Seriously, guys, what is to be done about them?
Most women today lose their virginity as teenagers. This is a fact most of us are aware of. Most of us on Any Forums refuse to take a non-virgin bride. This is a problem because if none of us get married and have children then our morals will not be passed down. Perhaps the female race is salvageable in the next generation if they are raised to be more chaste and virtuous, but if religious people like us refuse to engage in today's horrific dating scene and never have kids, our morals will never be passed on. Should we settle for roasties and try to stop them from influencing our daughters? I don't have the solution but this is a real problem.
TLDR:
>modern women whores
>virtuous men don't want whores
>therefore, virtuous men don't have kids
>next generation isn't raised by virtuous people
>virtuous people cease to exist entirely
What do?
We need to talk about women
>women are trash subhuman
>I hate women
so you like men?
fag
That's not what I said at all. Fuck off, shill.
Sage is what we do you fucking muppet
it doesnt matter because most women have been sterilized by the vaxx anyways
we all know you sydney ching chongs love guys
fag
>racemixing
No.
It's going to wash itself out
Did you know there's almost 16 million single mothers in the u.s. alone?
What do you think is going to happen?
sos?
A woman isn't a whore just because she lost her virginity as a teenager. And just because a woman is a virgin it doesn't mean she's automatically a good person.
Easy.
This world is dead and will be replaced with the new one from my tree of life.
Only my spiritual family will exist that cannot fall, cannot get corrupted but always loves me, the most high, forever loyally and faithfully.
There will only be Atlantis with my 2000 white female sheeple, my female nazi soldiers and my valkyries who all love and fuck only me.
Only I fuck. Only I have sex.
I am God in the flesh.
My will be done.
Work on your personality and hook in a fat chick. Not everyone can be a chad. You can adapt.
we need to report all slide threads
it was over before it even began
1. Wrong. Losing one's virginity before marriage is a pretty good standard for defining a whore.
2. True. Virgin women can also be really fucking annoying.
What the fuck kind of response is this? I didn't say I can't get girls I said I don't want a girl who has slept around. Stop assuming anyone who cares about sexual morality is an incel.
Seriously, fuck off with your shitty everyday threads about women. Any incel who can't talk with a woman and nothing is going in his life decides to start a thread from his mom's basement to feel better about his pathetic life. Just kys and sage.
I just shacked up with a TERF femcel and convinced her to have 5 kids.
Pray for nuclear holocaust, it's the only way to purge the world and whoever is left will be too busy surviving.
So by that definition, are you a whore?
im a virtuous man and i dont care at all about whether my bitch is a whore or not. as long as she cant vote im happy
No, there are different standards for men and women. A man's bodycount doesn't matter because 1. women aren't as territorial as men 2. a man's premartial sex partner count doesn't increase marital instability and 3. men don't lose their pair bonding ability due to reduced oxytocin sensitivity when they have sex with many partners.
Sources to back up my claims because I know you will dispute them:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ifstudies.org
ifstudies.org
Don't concern yourself with the actions of others. Instead look only to control yourself and live in righteousness. If these words displease you then you are wicked and this thread needs to be saged.
The Amish will have to rebuild after the roastiepocalypse.
This is good advice. I think it's still worth thinking about the future of our people, though.
How do I join the Amish?
Women have always on average lost their virginity as teenagers they just got married first
not breeding is antinatalist cope. From an evolutionary pov the man who reproduces himself with even the lowest-tier woman defeats the man who surrenders by not reproducing.
user, a women who waits until her 30s to seek marriage and has a long, sexually active history on birth control pills and having abortions, she's not necessarily a "bad person" but is extremely undesirable as a wife compared to a woman in her late teens to very early 20s who is a virgin. If you're saying it's all the same, you're being disingenuous. This is also just the tip of the iceburg of why marriage for today's western man makes little to no sense. The rest of the argument lies in the practices and policies of family courts, and myriad of laws that benefit women at the expense of men such that any man would have to be an utter fool to get married, even if he married his highschool sweetheart he'd been with since kindergarten.
I see... So you think it is better to settle for an immoral woman for the sake of having children rather than maintain impossibly high standards given today's climate?
If you promote righteousness to your people and they reject it. They aren't your people.
>I didn't say I can't get girls I said I don't want a girl who has slept around.
if you mean you’ve slept around then you yourself don’t care about sexual morality. Fornication is self-harm and a spiritual deadening.
I didn't say I have slept around I said I didn't say I can't get girls.