might have had a thought at this point. If Merneptah, the Egyptian Pharaoh and a son of Rameses invaded what was described as the land of a people called Israel, then how can Bryant G Woods be certain that the destruction he claims to find at contemporary Jericho is not the destruction of Merneptah. Woods says he has found fire and seed, so perhaps Merneptah actually set out to destroy seedcorn. Admittedly the better sense is that the race has been wiped out, but some biblicists feel they have to explain that it was not, and so say the seed meant seedcorn. Anyway, the point is that biblicists take all their cues from the bible even though there are better ones in the sense that they are vouched for in real history. If we accept the truth of the Merneptah Stele, we ought to accept that any destruction of cities areound this time must have been Merneptah’s and not legendary Israelites.

>satirical news site l
hish up will yeah im trying to dab on the gentiels and your fucking things up for me
>debasing the science of archaeology.
these same people are the ones who tell us race is a social construct and that we all came from africa they deserve to be debased and every thing they say should be taken with a boulder of salt, facts remains their is plenty of evidence for semites some of whom were slaves in eygypt, outher wer eall the way up the social stratosphere in the company of pharo, there is also antrhopolical evidence to suggest that the anceint isralites were never typical semites to begin with
anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/aa.1902.4.4.02a00030
>This anomalous condition can be explained by the assumption
that the Jews may have been round-headed originally. This is
at present difficult to prove, because we have almost no skulls of
the primitive Hebrew to verify this assertion. Lombroso brings
the measurements of five Hebrew skulls obtained from the catacomb of Saint Calixtus in Rome, dating back to 150 A.D., and he
aptly remarks that these skulls are of great importance because,
at the period from which they are derived, there could not yet
have been any considerable racial intermixture of the Jews with
others, hence the cranial type which they represent should be
considered pure. The crania( indices of these skulls are 80, 76.1,
78, 83.4, and 75.1, which means an average cephalic index of the
living of 80.5, differing by far from the cephalic index of the nonJewish Semites.

source?

>The dating of the Merneptah Stele is also bound up in doubts that some scholars have about Egyptian dating being based essentially on Manetho who was simply inexact. The various Dark Ages in ancient history might be explained by false dating which would lead to about 300 years dropping out of Egyptian history around this time. Merneptah’s Stele would then be dated close to the time of the biblical Omri and Assyrian Khumri, apparently the historic founder of the Israelite state. Even so, Minimalism does not require it and Merneptah’s Stele, if correctly dated simply is the first reference to a people known as Israel. Since Israel seems to be a word cognate with the word Syria, it might have meant no more than that. Otherwise, it was just the Sons (or seed!) of El—the people whose god was El—but these people had no land of their own. The same stele says they lived in the land of the Hurrians.
>Lichtman continues with the tricks he has, knowing them to be tricks, we must assume since he is a rabbi. The bible reports the Philistines as expert metal workers, and to have come from Crete. These facts were true but Lichtman seems amazed that the bible should have known it. He lies outrageously, however, to strengthen his point spuriously by claiming the Philistines “were off the political map by the 9th century BC,” hoping to suggest that a later writer could have known nothing about them. They were on the political map until the time of Nebuchadrezzer at least, and probably were only absorbed fully in Persian times. They were certainly on the political map long enough to give their name to the country they lived in—Palestine!

> the final redemption of the jew
Nope.

Attached: nigger-brain.gif (317x193, 19.77K)

>Lichtman again tells us facts that simply cannot be accepted without the original sources because of his biblicist false assumptions. He says that the “pim” of 1 Samuel 13:19-21 when the Israelites go to the metal smiths of the Philistines to have their tools sharpened was an ancient coin weight used “exclusively” during the “Israelite settlement period.” Since there was no conquest and therefore no Israelite settlement period Lichtman is again talking bible and not scholarship. Nevertheless Dever asks whether a writer in the 2nd century BC could have known of the existence of these pim weights which would have disappeared for 5 centuries before his time, and answers, “No.”

