Attached: Adolf_Hitler_-_Wien_Oper.jpg (898x653, 94.27K)
Why was Hitler's art rejected?
Carson Lee
Oliver Jones
because the jews needed hitler to fail and become despondent so he could be filled with righteous rage so he could appeal to the disenfranchized volk so he could become chancellor so he could orchestrate the holocaust so the elite jews could cull their own masses so they could wield the event as a cudgle for the next century so they could demonize any form of nationalism so they could weaken the white man, the eteral threat of the jews
Dylan Williams
I find it high quality, but uninteresting. Sure he gets an accurate depiction of buildings and landscapes, but...
For me, anyway, art should convey some emotion. Do something interesting or transformative with the subject. His stuff reminds me of architectural renderings and stock photos.
Sorry, Hitler. You were better served in government than art school.
Blake Robinson
It wasn't degenerate enough
Jaxson Morris
Where can I buy his paintings? Imagine the value in 50 years when everyone realises that he was right and ahead of his time.
Michael Lewis
I would certainly buy his art when he was just a young chap. It looks beautiful as fuck but the reason he was rejected is because his art was more akin to an architectural one not a more human and naturalist one like the university wanted. Also Hitler sucks at drawing humans so there's that.
Connor Perry
I don't reject his art, not at all.
>You are mistaken.
Fucking jews bought some of his paintings to burn them for demonstration.
>But you know what burns better then paintings?
>JEWS.
btw who wants the 40k paintings from / t / magnet link download?
Isaac Butler
He said in the comfy book that he was rejected because the guy deciding thought his skills of painting architecture would be better used in the architectural arts so he recommended he go into that path in university. He didn't want to though.
Carter Price
He had issues with perspective on all levels
Duce on other hand...
Asher Young
He would have done great
Noah Gutierrez
Thats not the kind of art Jews are looking for.
Jonathan Peterson
He was destined for more.
Nathaniel Myers
it was too experimental, he liked to purposely fuck with perception and shit
Camden Carter
Because his artwork was devoid of human emotion. He was an excellent Architectural painter and would have been well suited to Architecture, not Art.
William Young
This. I cant unsee the perspective issues when I see his paints still better than all the modern "artists" today tho.
Grayson Morris
/thread
Jack Evans
the nose knows
Hunter Scott
No where. Lol Unless you have millions.
Jace Fisher
Because it sucked?
In a world with cameras, realistic paintings are a boring waste of time. You were supposed to be doing Impressionist or something abstract even back then
Carter Foster
he wasn't jewish, which meant it was near impossible for him to make it in any creative field considering jews owned those fields
Ryan Adams
Not enough people with rearranged faces, shapes without form, haphazard splattering of colors, and other such dissonant and ugly jewish garbage. Art is the ultimate test, it is a way of depicting how one views and feels about the world. Hitler painted the beauty and reality of scenes around him. All of his paintings show his feeling of love for the order, the beauty of his surroundings. It is no surprise that jews paint what is in their minds as well. Overwhelming ugliness, uncomfortable warped perspectives and depressing themes. Jewish art reflects the Jewish soul and there is nothing there of value. The jews who spoke ill of his work did so because they despised the clear, orderly, positive views dwelling within Hitler.
>oy very Hitler just wasn't very good at art
What's good for the jew is bad for everyone but the jew.
Connor Roberts
It looked okay, but its not like art was rare in his time.
There were many people who did art just like nowadays, so an ''average'' painting wasn't really that interesting to people.
Christopher King
>A. Hittlery
Am I misreading this?
Luke Lewis
>realistic paintings are a boring waste of time
Kek you are retard, realism is the peak of art and abstract art the peak of mediocrity.
Nathaniel Baker
>Why was Hitler's art rejected?
Hitler was a nobody; a Bum. What would an art school gain by accepting a bum like Hitler?
The art school was probably full, they didn't want him. He could have applied to a less prestigious school.
Christian Reed
they're just average pictures of buildings, also his perspective was wonky
Xavier Howard
Because he was literally Hitler.
Owen Collins
They didn't know that at the time though
Brody Torres
Because he was shit at drawing people, nor did he wanted to. His perspective is also wanky as shit, but, to be fair, he never went to an art school.
Jason Robinson
perspective looks odd in this one, which i believe was the jews criticism also
on OP too, the top part of the building looks detached and behind the bottom, when it's meant to be one I think?
the right face of the lower section being so non-detailed also looks funny in contrast with the lamp post in front of it
sorry but this is amateur hobbyist at best, though with practice he could've gotten better
Ian Perry
That painting is not entirely realistic like the snoozefests that Hitler drew
Technique is not everything
Yeah this guy paints really well, but at the end of the day this is just wankery. He has more interesting, more abstract paintings
Anyway, too bad that he's a chud. You guys wrecked this good painter
Anyway. Hitler's kind of paintings were probably dime a dozen back then. Not surprising at all that there was room for someone that offered perspective flaws and nothing special
Ethan Foster
This is a great take on it, I agree 100%. Technically decent, but uninspired. That's not to say he couldn't have improved. The skills were there, I'd have invested in him.
Thomas Davis
>Why
Mason Ramirez
Even the stairs are fucked up
Jaxon Roberts
Jews