Any studies on why race-mixing is bad?

Attached: 1646247397245.webm (640x640, 872.33K)

Other urls found in this thread:

commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World-iq-map-lynn-2002.svg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

me

no, just plenty of observation

The mutation rate and distance preference parameters of nearest common ancestors are hyperparameters of the genetic algorithm. The ideal rates is best defined as: "just a pinch" or less than half of 1 percent for mutation rate and genetic distance of common ancestor not greater than 30 or 50 procreations away.

These women and men who are hybriding over a 100 to 300 million year gap are creating brand new things never before seen under God's yellow sun.

Attached: rejoin_hybrid_370m_generations.png (476x1000, 499.78K)

yes. you can look it up under the following:
OBJECTIVE REALITY
hth. thx 4 reading. have a blessed day

Cherrypicked shit like that spergy incel hapa who went on a killing spree. I don't know many hapas personally, but I'm pretty sure they aren't over represented in spree or serial killings. The vast majority of people outside of this virtual shithole don't give 2 shits how mixed a person is nowadays

nope, just a bunch of mean old ppl who are racist for no good reason. enjoy your wife's son, user.

>but I'm pretty sure they aren't over represented in spree or serial killings.
they are tho. lol delete your Any Forums platinum acct

This:
commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World-iq-map-lynn-2002.svg

The higher the IQ in a population the lower % of racemixing, I would say this
isn't inherit but a part of pure economics and stability.
High IQ people wanna excel in life and therefor chose partners
that are accommodating to that goal.

By mixing all races together you average out the genetic traits that lead to high IQ as a base.
This would happen naturally over, lets say 500 years through natural selection in a social darwinist society.
You cannot achieve this naturally in a economically competitive society and even less in a globally competitive environment.

Attached: World-iq-map-lynn-2002.svg.png (2560x1312, 536.58K)

you are a retarded nigger
no need for deboonking or studies to know its bad
you fucking cattle-brain

Race mixing is good if you want to keep all the species on a single branch rather than letting them diverge away from each other.

It's a choice, one with serious and noticeable consequences of genetic problems, but think of it like mixing up the pot. Genetic material from 300 million years ago in Africa is getting a fresh start to express itself in the biological and physical world and that exposure to light offers new surfaces for evolution by way of gradient ascent in natural selection to operate.

Most mutations are meant for the scrap heap, as the average of a dump drunk and toyota is probably not useful, however, the middle-average abomination will function like dropout, disabling things that are required, and lifting things to front that are not. Thus creating a completely different kind of person. Neither white European, nor a Congonese groundpounder.

They don't work because thinking is the white mans job. The old way was "Eat, Tear arms off enemy, Fuck, Breed, Supply food for a few years, then Repeat".

Humanity might do well to explore the old way. Working is for idiots.

Attached: what_race_mixing_looks_like.png (1705x860, 3.55M)

>*You cannot achieve this by force
Also if you wanna speed up racemixing you need to increase the opportunity of all especially among marginalized people.

bro just look at or talk to any hapa lmfaoo they are literally so fucking mentally ill

>Any studies on why race-mixing is bad?
>webm

>Any studies on why race-mixing is bad?
Dozens.
Where do you want me to start?
IQ or tissue-typing?

If you study it scientifically, and you come to a conclusion that the (((establishment))) doesn't like, your career will end very quickly.

Attached: nice pic.png (588x408, 405.34K)

Also this

True.
But that doesn't stop your findings being true.

tissue-typing. IQ is always a "socioeconomic" thing, and even when studies adjust for that, "A variety of different factors can also play a role.".

>IQ is always a "socioeconomic" thing
Who the fuck taught you that shit?
(t. neuroscience, neurochemistry, machine-learning)
I can tell nigger brain tissue under a microscope. You just count the average numbers of synapses per neuron.
IQ is NOT social, it is pure biology.

There's a reason nobody is trying to make an artificial female brain nor an artificial nigger intelligence in software/hardware.

Attached: Just Chillin n Peepin Outta Ma White Man's Technological Achievement, Bro.jpg (3424x2560, 1.08M)

I lost it at the "Circumcision device"

Attached: yfy.png (586x360, 347.62K)

But user... That's racist! Besides, even if studies DO prove that IQ is a good metric of intelligence, and that there is racial differences in that- Isn't biodiversity healthy? So many studies say that mixed race people have stronger immune systems and are more adaptable.

>I'm trying to find papers that can refute those retarded claims.

I AM A RACIST.
I AM A EUGENICIST.
Your point?
We should be culling people now, not helping starving failures pass on their tendency to fail.
Biodiversity is not as useful as survival traits.
Having three legs is cute but if it doesn't help you survive, its useless.
Having negros around may be cute, but they are NOT surviving the environment that predominates around our world now, namely industrial and post-industrial societies.
Those critters can't survive and need handouts.
We should be exterminating them. It's better in the long run for us both; we have money for a moonbase and they are no longer struggling and suffering the pain of knowing they're inferior to genuine humans.
Half-breeds have shitty immune systems. Did the recent covid and millions of halfcasts and brown dross stiffing it not teach you ANYTHING?

Attached: 1606849959378.jpg (736x722, 38.58K)