Here are a whole load of confusions. Five centuries before the second century is the seventh century not the twelfth century, which is supposedly the settlement period. So were these pims in use for five centuries then went out of use in the seventh century? If they were in use for so long how do they know they went out of use in the seventh century? Could they have lasted until the fifth century before they went out of use. If so then they could easily have been remembered in the second century when these books were re-written by the Maccabees because they were re-written and the pim was in the original version written in the fifth century when Deuteronomy was presented to the Israelites.

no one is more gay on Any Forums than you twink

every single western country sucks off israel like no tomorrow
endless persecution complex
no one is banding against you

>Lichtman says that Dever maintains with relative certainty that early Israelites settled the land because approximately 300 small agricultural villages have been found, built between the 13-11th centuries BC, the time period of the “Israelite conquest of the land.” Lichtman insists on reminding his readers of this conquest although Dever himself speaks of a “settlement”—not necessarily the same thing. Dever considers this to have been a large increase in population at the time, and from a non-native people. Their houses matched descriptions in Judges and Samuel, it seems. The settlements lacked any pig remnants amongst animal bones left in the area. Lichtman says only Jews had a pigless diet. This might be when the tradition of not eating pig arose in Israel, but it is not any confirmation that the people there were Jews, but merely that the Jews continued a local tradition. Futhermore, the absence of pig bones means nothing unless it is related to previous middens and others in the region.

our success is proof of g-d the sceintest even tell us we were only a few hundred recently and now number in the million this is not normal, neither is return from exile after 2000 years scattered

Attached: jewacrheology.png (1832x1752, 3.23M)

The best thing to do in this scenario. Is absolutely nothing. Exercise soft and hard power and leverage equity and nationalism to deescalate their level of control over the west. Leave them to their own machinations at the mercy of their neighbors.

Not our problem

And leave the crypto-jews, diaspora, half-jews, ... alone, right?

> faggot spiritually on a mental level
I really comprehended that. Many such cases.

Let's start with the monarchy then.
>The bible relates how king Solomon renovated three cities—Hazor, Megiddo and Gezer—to serve as garrisons for his cavalry. Archaeologists have discovered gates that match this description to these cities that “date to the time of Solomon.” Lichtman is using his perpetual trick. There is no time of Solomon until the existence of Solomon is proven. >Lichtman cites Amihai Mazar as saying that these gates were “attributable to Solomon on archaeological grounds as well as on the basis of the biblical reference.” Quite what he means is a puzzle because there is nothing in the archaeology that identifies the gates with Solomon at all. The identification is purely biblical, and the bible could refer to them if the gates were known in more recent times. The only thing he could mean is that the gates were substantial befitting a grand king, but nothing else suggested a wealthy kingdom at all.
>Prof Israel Finkelstein proposed a dating system that places the construction of the gates 100 years after the “time of Solomon.” William Dever strongly opposes this, saying it “is not supported in print by a single other ranking archaeologist.” Needless to say, the statement is extreme as Dever’s often are, and the reason is the biblicist desire to hang on to what little they have.

There is no ethnic group in northeast Africa or the Middle East that wasn’t enslaved on Egypt at some point.

why do we find the grain reserves at jericho not depleted if you sacked a city wouldt you loot their food supplies, and if it endured a long seige as it was desighned to then wouldt the grain reserves be expended?

>you cant refute this
Jews are not the Isrealites of the Bible
They are Edomites mixed for 1000s of year with whatever

No, make some level of farm work mandatory for everyone. They get to use 1 collective kvetch to avoid working on Saturdays and Sundays.

i'm still going to call them jews

>Lichtman cites the discovery by Avraham Biran of a victory inscription dated to the 9th century BC at the site in Tel Dan. Lichtman, guided by God rather than good sense as ever pronounces that the phrases, “king of Israel” and “Beit David” (House of David) appear. Not only is there doubt about the interpretation, there is even doubt about the stele itself. Lichtman cites Anson Rainey who like all biblicists resorts to calling the critics names: As someone who studies ancient inscriptions in the original, I have a responsibility to warn the lay audience that the new fad represented by Philip Davies and his ilk is merely a circle of dilettantes. Their view that nothing in the biblical tradition is earlier than the Persian period, especially their denial of the existence of the united monarchy, is a figment of their vain imagination. The name “House of David” in the Tel Dan and Mesha inscriptions sounds the death knell to their specious conceit. Biblical scholarship and instruction should completely ignore the school. They have nothing to teach us.

Total coincidence that Scythians, who are partial ancestors to half of europe, were skilled chariot and horse warriors.