Feminism and eugenics

People don't like to hear that they need to get better to stay in the gene pool, because it is a subtle threat. But, if you tell them that all they have to do is avoid getting worse, then all of a sudden it becomes a perfectly reasonable idea to them. Therefore it stands to reason that peaceful, automatic eugenics is most likely to occur when women are selecting for tall+smart+strong men due to their fear of having a shorter, dumber, or weaker child.

Attached: atevon.jpg (500x425, 36.74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/FgCOBtEZ7QURn8nnL78sIw/
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/P3exUxHHtoXApViKz9AMSw/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This article is fake. Post a link or eat a dick.

>Tall, strong and smart men
Women do not select for smart men. IQ has been plummeting since the 1880s-1960s because womens partners have been getting dumber and dumber. They also select for psychopathy, which is completely malgenic.

>psychopathy
Well in a winner-take-all they are the winners who take all

They want to say feminine men but they can't, because they are feminists. Lol!

Feminism is socialism. All socialist excitedly want to genocide everyone they feel is inferior. The only difference in flavors of socialism is which group they want to kill off. The only debate to be had is how to kill all socialists and implement the kek socalist utopia.

Attached: 1238.jpg (474x335, 25.15K)

there is nothing wrong with demanding some base standard from people. something like
>in an alright shape
>not too autistic
>can provide
>knows how to fix things around the house
and so on are reasonable demands. everyone who is not either physically or mentally handicapped can fulfill those.
what is not reasonable is to demand that everyone should be the top 5%, because by definition that does not apply to 95% of the population and there is no way they could change it.

you have to set people reasonable goals they can actually achieve. if you ask me to move a 200lbs rocks, I will put some effort into it. if you ask me to move a 2000lbs rock I will tell you to fuck yourself and not even bother trying.

also it would help if the women who demand tall, strong, smart and successful men weren't all fat, stupid, boring and broke.

>also it would help if the women who demand tall, strong, smart and successful men weren't all fat, stupid, boring and broke.
That's the worst part about it. Women that are 4'9 demanding that potential suitors be over 6'0 is a joke. Then they blame men when they hit the wall.

No, they are the criminal scum who revert our societies to the stone age. Psychopaths were exterminated for 1000s of years by men improving our society and genepool. Women devolve mankind back to the primate mean

I'm 6'4" and it is really bizarre when these midgets approach me to be honest. They don't even reach up to my chest, just giving them a hug is already pretty awkward.
but it doesn't really matter to them because it's not about the question if you fit well together, for them it's just a question of if their partner is objectively superior in some regards to the partners of her female friends. they just look for an accessory to raise their own standing.

Hypergamy at it's finest.

Attached: fishmouthred.jpg (625x748, 68.23K)

Yeah short and disabled women have high standards for some reason. Most pretty women pre 24-25 undervalue themselves

INCELS RISE UP! THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH

Kek

>dumb
>weak

So they admit traditionally masculine men are intelligent and strong? But those are admirable qualities when you have a vagina.

> IQ has been plummeting since the 1880s-1960s
To be fair, the same is happening to testosterone levels. So I guess women don't want strong men either.

This
Post the article (archived) or fuck off

>High standards for some reason
It's fair simple. The less attractive a woman is the more attractive her partner has to be. A 4 needs a 9 so that it makes everyone think she is valuable as a partner. A 4 getting with a 4 is admitting that is the best she can do and is a 4.

Pretty girls just want the top because its the top. Ugly girls want the top because its the top and they NEED it to justify both to themselves and others that they are desirable and a desirable partner does that.

>Therefore it stands to reason that peaceful, automatic eugenics is most likely to occur when women are selecting for tall+smart+strong men due to their fear of having a shorter, dumber, or weaker child.
You're reasoning is weak and inaccurate, women can't go against their biology and they care even less about having weak dumb short children.
Your first point as nothing to do with the second

Attached: twitter woman dumb dating men who DGAF.jpg (800x473, 82.03K)

>women are selecting for tall+smart+strong men

and what if I put hormones and halides in the water supply?

your move.

>disabled women
Aren't being a woman already a disability ?

since the invention of the spear we have not let females be in charge of mate selection

societies that erred from this quickly failed, and were destroyed

None of that is true. This is a misinfo campaign.
Instead of posting a headline from a dumb roastie, you can actually google the birth-rate to IQ, or height, or anything, in modern feminist societies.

Spoiler: only the most retarded, short, vile people are breeding. Feminism and equalitarianism is literal turbo dysgenics, sterilizing the great to let the cesspool spread.

Women don't select men. Men select women. If approaching women as a man with testicles and testosterone is hard, imagine how a woman can pick a man, most of them just can't, they're at the mercy of the nearest vile baboon with the lowest IQ and highest impulsivity, specially if they're fat shut-ins; while the extroverted chase 6'4'' chads that make seven figure incomes and never actually have a child or even marry.

From the old empires that come even before Rome to the colonization era, Europeans had eugenics. Male selection and marriage before 18, coupled with other policies this meant the couples who were marginally better at organizing and making money had more children.

Feminism is dysgenics, women don't select for shit, and on top of that we destroyed all actually eugenic cultures and humanity is on a death spiral.

Attached: iq vs fertility.jpg (1000x573, 41.76K)

>Most pretty women pre 24-25 undervalue themselves
Because to them, everything they get feels natural because it's the only way they have ever known things to play out. They don't know that it's on a timer and that they should make the most out of it. Or, well, maybe that's already going too far into the other direction. I don't want them to be hyper-calculating either. But it would probably do them some good if they realized that things will not stay like that forever and their opportunities will not improve in the future.
Probably exactly why parents used to be heavily involved in it. They have a more objective view on it, no matter if their offspring is an attractive or unattractive match.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/FgCOBtEZ7QURn8nnL78sIw/
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/P3exUxHHtoXApViKz9AMSw/

Most women's problem is that they really only have one single interest, and that is social standing. Means they all compete on the exact same field and they have no way to cope. Some dude who is weak can tell himself he's at least smarter than the average and draw some confidence from that. Doesn't matter if a friend of mine can beat me in soccer easily when I have archery trophies and he doesn't even know how to string a bow. And so on and so forth.
But for those women, the only thing that matters is their standing in their social circle. If they simply do not make the cut, they have no way to cope and it makes them act in demented and self-destructive ways to try and compensate.

A jew wrote this article

Attached: 4E50F3D8-5D2D-402C-89C7-979E7629138A.jpg (1300x1238, 754.75K)

>which is completely malgenic.
Malgenic for a society, but we don't have that, we live in an economic zone, and its very eugenic for this environment.

For them its not a joke, the shorter they are the taller of a man they need for their sons not to be cursed as manlets.

>People don't like to hear that they need to get better to stay in the gene pool, because it is a subtle threat.
>Me with VA benefits and social security benefits

Quite the opposite to be fair, I am completely enjoying the shit out of life and have contributed literally nothing but a few years of hard work in the Navy.

Attached: 1643531603359.gif (360x290, 402.33K)