Who are they trying to reach with this propaganda?

I’m a white man and I just figure the media is lying to me and ignore it. Are they trying to reach women? What is the point of all these Russia hit pieces? Are the women going to go fight Russia?

Attached: 6DC40513-17D9-4405-9B4C-D0B6B956C042.jpg (1125x1787, 966.62K)

Why did the west let them do it, user?

Because no men of the west are willing to fight for this shit, lol

Why would we stop them?

How many Russians has their faggot hero zelensky killed so far? Still zero?

Boomers?

The same ones they're trying to reach with this propaganda

Attached: fjCeNpOl3gpo.jpg (828x885, 119.15K)

Is the point to sway public opinion towards an actual war? Make Russia look bad? It reminds me of what Pearl Harbor propaganda must have been like.

After all the fake stuff including the ghost of Kyiv snake Island the sunflower seed old lady the beauty queen with the airsoft rifle… I’m more inclined to believe what Russia is saying

Attached: C054CB5C-CC48-4514-89F5-D38D1ED17B32.jpg (750x1240, 219.07K)

I know i'm late but qrd on this chick? All i know is she's an insta thot and russians say she's acting for propaganda.

Attached: 1646849860-Tan2022-3-9_184327288_0-scaled.jpg (2560x1707, 563.34K)

everyone has already chosen a side, they pump out these stories to build morale on theirs. you can also tell the ukies are losing because their output is shifting from "lol stupid russians" to "look at how awful the russians are", but both are geared exclusively to western audiences since they play of the duality of idiot peasant/bond supervillain that makes up the russian stereotype here

a day or two ago zelensky claimed there were still children trapped in the rubble but there isn't a whisper about that today

Well it seems it would lower morale in the West but maybe not everyone thinks like I do. Why would it improve women’s morale though isn’t feminist’s biggest fear an army of men coming to force them back in the kitchen?

it fires up the pro-war types because it provides the moral justification for applauding the deaths of russians. this is an issue particularly for liberals who like to think that the preservation of life is their primary motivation. can't just go being happy that some teenager from novosibersk is going home to mamochka in a lunch box, but you can if he's an evil baby murder out to snuff out all that's good in this world

Why did the west let the Ukrainians do the Wolyn massacre?

>who
gullible dullards and those with virtue signaling guilty consciences

>Is the point to sway public opinion towards an actual war?
this

>Why did the west let them do it, user
Pregnant roastie e-thot BTFO, that’s why

Attached: 2A00A9B5-6227-4075-8618-CCB5412633CE.jpg (1500x1000, 253.42K)

Well it doesn’t seem to be working, I don’t feel like we are any closer to an actual shooting war with Russia.

>Are the women going to go fight Russia?
Yes, on the internet. Men have more important matters to attend to than to work as free shills 24/7.
Everyone in Ukraine is Russian, in denial or otherwise, so quite a lot.

> Yes, on the internet. Men have more important matters to attend to
Yes I don’t think it’s accomplishing anything except making the liberal women and homosexuals screech louder.

It is a headline in a publication owned by rich guy that would like to shame the west into war. That is the target audience.

Who is Russia?

It's babies in incubators all over again. (1991 Gulf War)

>voices
my fuckin sides are long gone